Advertisement

Worth, Wonder and Worry in the Accelerated Academy

  • Rasmus Hoffmann Birk
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture book series (PASCC)

Abstract

This chapter gives no advice or guidance on how to be creative or innovative. Instead, it tells a story about the worries and anxieties one may encounter when conducting research. The chapter tells a story of encountering an absence of wonder and a presence of mundanity, and the worries this induced in its author, an early career researcher. But rather than succumb to individualized explanations, the chapter attempts to situate these feelings within the context of the contemporary accelerated academy. The chapter thus argues that the contemporary academy is structured by modes of worth that privilege demonstrable, economic value and productivity, actively inducing feelings of worry and anxiety.

Keywords

Accelerated academy Anthropology Everyday Worth 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Jess Perriam, Hanna Sjögren, Monica Greco, Ninna Meier, Elina Maslo and Ignacio Rivera Volosky for reading and commenting on this chapter.

References

  1. Back, L. (2015). Why everyday life matters: Class, community and making life livable. Sociology, 49(5), 820–836. doi: 10.1177/0038038515589292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burrows, R. (2012). Living with the h-index? Metric assemblages in the contemporary academy. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 355–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02077.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carrigan, M. (2015). Life in the accelerated academy: Anxiety thrives, demands intensify and metrics hold the tangled web together. Retrieved October 30, 2016, from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2015/04/07/life-in-the-accelerated-academy-carrigan/
  4. Collini, S. (2012). What are universities for? London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  5. Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing: And other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press DK.Google Scholar
  6. Ingold, T. (2014). That’s enough about ethnography! HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4(1), 383. doi: 10.14318/hau4.1.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Neyland, D., & Woolgar, S. (2002). Accountability in action? The case of a database purchasing decision. British Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 259–274. doi: 10.1080/00071310220133331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pink, S. (2012). Situating everyday life: Practices and places. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Strathern, M. (2000). Introduction: New accountabilities. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy (pp. 1–18). London/New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
  10. Strathern, M. (2002). Abstraction and decontextualisation: An anthropological comment. In S. Woolgar (Ed.), Virtual society? Technology, cyberbole, reality (pp. 302–313). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rasmus Hoffmann Birk
    • 1
  1. 1.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations