Abstract
This chapter aims to illustrate how different contexts can create opportunities for reflecting on essential questions and how these reflections call for other reflections, and the other reflections hopefully can result in some better understandings of things—how reflections are an important part of human learning. I do so by describing three spaces for reflection I have experienced recently: the conversation with two research participants in a study of learning at work, an important meeting at the conference in Singapore, and the situation at a writing retreat where I reflect on simple things. All three situations have this in common, that they provided a space for reflection—space for learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Becker, H. S. (1986, 2007). Writing for social scientists. How to start and finish your thesis, book, or article (2nd ed.). Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Boud, D. (1985, 1994). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Routledge Falmer.
Kolb, B. (2008). Involving, sharing, analysing – Potential of the participatory photo interview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(3), 1–25.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
Maslo, E. (2016). “I have learned – It is about something that happened in the past!” – Time, space and human interaction in different perceptions of learning at work. In A. Ostendorf & C. K. Permpoonwiwat (Eds.), Workplaces as learning spaces – Conceptual and empirical insights (pp. 105–123). Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press.
Revsbæk, L., & Tanggaard, L. (2015). Analyzing in the present. Qualitative Inquiry, 2(4), 376–387.
Singh, M., Rizvi, F., & Shrestha, M. (2007). Student mobility and the spatial production of cosmopolitan identities. In K. Gulson & C. Symes (Eds.), Spatial theories of education: Policy and geography matters (pp. 195–214). New York: Routledge.
Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum. Awareness, autonomy & authenticity. London: Longman.
Van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Socio-cultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–285). Oxford: University Press.
Van Lier, L. (2004). The semiotics and ecology of language learning. Perception, voice, identity and democracy. Utbildning & Demokrati, 13(3), 79–103.
Wegener, C. (2013). A situated approach to VET students’ reflection processes across boundaries. Journal of Education and Work, 27(4), 454–473.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maslo, E. (2018). “Give It a Name and It Will Be Yours”: How Opportunities to Reflect on Essential Questions Can Create Space for Learning. In: Wegener, C., Meier, N., Maslo, E. (eds) Cultivating Creativity in Methodology and Research. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60216-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60216-5_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60215-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60216-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)