Skip to main content

A Closer Look at the Relation Between Orness and Entropy of OWA Function

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Soft Computing Applications for Group Decision-making and Consensus Modeling

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 357))

Abstract

Ordered weighted averaging (OWA) functions have been extensively used to model problem of choice and consensus in the presence of multiple experts and decision makers. Since each OWA is associated to a weight vector many scholars have focused on the problem of the determination of this weight vector. In this study, we consider orness and entropy, two characterizing measures of priority vectors, and we study their interplay from a graphical point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amin GR, Emrouznejad A (2006) An extended minimax disparity to determine the OWA operator weights. Comput Ind Eng 50(3):312–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beliakov G, Pradera A, Calvo T (2007) Aggregation functions: a guide for practicioners. In: Studies in fuzziness and soft computing, vol 221. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G (1997) A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 27(1):126–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brunelli M, Fedrizzi M, Fedrizzi M (2014) Fuzzy \(m\)-ary adjacency relations in social network analysis: optimization and consensus evaluation. Inf Fusion 17:36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Emrouznejad A, Amin GR (2010) Improving minimax disparity model to determine the OWA operator weights. Inf Sci 180(8):1477–1485

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fedrizzi M, Kacprzyk J, Nurmi H (1993) Consensus degrees under fuzzy majorities and fuzzy preferences using OWA (ordered weighted average) operators. Control Cybern 22(4):71–80

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fullér R, Majlender P (2001) An analytic approach for obtaining maximal entropy OWA operator weights. Fuzzy Sets Syst 124(1):53–57

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fullér R, Majlender P (2003) On obtaining minimal variability OWA operator weights. Fuzzy Sets Syst 136(2):203–215

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Grabisch M, Marichal JL, Mesiar R, Pap E (2009) Aggregation functions. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kishor A, Singh AK, Pal NR (2014) Orness measure of OWA operators: a new approach. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):1039–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu X (2007) The solution equivalence of minimax disparity and minimum variance problems for OWA operators. Int J Approx Reason 45(1):68–81

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Majlender P (2005) OWA operators with maximal Rényi entropy. Fuzzy Sets Syst 155(3):340–360

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Hagan M (1988) Aggregating template or rule antecedents in real-time expert systems with fuzzy set logic. In: Twenty-second Asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang YM, Parkan C (2005) A minimax disparity approach for obtaining OWA operator weights. Inf Sci 175(1):20–29

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu Z (2005) An overview of methods for determining OWA weights. Int J Intell Syst 20(8):843–865

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Yager RR (1988) Ordered weighted averaging operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 18(1):183–190

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Yager RR (1993) Families of OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 59(2):125–148

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Yager RR (1996) Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. Int J Intell Syst 11(1):49–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research of Matteo Brunelli was funded by the Academy of Finland (decision no. 277135).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to József Mezei .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mezei, J., Brunelli, M. (2018). A Closer Look at the Relation Between Orness and Entropy of OWA Function. In: Collan, M., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Soft Computing Applications for Group Decision-making and Consensus Modeling. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 357. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60207-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60207-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60206-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60207-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics