The Circulation of Legal Phenomena: Past Lessons and Recent Issues

Chapter

Abstract

Specialists in comparative law are studying for a long time what is called ‘legal transplants’, what means the circulation of legal phenomena from one space to another. The debates remain open about the characters of these circulations, especially in a globalized world. This contribution proposes to distinguish the transfer of legal statements (1), the diffusion of legal ideas (2) and the worldwide acculturation of legal theories (3) in order to understand what are the features and the range of these circulations. It is the matter of recognizing the possibility of these circulations, their strong impacts during the nineteenth and the twentieth centuries, their transformations and their limits in the today world.

References

  1. Angenot M (2014) L’histoire des idées. Problématiques, objets, concepts, méthodes, enjeux, débats. Presses Universitaires de Liège, LiègeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cairns JW (2013) Watson, Walton and the history of legal transplants. Ga J Int’l Comp L 41:637–649Google Scholar
  3. Cuniberti G (2014) The merchant who would not be king. Unreasoned fears about private lawmaking. In: Muir-Watt H, Fernández Arroyo DP (eds) Private international law and global governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 141–155Google Scholar
  4. Ewald W (1995) Comparative jurisprudence. The logics of legal transplants. Am J Comp L 43:489–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fernández Arroyo DP (2014) Private adjudication without precedent? In: Muir-Watt H, Fernández Arroyo DP (eds) Private international law and global governance. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Frydman B (2014) A pragmatic approach to global law. In: Muir-Watt H, Fernández Arroyo DP (eds) Private international law and global governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 181–200Google Scholar
  7. Guastini R (2004) L’interpretazione dei documenti normative. Giuffrè, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  8. Kelsen H (1967) Pure theory of law. Translation by Knight M. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  9. Legrand P (1997) The impossibility of ‘legal transplants. Maast J Eur Comp L 4:111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lhuilier G (2016) Le droit transnational. Dalloz, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. Patterson EW (1919) The delivery of life-insurance policy. Harv Law Rev 33:198–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sacco R (1991) Legal formants: a dynamic approach of comparative law. Am J Comp Law 39:1–35. 344–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Teubner G (ed) (1997) Global law without a state. Dartmouth, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  14. Teubner G (1998) Legal irritants: good faith in British law or how unifying law ends up in new divergences. Mod L Rev 61(1):11–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Troper M (2001) Une théorie réaliste de l’interprétation. In: Jouanjan O (ed) Théories réalistes du droit. Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, pp 51–66Google Scholar
  16. Twining W (2004) Diffusion of law: a global perspective. J Legal Plur 36:1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Verhandlungen des ersten Deutschen Soziologentages vom 19.-22. Oktober 1910 in Frankfurt am Main (1911) Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  18. Watson A (1993) Legal transplants. An approach to comparative law. The University of Georgia Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
  19. Zimmermann R (1996) The law of obligations. Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Clarendon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zumbansen P (2012) Defining the space of transnational law: legal theory, global governance and legal pluralism. In: Handl G, Zekoll J, Zumbansen P (eds) Beyond territoriality. Transnational authority in the age of globalization. Martinus Nijhoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.École Normale Supérieure ParisInstitut Universitaire de FranceParisFrance

Personalised recommendations