Abstract
This chapter argues that the definition of law proposed from legal positivism influences interpretations of political action through its dismissal of legal claims that question state authority. It is argued that this leads toward methodological nationalism . Legal realism and legal pluralism are proposed as alternative approaches to develop a more nuanced, empirical, and critical understanding of the relationship between social and legal theories. A brief overview of legal realism brings to the fore its main features, and the work of Harold J. Berman illustrates how such a perspective can have an effect on concept of society. Legal pluralism is introduced as a different yet converging perspective. The focus is placed on authors such as Lauren Benton, whose work provides an alternative analytical context to study the meanings of legal disputes, and Paul Halliday, whose analysis illustrates the different kind of sociological analysis that the perspective can produce.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Acton, L. (1862). Nationality. The Home and Foreign Review, 1, 1–25.
Austin, J. (1875). Lectures on jurisprudence: The philosophy of positive law. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Benton, L. (2002). Law and colonial cultures: Legal regimes in world history, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benton, L., & Ross, R. J. (2013). Legal pluralism and empires, 1500–1850. London: New York University Press.
Berman, H. J. (1983). Law and revolution: The formation of the western legal tradition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bogdanor, V. (1988). Constitutions in democratic politics. Aldershot: Gower.
Brierly, J. L. (1955). The law of nations: An introduction to the international law of peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burgess, G. (2009). Filmer, S. R. (1588–1653). In Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/9424. Accessed 21 Sept 2014.
Fabry, M. (2010). Recognizing states: International society and the establishment of new states since 1776. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Filmer, R. (1949). Patriarcha. In P. Laslett (Ed.), Patriarcha and other political works (pp. 49–326). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Fisher, W., III, Horwitz, M. J., & Reed, T. A. (1993). Introduction. In W. Fisher III, M. J. Horwitz, & T. A. Reed (Eds.), American legal realism (pp. xi–xv). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grossi, P. (2010). A history of European law. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Halliday, P. D. (2013). Laws’ histories: Pluralisms, pluralities, diversity. In L. Benton & R. J. Ross (Eds.), Legal pluralism and empires, 1500–1850 (pp. 261–278). London: New York University Press.
Hearn, J. (2006). Rethinking nationalism: A critical introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hooker, M. B. (1975). Legal pluralism: An introduction to colonial and neo-colonial laws. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Leiter, B. (2007). Naturalizing jurisprudence: Essays on American legal realism and naturalism in legal philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lesaffer, R. (2004). Peace treaties from Lodi to Westphalia. In R. Lesaffer (Ed.), Peace treaties and international law in European history: From the late Middle Ages to World War One (pp. 9–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mangone, G. J. (1963). The elements of international law: A casebook. Homewood: Dorsey Press.
McIlwain, C. H. (1918). Introduction. In C. H. McIlwain (Ed.), The political works of James I, reprinted from the edition of 1616 (pp. xv–xxxiv). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1861). Considerations on representative government. London: Parker, Son, and Bourn, West Strand.
Montesquieu, C. S. (1989 [1748]). The spirit of laws. In A. M. Cohler, B. C. Miller, & H. M. Stone (Eds.), Montesquieu: The spirit of laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neff, S. C. (2006). A short history of international law. In M. D. Evans (Ed.), International law (pp. 29–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Olivecrona, K. (1971). Law as a fact. London: Stevens & Sons.
Rumble, W. E. (1968). American legal realism: Skepticism, reform, and the judicial process. New York: Cornell University Press.
Schauer, F. (2013). Legal realism untamed. Texas Law Review, 91(4), 749–780.
Thornhill, C. (2011). A sociology of constitutions: Constitutions and state legitimacy in historical-sociological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thornhill, C. (2013). Natural law, state formation and the foundations of social theory. Journal of Classical Sociology, 13(2), 197–221.
Wilks, M. (1963). The problem of sovereignty in the later Middle Ages: The papal monarchy with Augustinus triumphus and the publicists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Urrastabaso Ruiz, U. (2018). Legal Positivism, Legal Realism, and Legal Pluralism. In: Modern Societies and National Identities. Identities and Modernities in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60077-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60077-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60076-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60077-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)