Skip to main content

Complications Related to Catheter Migration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenging Cases and Complication Management in Pain Medicine

Abstract

Epidural block is a well-established method of providing both surgical anesthesia and analgesia. Epidural catheter migration is a recognized complication of this anesthetic modality. Once the catheter is inserted, it may still migrate despite efforts to secure it in place at the skin. Movement of the epidural catheter can induce many complications, the most serious resulting in unintentional intravascular or intrathecal injection of local anesthetic. Other issues can also arise, such as subdural migration, which can have dangerous effects, as well as migration out of the epidural space via an intervertebral foramen resulting in a unilateral or patchy block. The numerous safety concerns associated with catheter migrations have heralded the development of fixation devices. Because of the potentially devastating complications of catheter migration, it is very important of the anesthetist to recognize when a catheter is no longer in the epidural space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Weinberg GL. Current concepts in resuscitation of patients with local anesthetic cardiac toxicity. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002;27:568–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Feldman HS. Toxicity of local anesthetic agents. In: Rice SA, Fish KJ, editors. Anesthetic toxicity. New York: Raven Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boren E, Teuber S, Naguwa S, Gershwin M. A critical review of local anesthetic sensitivity. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2007;32(1):119–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rutten AJ, Nancarrow C, Mather LE, et al. Hemodynamic and central nervous system effects of intravenous bolus doses of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine in sheep. Anesth Analg. 1989;69:291–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tanaka M, Nishikawa T. A comparative study of hemodynamic and T-wave criteria for detecting intravascular injection of the test dose (epinephrine) in sevoflurane-anesthetized adult. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:32–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Picard J, Meek T. Lipid emulsion to treat overdose of local anesthetic: the gift of the glob. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:107–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Krismer AC, Hogan QH, Wenzel V, et al. The efficacy of epinephrine or vasopressin for resuscitation during epidural anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:734–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Soar J, Böttiger BW, Smith G. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2005;67(Suppl 1):S39–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mourisse J, Gielen MJM, Hasenbos MAWM, Haystraten FMJ. Migration of thoracic epidural catheters: three methods for evaluation of catheter position in thoracic epidural space. Anaesthesia. 1989;44:574–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Atlee JL. Total spinal anesthesia. In: Complications in anesthesia. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2007. p. 242–43. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Atlee JL. Inadvertent intrathecal catheter placement. In: Complications in anesthesia. Philadelphia: Elsevier/Saunders; 2007. p. 242–43. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Agarwal D, Mohta M, Tyagi A, Sethi AK. Subdural block and the anaesthetist. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010;38(1):20–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mehta M, Maher R. Injection into the extra-arachnoid subdural space. Experience in the treatment of intractable cervical pain and in the conduct of extradural (epidural) analgesia. Anaesthesia. 1977;32:760–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Romanes GJ. Cunningham’s manual of practical anatomy. 14th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986. p. 195–6.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pearson RMG. A rare complication of extradural analgesia. Anaesthesia. 1984;39:460–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jenkins JG. Some immediate serious complications of obstetric epidural analgesia and anaesthesia: a prospective study of 145,550 epidurals. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005;14:37–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reynolds F, Speedy HM. The subdural space: the third place to go astray. Anaesthesia. 1990;45:120–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Asato F, Nakatani K, Matayoshi Y, Katekawa Y, Chinen K. Development of subdural motor blockade. Anaesthesia. 1993;48:46–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lubenow T, Keh-Wong E, Kristof K, Ivankovich O, Ivankovich AD. Inadvertent subdural injection: a complication of an epidural block. Anesth Analg. 1988;67:175–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stevens RA, Stanton-Hicks MA. Subdural injection of local anesthetic: a complication of epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1985;63:323–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Collier C. Total spinal or massive subdural block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1982;10:92–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McMenemin IM, Sissons GR, Brownridge P. Accidental subdural catheterization: radiological evidence of a possible mechanism for spinal cord damage. Br J Anaesth. 1992;69:417–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ralph CJ, Williams MP. Subdural or epidural? Confirmation with magnetic resonance imaging. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:175–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsui BC, Gupta S, Emery D, Finucane B. Detection of subdural placement of epidural catheter using nerve stimulation. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47:471–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hood DD. Obstetric anesthesia: complication and problems. In: Kirby RR, Brown DL, editors. Problems in anesthesia. Obstetric anesthesia, Hood DD (Guest ED); 1989. Vol. 3. p. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Usubiaga JE, Dos Reis A, Usubiaga LE. Epidural misplacement of catheters and mechanisms of unilateral blockade. Anesthesiology. 1970;32:158–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanchez R, Acuna L, Rocha F. An analysis of the radiological visualization of the catheters placed in the epidural space. Br J Anaesth. 1967;39:485–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vadi MJ, Patel N, Stiegler MP. Local anesthetic systemic toxicity after combined psoas compartment–sciatic nerve block: analysis of decision factors and diagnostic delay. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(04):987–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magdalena Anitescu M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Qureshi, O.R., Anitescu, M. (2018). Complications Related to Catheter Migration. In: Anitescu, M., Benzon, H., Wallace, M. (eds) Challenging Cases and Complication Management in Pain Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60072-7_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60072-7_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60070-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60072-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics