Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conditional Contracts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Turkish Contract Law

  • 474 Accesses

Abstract

As a rule, most legal transactions, whether they are unilateral or bilateral, may be made conditional. Contracts in particular, whether obligatory or dispositive, may be made dependent on the occurrence or non-occurrence of a future uncertain event. There are two types of condition: suspensive (precedent) and resolutive (subsequent).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For further explanations see Pulaşlı (1989), Sirmen (1992).

  2. 2.

    Acte générateur d’obligation, Verpflichtungsgeschäft. See Chap. 7 fn. 5.

  3. 3.

    Acte de disposition, Verfügungsgeschäft. See Chap. 14 fn. 5–6.

  4. 4.

    Oser and Schönenberger (1929), Vorbemerkungen zum zweiten Abschnitt art. 151-157, N. 17; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 510.

  5. 5.

    For further explanations see Helvacı (2014), pp. 56–62.

  6. 6.

    Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 333; Feyzioğlu (1977), pp. 352–353; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 510.

  7. 7.

    Engel (1997), p. 846; Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 344; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 505; Tercier et al. (2016), p. 284.

  8. 8.

    Feyzioğlu (1977), pp. 348–349; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 333; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 516.

  9. 9.

    Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 333, 334; Eren (2015), p. 1173; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 517.

  10. 10.

    Anwartschaftsrecht.

  11. 11.

    Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 152, N. 9; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 517.

  12. 12.

    Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 152, N. 7; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 152, N. 20-25; Eren (2015), p. 1173; Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 333–334; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 518.

  13. 13.

    Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 151, N. 41, art. 164, N. 63; Engel (1997), p. 856; Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 357; Nomer (2015), p. 430.

  14. 14.

    Engel (1997), p. 856; Nomer (2015), p. 430; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 452.

  15. 15.

    von Tuhr and Peter (1979), § 52, IV, 2, p. 479 ff; Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 152, N. 31; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), pp. 354, 518; Öz (1990), p. 85 fn. 39, 97–98.

  16. 16.

    Condictio ob causam futuram or condictio causa data causa non secuta.

  17. 17.

    Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 152, N. 32; Engel (1997), p. 856; von Tuhr and Peter (1979), § 52, V, pp. 487–488; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), pp. 361 and 518–519; Öz (1990), p. 98.

  18. 18.

    Acte générateur d’obligation, Verpflichtungsgeschäft. See Chap. 7 fn. 5.

  19. 19.

    Acte de disposition, Verfügungsgeschäft. See Chap. 14 fn. 5–6.

  20. 20.

    Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 334; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 519.

  21. 21.

    Reserve de propriété, Eigentumsvorbehalt. Retention of ownership, reservation of title.

  22. 22.

    Oğuzman and Öz (2016), pp. 519–520.

  23. 23.

    Oser and Schönenberger (1929), art. 153, N. 3, see and compare to Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 510 fn. 348.

  24. 24.

    Engel (1997), p. 850; Feyzioğlu (1977), p. 369; Tekinay et al. (1993), p. 335; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 525.

  25. 25.

    Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 154, N. 14.

  26. 26.

    Thévenoz and Werro (2012), art. 154, N. 15; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 527; Eren (2015), p. 1178.

  27. 27.

    Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 527.

  28. 28.

    Oğuzman and Öz (2016), pp. 527–528; Eren (2015), p. 1178.

  29. 29.

    Acte de disposition, Verfügungsgeschäft. See Chap. 14 fn. 5–6.

  30. 30.

    Becker (1941), art. 154, N. 6; von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 86, IV, p. 276; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 528; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 455; Tercier et al. (2016), p. 287.

  31. 31.

    See Chap. 14 fn. 11.

  32. 32.

    Steinauer (2007), p. 273, fn. 6; Tandoğan (1990), pp. 372–373; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 529; Oğuzman et al. (2016), p. 214, fn. 666. See on the contrary, Eren (2015), pp. 1177–1178.

  33. 33.

    Tekinay et al. (1993), pp. 337–338; Feyzioğlu (1977), pp. 363–366, 368; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 523.

  34. 34.

    Eren (2015), p. 1168; Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 513; Reisoğlu (2014), p. 452.

  35. 35.

    Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 513.

  36. 36.

    von Tuhr and Escher (1974), § 84, IV, p. 259.

  37. 37.

    Oğuzman and Öz (2016), p. 514.

  38. 38.

    For further explanations see Sect. 5.3.2.

References

  • Aybay A (2011) Borçlar hukuku dersleri genel bölüm. Filiz, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker H (1941) Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch, Volume VI, Obligationenrecht, 1. Abteilung: Allgemeine Bestimmungen, Art. 1-183. Stämpfli, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger B (2012) Allgemeines Schuldrecht. Stämpfli, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel P (1997) Traité des obligations en droit Suisse. Stämpfli, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Eren F (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Yetkin, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyzioğlu FN (1977) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 2. Fakülteler, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch P, Schluep WR, Emmenegger S (2008) Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, vol 2. Schulthess, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Helvacı İ (2014) Eski medenî kanunumuzla karşılaştırmalı olarak Türk medenî kanunu’na göre mirasın reddi, (mk. m. 605 - mk. m. 618). Filiz, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Honsell H, Vogt NP, Wiegand W (eds) (2003) Basler Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Privatrecht, Obligationenrecht 1: Art. 1-529 OR. Helbing Lichtenhahn, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Kılıçoğlu AM (2013) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Turhan, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Nomer HN (2015) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Beta, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Oğuzman K, Öz T (2016) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler, vol 2. Vedat, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Oğuzman K, Seliçi Ö, Oktay-Özdemir S (2016) Eşya hukuku. Filiz, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Oser H, Schönenberger W (1929) Kommentar zum Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch, Volume V: Das Obligationenrecht, Erster Halbband: Art. 1-183. Schulthess, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Öz T (1990) Sebepsiz zenginleşme. Kazancı, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Özsunay E (1983) Borçlar hukuku I. Filiz, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulaşlı H (1989) Şarta bağlı işlemler ve hukuki sonuçları. Dayınlarlı, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisoğlu S (2014) Türk borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Beta, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwenzer I (2009) Schweizerisches Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil. Schulthess, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirmen AL (1992) Türk özel hukukunda şart. Banka ve ticaret hukuku araştırma enstitüsü, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinauer PH (2007) Les droits réels, vol 1. Stämpfli, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandoğan H (1990) Özel borç ilişkileri, vol I/1. Evrim, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekinay SS, Akman S, Burcuoğlu H, Altop A (1993) Tekinay borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. Filiz, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Tercier P (2004) Le droit des obligations. Schulthess, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Tercier P, Pichonnaz P, Develioğlu HM (2016) Borçlar hukuku genel hükümler. On iki levha, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévenoz L, Werro F (éd) (2012) Commentaire romand code des obligations 1: art. 1-529 CO. Helbing Lichtenhahn, Bâle

    Google Scholar 

  • von Tuhr A, Escher A (1974) Allgemeiner Teil des Schweizerischen Obligationenrecht, vol 2. Schulthess, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • von Tuhr A, Peter H (1979) Allgemeiner Teil des Schweizerischen Obligationenrecht, vol 1. Schulthess, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Law, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

    İlhan Helvacı

Authors
  1. İlhan Helvacı
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Helvacı, İ. (2017). Conditional Contracts. In: Turkish Contract Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60061-1_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60061-1_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60060-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60061-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation