Skip to main content

Between Caméra Stylo and the Making of Images: Hitchcock’s Cinematographers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reassessing the Hitchcock Touch
  • 399 Accesses

Abstract

On his 53 feature films, Alfred Hitchcock collaborated with 20 different cinematographers, a list indicative of his wish to provide continuity, yet also to experiment and involve different perspectives. Heinke shows how the hiring of a new cinematographer often marked a caesura and a period of artistic re-orientation for Hitchcock, particularly in the 1940s, when he sought to find a distinct style for himself in the American studio context. Heinke examines which influences individual cinematographers (including Bernard Knowles in Britain and Robert Burks in the USA) had on the visual texture of Hitchcock’s films, and he interrogates the complex question of an authorship of the cinematic découpage by asking whose hand really moves the caméra stylo (A. Astruc).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Works cited

  • Arnheim, Rudolf. Film as Art. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: U of California P, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astruc, Alexandre. “The Birth of a New Avant-Garde: La Caméra-Stylo.” [1948] The French New Wave. Eds. Peter Graham and Ginette Vincendeau. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, Ian. “Through the Lens.” 39 Steps to the Genius of Hitchcock. Ed. James Bell. London: BFI, 2012. 112–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Cinema Europe V: Opportunity Lost.” YouTube 8 June 2011, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Y2g1B1RVaU. Accessed 16 September 2016.

  • Curtis, Scott. “The Last Word: Images in Hitchcock’s Working Method.” Casting a Shadow: Creating the Alfred Hitchcock Film. Eds. Will Schmenner and Corinne Granof. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 2007. 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Film Society Programmes, 1925–1939. New York: Arno P, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, Sidney. “Hitchcock’s Silent Cinema.” Leitch/Poague 2014, 256–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, Charles. Hollywood Cameramen: Sources of Light. London: Thames and Hudson, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, Bill. Hitchcock at Work. London; New York: Phaidon P, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchenbuch, Thomas. “Filmanalyse aus produktionsästhetischer Sicht.” Filmanalyse interdisziplinär. Eds. Helmut Korte and Werner Faulstich. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1991. 90–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitch, Thomas, and Leland Poague, eds. A Companion to Alfred Hitchcock. Chichester; Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElhaney, Joseph. “Notorious, Bergman and the Close-up.” Hitchcock: Past and Future. Eds. Richard Allen and Sam Ishii-Gonzáles. London; New York: Routledge, 2004. 64–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGilligan, Patrick. Alfred Hitchcock: A Life in Darkness and Light. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osteen, Mark. “Introduction: Hitchcock and Adaptation.” Hitchcock and Adaptation: On the Page and Screen. Ed. Mark Osteen. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014. ix–xxxviii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peucker, Brigitte. “Aesthetic Space in Hitchcock.” Leitch/Poague 2014, 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prümm, Karl. “Von der Mise en scène zur Mise en images: Plädoyer für einen Perspektivenwechsel in der Filmtheorie und Filmanalyse.” Bildtheorie und Film. Eds. Thomas Koebner, Thomas Meder, and Fabienne Liptay. Munich: edition text + kritik, 2006. 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raubicheck, Walter, and Walter Srebnick. “Wrong Men on the Run: The 39 Steps as Hitchcock’s Espionage Paradigm.” Hitchcock and Adaptation: On the Page and Screen. Ed. Mark Osteen. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014. 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohmer, Éric, and Claude Chabrol. Hitchcock: The First Forty-Four Films. Trans. Stanley Hochman. New York: Ungar, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, William. The “I” of the Camera: Essays in Film Criticism, History, and Aesthetics. Cambridge: CUP, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, Thomas. The Genius of the System: Hollywood Filmmaking in the Studio Era. London: Faber and Faber, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarris, Andrew. “The Auteur Theory Revisited.” Film and Authorship. Ed. Virginia Wright Wexman. New Brunswick; London: Rutgers UP, 2003. 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, Janet. “Creating the Brand: The Hitchcock Touch.” The Cambridge Companion to Alfred Hitchcock. Ed. Jonathan Freedman. New York: CUP, 2015. 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vest, James M. “French Hitchcock, 1945–55.” Leitch/Poague 2014, 367–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj. “Foreword to the Second Edition.” Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Lacan (But Were Afraid to Ask Hitchcock). Ed. Slavoj Žižek. London; New York: Verso, 2010. vii–xviii.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heinke, R.H. (2017). Between Caméra Stylo and the Making of Images: Hitchcock’s Cinematographers. In: Schwanebeck, W. (eds) Reassessing the Hitchcock Touch. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60008-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics