Abstract
This chapter examines further the standards, domains, and principles in various mental health codes, as well as presenting meta-principles that apply to the revisions being proposed to the APA ethics code. The chapter first examines the standards in the CPA ethics code (Canadian Psychological Association, Canadian code of ethics for psychologists (3rd ed.). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Psychological Association, 2000; Ibid., The Canadian code of ethics for psychologists (4th ed.). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Psychological Association, 2017). The second topic of the present chapter examines, in particular, the relationship between the five proposed domains of standards and the five proposed core ethical principles for the APA ethics code. Third, the chapter describes the meta-principles that can help organize into a hierarchical structure the five core ethical principles and the five supplementary principles being proposed. Aside from the meta-principle that the core principles are related to the Neo-Maslovian model that Young (Unifying causality and psychology: Being, brain, and behavior. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2016) has developed, another major meta-principle relates to Responsibility. The chapter concludes by briefly comparing standards in the APA ethics code, the AMA ethics code (American Medical Association, Code of medical ethics. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 2017), and the ASPPB set of standards (Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards, ASPPB code of conduct, 2014).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Medical Association. (2017). Code of medical ethics. Chicago, IL: Author.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologists, 57, 1060–1073.
American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, Amended June 1, 2010). Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf
American Psychological Association. (2016). Revision of ethical standard 3.04 of the “ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct” (2002, as Amended 2010). American Psychologist, 71, 900.
Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2014). ASPPB code of conduct. Retrieved from http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.asppb.net/resource/resmgr/Guidelines/Code_of_Conduct_Updated_2013.pdf
Canadian Psychological Association. (2000). Canadian code of ethics for psychologists (3rd ed.). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
Canadian Psychological Association. (2017). Canadian code of ethics for psychologists (4th ed.). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
Fisher, C. B. (2017). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Goodman, D. M. (2012). The demanded self: Levinasian ethics and identity in psychology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 11–31). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon.
Lévinas, E. (1991). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (p. 33; A. Lingis, Trans.). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.
Overton, W. F. (2013). Relationism and relational developmental systems: A paradigm for developmental science in the post-cartesian era. In R. M. Lerner & J. B. Benson (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior. Embodiment and epigenesis: Theoretical and methodological issues in understanding the role of biology within the relational developmental system. Part A: Philosophical, theoretical, and biological dimensions (Vol. 44, pp. 21–64). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Schreiber, G., Avissar, S., Jotkowitz, A., & Halperin, D. (2016). The patient-psychiatrist relationship on the axis of the other and the same. Psychiatric Quarterly. doi:10.1007/s11126-016-9488-1.
Sinclair, C. (1993). Codes of ethics and standards of practice. In K. Dobson & D. Dobson (Eds.), Professional psychology in Canada (pp. 167–199). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Hogrefe and Huber.
Young, G. (2016b). Unifying causality and psychology: Being, brain, and behavior. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Young, G. (2017). Examining Standards, Domains, Principles, and Meta-principles. In: Revising the APA Ethics Code. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60002-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60002-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60001-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60002-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)