Skip to main content

Examining Standards, Domains, Principles, and Meta-principles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Revising the APA Ethics Code
  • 995 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines further the standards, domains, and principles in various mental health codes, as well as presenting meta-principles that apply to the revisions being proposed to the APA ethics code. The chapter first examines the standards in the CPA ethics code (Canadian Psychological Association, Canadian code of ethics for psychologists (3rd ed.). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Psychological Association, 2000; Ibid., The Canadian code of ethics for psychologists (4th ed.). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Psychological Association, 2017). The second topic of the present chapter examines, in particular, the relationship between the five proposed domains of standards and the five proposed core ethical principles for the APA ethics code. Third, the chapter describes the meta-principles that can help organize into a hierarchical structure the five core ethical principles and the five supplementary principles being proposed. Aside from the meta-principle that the core principles are related to the Neo-Maslovian model that Young (Unifying causality and psychology: Being, brain, and behavior. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2016) has developed, another major meta-principle relates to Responsibility. The chapter concludes by briefly comparing standards in the APA ethics code, the AMA ethics code (American Medical Association, Code of medical ethics. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association, 2017), and the ASPPB set of standards (Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards, ASPPB code of conduct, 2014).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Medical Association. (2017). Code of medical ethics. Chicago, IL: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologists, 57, 1060–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, Amended June 1, 2010). Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf

  • American Psychological Association. (2016). Revision of ethical standard 3.04 of the “ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct” (2002, as Amended 2010). American Psychologist, 71, 900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. (2014). ASPPB code of conduct. Retrieved from http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.asppb.net/resource/resmgr/Guidelines/Code_of_Conduct_Updated_2013.pdf

  • Canadian Psychological Association. (2000). Canadian code of ethics for psychologists (3rd ed.). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Psychological Association. (2017). Canadian code of ethics for psychologists (4th ed.). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. B. (2017). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D. M. (2012). The demanded self: Levinasian ethics and identity in psychology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 11–31). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévinas, E. (1991). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (p. 33; A. Lingis, Trans.). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overton, W. F. (2013). Relationism and relational developmental systems: A paradigm for developmental science in the post-cartesian era. In R. M. Lerner & J. B. Benson (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior. Embodiment and epigenesis: Theoretical and methodological issues in understanding the role of biology within the relational developmental system. Part A: Philosophical, theoretical, and biological dimensions (Vol. 44, pp. 21–64). Oxford, England: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, G., Avissar, S., Jotkowitz, A., & Halperin, D. (2016). The patient-psychiatrist relationship on the axis of the other and the same. Psychiatric Quarterly. doi:10.1007/s11126-016-9488-1.

  • Sinclair, C. (1993). Codes of ethics and standards of practice. In K. Dobson & D. Dobson (Eds.), Professional psychology in Canada (pp. 167–199). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Hogrefe and Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (2016b). Unifying causality and psychology: Being, brain, and behavior. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Young, G. (2017). Examining Standards, Domains, Principles, and Meta-principles. In: Revising the APA Ethics Code. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60002-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics