Abstract
A data management plan (DMP) describes how you will manage data during a research project and what you will do with the data after the project ends. Research sponsors may have very specific requirements for what should be included in a DMP. In lieu of or in addition to those requirements, good plans address 11 key issues: (1) research context (e.g., what questions or hypotheses will be examined); (2) how the data will be collected and acquired (e.g., human observation, in situ or remote sensing, surveys); (3) how the data will be organized (e.g., spreadsheets, databases); (4) quality assurance and quality control procedures; (5) how the data will be documented; (6) how the data will be stored, backed up and preserved for the long-term; (7) how the data will be integrated, analyzed, modeled and visualized; (8) policies that affect data use and redistribution; (9) how data will be communicated and disseminated; (10) roles and responsibilities of project personnel; and (11) adequacy of budget allocations to implement the DMP. Several tips are offered in preparing and using the DMP. In particular, researchers should start early in the project development process to create the DMP, seek input from others, engage all relevant project personnel, use common and widely available tools, and adopt community practices and standards. The best DMPs are those that are referred to frequently, reviewed and revised on a routine basis, and recycled for use in subsequent projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Andelman SJ, Bowles CM, Willig MR et al (2004) Understanding environmental complexity through a distributed knowledge network. BioSci 54:243–249. doi10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0240:UECTAD]2.0.CO;2
Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K et al (2013) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 41(Database issue):D36–D42. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1195
Consortium for Ocean Leadership (2010) Ocean observatories initiative: final network design. http://www.oceanobservatories.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/1101-00000_FND_OOI_ver_2-06_Pub.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2016
Cook RB, Wei Y, Hook LA et al (2017) Preserve: protecting data for long-term use, Chapter 6. In: Recknagel F, Michener W (eds) Ecological informatics. Data management and knowledge discovery. Springer, Heidelberg
Creative Commons Corporation (2016) Creative Commons. https://creativecommons.org. Accessed 14 Apr 2016
Digital Curation Center (2016) About DMPonline. https://dmponline.dcc.ac.uk/about_us. Accessed 14 Apr 2016
DMPTool (2016) Data management planning tool. https://dmptool.org. Accessed 14 Apr 2016
Dryad Digital Repository (2016) Dryad. http://datadryad.org. Accessed 14 Apr 2016
Dublin Core ® Metadata Initiative (2016) DCMI home: dublin core metadata initiative (DCMI). http://dublincore.org. Accessed 14 Apr 2016
Fegraus EH, Andelman S, Jones MB et al (2005) Maximizing the value of ecological data with structured metadata: an introduction to Ecological Metadata Language (EML) and principles for metadata creation. Bull Ecol Soc Am 86:158–168
Flemons P, Guralnick R, Krieger J et al (2007) A web-based GIS tool for exploring the world’s biodiversity: The Global Biodiversity Information Facility Mapping and Analysis Portal Application (GBIF-MAPA). Ecol Inf 2(1):49–60
Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (2016) Global Biodiversity Information Facility: free and open access to biodiversity data. http://www.gbif.org. Accessed 14 Apr 2016
Goble CA, Bhagat J, Aleksejevs S et al (2010) myExperiment: a repository and social network for the sharing of bioinformatics workflows. Nucleic Acids Res 38(suppl 2):W677–W682. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq429
Hampton SE, Anderson SS, Bagby SC et al (2015) The Tao of open science for ecology. Ecosphere 6:art120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00402.1
Higgins D, Berkley C, Jones M (2002) Managing heterogeneous ecological data using Morpho. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on scientific and statistical database management, pp 69–76
Michener WK (2017a) Quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC), Chapter 4. In: Recknagel F, Michener W (eds) Ecological informatics. Data management and knowledge discovery. Springer, Heidelberg
Michener WK (2017b) Creating and managing metadata, Chapter 5. In: Recknagel F, Michener W (eds) Ecological informatics. Data management and knowledge discovery. Springer, Heidelberg
Michener WK, Waide RB (2009) The evolution of collaboration in ecology: lessons from the United States Long Term Ecological Research Program. In: Olson GM, Zimmerman A, Bos N (eds) Scientific collaboration on the Internet. MIT Press, Boston, pp 297–310
Michener WK, Porter J, Servilla M et al (2011) Long term ecological research and information management. Ecol Inf 6:13–24
National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (2016) GenBank overview. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/. Accessed 14 Apr 2016
National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) (2016) NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. https://www.nodc.noaa.gov. Accessed 14 Apr 2016
Pampel H, Vierkant P, Scholze F et al (2013) Making research data repositories visible: the re3data.org registry. PLoS One 8:e78080. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078080
Peters DPC, Loescher HW, SanClements MD et al (2014) Taking the pulse of a continent: expanding site-based research infrastructure for regional- to continental-scale ecology. Ecosphere 5:29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00295.1
Porter JH (2017) Scientific databases for environmental research, Chapter 3. In: Recknagel F, Michener W (eds) Ecological informatics. Data management and knowledge discovery. Springer, Heidelberg
Porter JH, Nagy E, Kratz TK et al (2009) New eyes on the world: advanced sensors for ecology. BioSci 59:385–397
Porter JH, Hanson PC, Lin C-C (2012) Staying afloat in the sensor data deluge. Trends Ecol Evol 27:121–129
Sansone S-A, Rocca-Serra P, Field D et al (2012) Toward interoperable bioscience data. Nat Genet 44:121–126. doi:10.1038/ng.1054
Schimel D, Keller M, Berukoff S et al (2011) NEON science strategy: enabling continental-scale ecological forecasting. NEON, Inc., Boulder, CO
Vision TJ (2010) Open data and the social contract of scientific publishing. BioSci 60:330–330. doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.5.2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Michener, W.K. (2018). Project Data Management Planning. In: Recknagel, F., Michener, W. (eds) Ecological Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59928-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59928-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59926-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59928-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)