Advertisement

Conclusions

Chapter
  • 404 Downloads

Abstract

This book combines political economy and social practice perspectives to highlight the challenges of achieving wellbeing goals under postgrowth. Our review of assumptions about wellbeing in postgrowth debates first highlights potential problems with theories of adaptive preferences. While preferences may easily adapt upwards when living standards improve, the concept of loss aversion and evidence on wellbeing in times of economic crisis suggest that they do not adapt equally well downwards. Second, social practice theory helps us understand the enormous challenges which will be involved in decoupling the generation of wellbeing from its current embeddedness in growth-based market capitalism and a range of other closely linked structures. Conceptually, the debate should focus on basic human needs as is it compatible with postgrowth premises. Finally, institutional contexts, especially those that promote greater social equality, will be crucial for supporting wellbeing under postgrowth.

Keywords

Postgrowth Wellbeing Social practices Political economy Human needs 

References

  1. Deaton, A. 2008. Income, Health, and Well-Being Around the World: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 (2): 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Doyal, L., and I. Gough. 1991. A Theory of Human Need. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Easterlin, R.A., L.A. McVey, M. Switek, O. Sawangfa, and J.S. Zweig. 2010. The Happiness-Income Paradox Revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 (52): 22463–22468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jackson, T., and P.A. Victor. 2016. Does Slow Growth Lead to Rising Inequality? Some theoretical reflections and numerical simulations. Ecological Economics 121: 206–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Koch, M., H. Buch-Hansen, and M. Fritz. 2017. Shifting Priorities in Degrowth Research: An Argument for the Centrality of Human Needs. Ecological Economics 138: 74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. O’Neill, D. 2015. The Proximity of Nations to a Socially Sustainable Steady-State Economy. Journal of Cleaner Production 108: 1213–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Offe, C. 1984. Contradictions of the Welfare State, ed. John Keane. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Steinberger, J.K., and J.T. Roberts. 2010. From Constraint to Sufficiency: The Decoupling of Energy and Carbon from Human Needs, 1975–2005. Ecological Economics 70 (2): 425–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1991. Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (4): 1039–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wilkinson, R.G., and K.E. Pickett. 2009. The Spirit Level. Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  11. Wright, E.O. 2013. Transforming Capitalism Through Real Utopias. American Sociological Review 78 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and EnvironmentUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Lund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations