Advertisement

Gift and Beneficence

  • Simon Reader
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy book series (PASEPP)

Abstract

Resistance to procreative liberty is often framed in language about life’s giftedness, and the impropriety of choosing gifts in the persons of one’s children. This chapter examines Michael Sandel’s treatment of this argument and further flawed attempts to distinguish the gift from the merely given. Against the idea of children as gifts, anti-natalism contends that life is never so good as to justify being given, and Procreative Beneficence that we ought to choose the best possible lives. This chapter argues that both positions retain an ethic of giftedness, but instead figures parents as giving rather than receiving gifts in their children, where in the case of Procreative Beneficence the capacity to give life well follows from the purposive selections enabled by assisted reproductive technologies.

Keywords

Gift Procreative beneficence Children Chance Anti-natalism Reproduction 

References

  1. Archard, D. “Wrongful Life.” Philosophy 79, no. 309 (Jul 2004): 403–420.Google Scholar
  2. Benatar, David. Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence. Oxford: Clarendon, 2006.Google Scholar
  3. Buchanan, Allen E., Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels, and Daniel Wikler. From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. Caplan, Arthur. “Good, Better or Best?” In Human Enhancement, edited by Julian Savulescu and Nick Bostrom, 199–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  5. Denier, Yvonne. “From Brute Luck to Option Luck? On Genetics, Justice, and Moral Responsibility in Reproduction.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35, no. 2 (2010): 101–29.Google Scholar
  6. Feinberg, Joel. Freedom and Fulfillment: Philosophical Essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. Harris, J. “Sex Selection and Regulated Hatred.” Journal of Medical Ethics 31, no. 5 (May 2005): 291–94.Google Scholar
  8. Hauskeller, M. “Human Enhancement and the Giftedness of Life.” Philosophical Papers 40, no. 1 (2011): 55–79.Google Scholar
  9. HFEA. “Sex Selection: Options for Regulation. A Report on the HFEA’s 2002–2003 Review of Sex Selection Including Discussion of Legislative and Regulatory Options.” http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Final_sex_selection_main_report.pdf, 2003.
  10. Hyde, Lewis. The Gift: How the Creative Spirit Transforms the World. Edinburgh: Canongate, 2007.Google Scholar
  11. Kass, Leon. “Ageless Bodies, Happy Souls.” The New Atlantis 1 (2003): 9–28.Google Scholar
  12. Kavka, G. S. “The Paradox of Future Individuals.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 11, no. 2 (1982): 93–112.Google Scholar
  13. Moore, G. E. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: The University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
  14. Parfit, Derek. Reasons and Persons. Oxford, Oxfordshire: Clarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  15. Pinker, Steven. The Better Angels of Our Nature: The Decline of Violence in History and Its Causes. London: Allen Lane, 2011.Google Scholar
  16. Robertson, John A. Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. Sandel, Michael J. The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Cambridge, Mass; London: Belknap Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  18. Savulescu, J., and G. Kahane. “The Moral Obligation to Create Children with the Best Chance of the Best Life.” Bioethics 23, no. 5 (Jun 2009): 274–90.Google Scholar
  19. Schopenhauer, Arthur. Studies in Pessimism: A Series of Essays. [S.l.]: Swan Sonnenschein, 1900.Google Scholar
  20. Scully, J. L., T. Shakespeare, and S. Banks. “Gift Not Commodity? Lay People Deliberating Social Sex Selection.” Sociology of Health & Illness 28, no. 6 (Sep 2006): 749–67.Google Scholar
  21. Shakespeare, Tom. “‘Losing the Plot’? Medical and Activist Discourses of Contemporary Genetics and Disability.” Sociology of Health & Illness 21, no. 5 (1999): 669–88.Google Scholar
  22. Singer, Peter. “Parental Choice and Human Improvement.” In Human Enhancement, edited by Julian Savulescu and Nick Bostrom, 277–291. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  23. ———. “Should This Be the Last Generation?” New York Times, June 6, 2010.Google Scholar
  24. Sophocles, Eamon Grennan, and Rachel Kitzinger. Oedipus at Colonus [Translated from the Ancient Greek.]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Keele UniversityNewcastle-under-LymeUK

Personalised recommendations