Abstract
Modern and developing forms of selective reproduction have created new procreative choices for prospective parents which pit inclusive social values against personal parental preferences for one’s own child. A liberal eugenic current of thought has become predominant in mainstream bioethics, commending the prenatal selection of one’s children, where possible, over wider social or moral concerns about the nature of the world this creates. This opening chapter accounts for the development of a liberal eugenic orthodoxy, detailing the presumptions of liberty, moral considerability and the parity of genetic and environmental influences that support a permissive procreative liberty.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Agar, Nicholas. Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement. Malden, Mass; Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
Archard, David. “Genetic Enhancement and Procreative Autonomy.” Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1, no. 1, (2007).
Buchanan, Allen E., Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels, and Daniel Wikler. From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Chief Medical Officers. Abortion Statistics, England & Wales: 2015. edited by Department of Health. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/570040/Updated_Abortion_Statistics_2015.pdf 2015.
Clarke, A. “Is Non-Directive Genetic Counselling Possible?”. Lancet 338, no. 8773 (1991): 998.
Dworkin, Ronald. Life’s Dominion: An Argument About Abortion and Euthanasia. London: HarperCollins, 1993.
Evans, John, and Cynthia Schairer. “Bioethics and Human Genetic Engineering.” In Handbook of Genetics and Society: Mapping the New Genomic Era, edited by Paul Atkinson, Peter Glaser and Margaret Lock. Oxford: Routledge, 2009.
Feinberg, Joel. Freedom and Fulfillment: Philosophical Essays. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1992.
Galton, Francis Sir. Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. [S.l.]: J. M. Dent and Co, 1883.
Goleniowski, Hayley. Downs Side Up. http://www.downssideup.com/ Accessed 9th March 2017.
Habermas, Jurgen. The Future of Human Nature. Cambridge: Polity, 2003.
Harris, John. “Sex Selection and Regulated Hatred.” Journal of Medical Ethics 31, no. 5 (May 2005): 291–294.
———. Enhancing Evolution: The Ethical Case for Making Better People. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2007.
———. The Value of Life. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985.
———. “Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act.” http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/37/pdfs/ukpga_19900037_en.pdf 1990.
———. “Sex Selection: Options for Regulation. A Report on the HFEA’s 2002–2003 Review of Sex Selection Including Discussion of Legislative and Regulatory Options.” http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Final_sex_selection_main_report.pdf 2003.
Jacob, Jennifer. “(Unexpected) Stories of a Down Syndrome Diagnosis.” http://www.missiont21.com/prenatal. Accessed 9th March 2017.
Jones, David Albert. The Soul of the Embryo: An Enquiry into the Status of the Human Embryo in the Christian Tradition. London: Continuum, 2004.
Koch, T. “Bioethics as Ideology: Conditional and Unconditional Values.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31, no. 3 (Jun 2006): 251–267.
Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. London: Penguin, 2010.
Miller, Barara. “Down Syndrome: Parents Say They Feel Pressure to Terminate Pregnancy after Diagnosis.” ABC News, http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-22/down-syndrome-parents-pressured-to-terminate-pregnancy/8033216. Accessed 9th March 2017.
Mohr, James Crail. Abortion in America: The Origins and Evolution of National Policy, 1800–1900. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978.
Oliver, Kelly. Technologies of Life and Death—from Cloning to Capital Punishment. New York: Fordham University Press, 2013.
Prusak, Bernard G. “Rethinking “Liberal Eugenics.” Hastings Center Report 35, no. 6 (2005): 31–42.
Rapp, Rayna. Testing Women, Testing the Fetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America. New York; London: Routledge, 1999.
Richards, Clare. A World without Down’s Syndrome? BBC Television, 2016.
Robertson, J. A. “Procreative Liberty and the Control of Conception, Pregnancy and Childbirth.” Virginia Law Review 69, no. 3 (1983): 405–464.
Robertson, John A. Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
Rothman, Barbara Katz. The Tentative Pregnancy: How Amniocentesis Changes the Experience of Motherhood. New York: Norton, 1993.
Savulescu, J. “Procreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best Children.” Bioethics 15, no. 5–6 (2001): 413–426.
Scully, J. L., T. Shakespeare, and S. Banks. “Gift Not Commodity? Lay People Deliberating Social Sex Selection.” Sociology of Health & Illness 28, no. 6 (Sep 2006): 749–767.
Shakespeare, Tom. “Choices and Rights: Eugenics, Genetics and Disability Equality.” Disability & Society 13, no. 5 (1998): 665–681.
Singer, Peter. Rethinking Life & Death: The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Singer, Peter, and Helga Kuhse. Unsanctifying Human Life: Essays on Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.
Solomon, Andrew author. Far from the Tree: A Dozen Kinds of Love. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2012.
Stewart, Rory. “What is the opium of the people?” Intelligent Life, November/December 2013.
Wilkinson, Stephen. Choosing Tomorrow’s Children: The Ethics of Selective Reproduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Wolfenden, John Frederick Sir. Report of the Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution. [S.l.]: H.M.S.O., 1957.
Woodhead, Linda, and Norman Winter, eds. Religion and Personal Life. London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reader, S. (2017). Bioethical Burdens of Proof. In: The Ethics of Choosing Children. Palgrave Studies in Ethics and Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59864-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59864-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59863-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59864-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)