Advertisement

Leisure in the Community: Negative Effects

Chapter
  • 438 Downloads
Part of the Leisure Studies in a Global Era book series (LSGE)

Abstract

Certain kinds of leisure are unwelcome by certain segments of society or in certain parts of town. Do these negative effects of leisure have a place in the laity’s common sense images? To answer this question, this negative view of leisure is first considered within the larger frame of leisure as positive activity. Next, the negative effects of casual, serious, and project-based leisure are taken up. Meanwhile, some leisure is intolerably deviant, whereas other activities are new to society and are therefore in the course of being examined by the general public for their moral implications. Another quality that characterizes some leisure is its annoyingness. Selfishness would also seem to be imputed especially to those who perpetrate deviant and annoying leisure acts.

Keywords

Leisure’s negatives images Serious leisure Casual leisure Project-based leisure Deviant leisure New leisure Annoying leisure Brutal leisure Selfishness 

References

  1. Carothers, P., Vaske, J. J., & Donnelly, M. P. (2001). Social values versus interpersonal conflict among hikers and mountain bikers. Leisure Sciences, 23, 23–47.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, E. (1984). The sociology of tourism: Approaches, issues, and findings. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Durkin, K. F. (2007). Show me the money: Cybershrews and on-line money masochists. Deviant Behavior, 28, 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Economist (The). (2016). Whizz kids: A fledging sport ready for lift-off, 13 February, p. 66.Google Scholar
  5. Juniu, S., & Henderson, K. (2001). Problems in researching leisure and women: Global considerations. World Leisure Journal, 43(4), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Karsten, L., & Pel, E. (2000). Skateboarders exploring urban public space: Ollies, obstacles and conflicts. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 15, 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lieber, R. (2015). New worry for home buyers: A party house next door. New York Times, 10 October (online edition).Google Scholar
  8. Malone, M. (2012). 13 gross items to skip for your holiday celebration. Retrieved October 12, 2015, from http://www.gurl.com/2012/12/02/home-holiday-decorating-gross-gifts
  9. Murano, G. (2013). 11 front lawn decorations that sparked controversy. Retrieved October 11, 2015, from http://www.oddee.com/item_98759.aspx
  10. Roe, M., & Benson, J. F. (2001). Planning for conflict resolution: Jet-ski use on the Northumberland Coast. Coastal Management, 29, 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Seminara, D. (2016). Cup stacking: A sport whose growth runneth over. New York Times, 1 April (online edition).Google Scholar
  12. Stebbins, R. A. (1995). Leisure and selfishness: An exploration. In G. S. Fain (Ed.), Reflections on the philosophy of leisure, Vol. II, Leisure and ethics (pp. 292–303). Reston, VA: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance.Google Scholar
  13. Stebbins, R. A. (1996a). The barbershop singer: Inside the social world of a musical hobby. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stebbins, R. A. (1996c). Cultural tourism as serious leisure. Annals of Tourism Research, 23, 948–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stebbins, R. A. (2009b). New leisure and leisure customization. World Leisure Journal, 51(2), 78–84.Google Scholar
  16. Stebbins, R. A. (2013d). Work and leisure in the Middle-East: The common ground of two separate worlds. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  17. Woo, E., Uysal, M., & Sirgy, M. J. (2016). Tourism impact and stakeholders quality of life. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. doi: 10.1177/1096348016654971 (online edition).
  18. Zuzanek, J. (2014). Sunday blues: Have Sunday time use and its emotional connotations changed over the past two decades? Time & Society, 23(1), 6–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations