Skip to main content

The Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces of Englishes in South Korea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Korean Englishes in Transnational Contexts
  • 451 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the centripetal and centrifugal forces of Korean Englishes constructed in South Korean young adults’ translingual dialogues at language exchange sessions. While centripetal forces unify the forms of languages and their associated verbal-ideological worlds, centrifugal forces decentralize the norms and ideologies of language. Qualitative analysis of the dialogues revealed the following: on the one hand, the young adults construct centripetal ideologies in dialogues, resulting in the isolation of native speakers of English, the privileging of their varieties, and an unequal distribution of linguistic authority among Koreans; on the other hand, centrifugal forces diversify the norms of Englishes, embed the voices and identities of Koreans, and allow for transgressing boundaries across codes. The two forces intersect in dialogues, simultaneously shaping Korean Englishes in unifying and decentralizing ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. K. (2012). Exploring the washback of the TOEIC in South Korea: A sociocultural perspective on student test activity. PhD thesis, The University of Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byean, H. (2015). English, tracking, and neoliberalization of education in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 867–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (2014). Theorizing a competence for translingual practice at the contact zone. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education. Abington, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, I. C. (2008). The impact of EFL testing on EFL education in Korea. Language Testing, 25(1), 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On “lingua franca” English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(2), 237–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, C. (2009). English as a local language: Post-colonial identities and multilingual practices. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. Y. (2007). The dynamics of ethnic name maintenance and change: Cases of Korean ESL immigrants in Toronto. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28(2), 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. Y. (2010). Socio-political influences on EFL motivation and attitudes: Comparative surveys of Korean high school students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(2), 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. Y. (2015). The sociocultural meaning of English learning and its implication to English education: Four sociological approaches. Studies in English Language & Literature, 31(3), 105–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, C. B. (2012). The Korean English linguistic landscape. World Englishes, 31(1), 70–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. S. (2006). Linguistic constructions of modernity: English mixing in Korean television commercials. Language in Society, 35(1), 59–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. S. (2014). English on Korean television. World Englishes, 33(1), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, Y. (2011). Successful ELF communications and implications for ELT: Sequential analysis of ELF pronunciation negotiation strategies. Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 97–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, S. J. (2015). Evaluating the TOEIC® in South Korea: Practicality, reliability and validity. International Journal of Education, 7(1), 221–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. S. Y. (2009). The local construction of a global language: Ideologies of English in South Korea. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. S. Y. (2010). Naturalization of competence and the neoliberal subject: Success stories of English language learning in the Korean conservative press. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20(1), 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H. (2015). Language “skills” and the neoliberal English education industry. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(5), 509–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Korea. (2014). 2013nyeon sagyoyookbi josa [The analysis of spending on private education in 2013]. Retrieved from http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/13/1/index.board?bmode=download&bSeq=&aSeq=311886&ord=1 (viewed 24 January 2016).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kim, M. (2017). The Centripetal and Centrifugal Forces of Englishes in South Korea. In: Jenks, C., Lee, J. (eds) Korean Englishes in Transnational Contexts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59788-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59788-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59787-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59788-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics