Advertisement

Enhancing Neuropsychological Testing with Gamification and Tangible Interfaces: The Baking Tray Task

  • Antonio CerratoEmail author
  • Michela Ponticorvo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10338)

Abstract

Neuropsychological tests are performance-based tasks to evaluate cognitive functions, but often they are particularly long and boring during their execution; these issues can interfere with performance provided by patients or healthy participants. In this paper, we present our gamified and virtually enhanced version of a specific neuropsychological test: The Baking Tray Task (BTT), aimed to assess unilateral spatial neglect (USN), a visuospatial processing disorder. This enhanced BTT version has been developed through STELT (Smart Technologies to Enhance Learning and Teaching) software, a platform which allows implementation of augmented reality systems based on RFID/NFC technology. These materials permit to link together smart technologies and physical materials, uniting the manipulative approach and digitalized technologies.

Keywords

Adaptive learning Artificial Intelligence Gamification Technology enhanced assessment Unilateral spatial neglect 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project has been supported by INF@NZIA DIGI.tales, funded by Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research under PON-Smart Cities for Social Inclusion programme.

References

  1. 1.
    American Psychological Association: Committee on Professional Standards, American Psychological Association, Board of Scientific Affairs, and Committee on Psychological Tests and Assessment. Guidelines for Computer-Based Tests and Interpretations. The Association (1986)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Appelros, P., Karlsson, G.M., Thorwalls, A., Tham, K., Nydevik, I.: Unilateral neglect: further validation of the baking tray task. J. Rehabil. Med. 36(6), 258–261 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartolomeo, P., de Vito, S., Malkinson, T.S.: Space-related confabulations after right hemisphere damage. Cortex 87, 166–173 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benton, A.L., Van Allen, M.W.: Impairment in facial recognition in patients with cerebral disease. Cortex 4, 344–358 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benton, A.L., Varney, N.R., Hamsher, K.D.: Visuospatial judgment: a clinical test. Arch. Neurol. 35, 364–367 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beschin, N., Robertson, I.H.: Personal versus extrapersonal neglect: a group study of their dissociation using a reliable clinical test. Cortex 33(2), 379–384 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bisiach, E., Vallar, G.: Unilateral neglect in humans (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Canini, M., Battista, P., Della Rosa, P., Catrical, E., Salvatore, C., Gilardi, M., Castiglioni, I.: Computerized neuropsychological assessment in aging: testing efficacy and clinical ecology of different interfaces. Comput. Math. Methods Med. (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cerrato, A., Ferrara, F., Ponticorvo, M., Sica, L.S., Di Ferdinando, A., Miglino, O.: DILIGO assessment tool: a smart and gamified approach for preschool children assessment (in press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chokron, S., Bartolomeo, P.: Patterns of dissociation between left hemineglect and deviation of the egocentric reference. Neuropsychologia 35(11), 1503–1508 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dell’Aquila, E., Marocco, D., Ponticorvo, M., Di Ferdinando, A., Schembri, M., Miglino, O.: ENACT: virtual experiences of negotiation. Educational Games for Soft-Skills Training in Digital Environments. AGL, pp. 89–103. Springer, Cham (2017). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-06311-9_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deterding, S., Khaled, R., Nacke, L., Dixon, D.: Gamification: toward a definition. In: Proceedings of CHI Workshop on Gamification, Vancouver, BC, pp. 12–15 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Diller, L., Weinberg, J., Gordon, W., Goodkin, R., Gerstman, L.J., Ben-Yishay, Y.: Studies in cognition and rehabilitation in hemiplegia (1974)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doniger, G.M.: NeuroTrax computerized cognitive tests: test descriptions. NeuroTrax Brain Funct. Made Clear (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferber, S., Karnath, H.O.: How to assess spatial neglect-line bisection or cancellation tasks? J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 23(5), 599–607 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferrara, F., Ponticorvo, M., Di Ferdinando, A., Miglino, O.: Tangible interfaces for cognitive assessment and training in children: LogicART. In: Uskov, V.L., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Smart Education and e-Learning 2016. SIST, vol. 59, pp. 329–338. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-39690-3_29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goodenough, F.L.: Measurement of intelligence by drawings (1926)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Halligan, P.W., Marshall, J.C.: Left visuo-spatial neglect: a meaningless entity? Cortex 28, 525–535 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iachini, T., Ruggiero, G., Conson, M., Trojano, L.: Lateralization of egocentric and allocentric spatial processing after parietal brain lesions. Brain Cogn. 69(3), 514–520 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ishiai, S., Sugishita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gono, S., Watabiki, S.: Clock-drawing test and unilateral spatial neglect. Neurology 43(1 Part 1), 106 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Klatzky, R.L.: Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds.) Spatial Cognition. LNCS, vol. 1404, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). doi: 10.1007/3-540-69342-4_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lieberoth, A., Mrin, A.C., Mller, M.: Deep and shallow gamification - shaky evidence and the forgotten power of good games. In: Engaging Consumers Through Branded Entertainment and Convergent Media. IGI-Global, Hershey (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Menon, A., Korner-Bitensky, N.: Evaluating unilateral spatial neglect post stroke: working your way through the maze of assessment choices. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 11(3), 41–66 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Michael, D.R., Chen, S.L.: Serious Games: Games That Educate, Train, and Inform. Muska and Lipman/Premier-Trade (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miglino, O., Di Ferdinando, A., Di Fuccio, R., Rega, A., Ricci, C.: Bridging digital and physical educational games using RFID/NFC technologies. J. e-Learn. Knowl. Soc. 10, 89–106 (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Paillard, J.: Motor and representational framing of space. In: Brain and Space, pp. 163–182 (1991)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rapcsak, S.Z., Verfaellie, M., Fleet, W.S., Heilman, K.M.: Selective attention in hemispatial neglect. Arch. Neurol. 46, 178–182 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sahakian, B.J., Owen, A.M.: Computerized assessment in neuropsychiatry using CANTAB: discussion paper. J. R. Soc. Med. 85(7), 399 (1992)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schenkenberg, T., Bradford, D.C., Ajax, E.T.: Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology 30(5), 509 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Skalski, P., Dalisay, F., Kushin, M., Liu, Y.I.: Need for presence and other motivations for video game play across genres. In: Proceedings of the Presence Live (2012)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tham, K., Tegner, R.: The baking tray task: a test of spatial neglect. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 6, 19–25 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tong, T., Chignell, M., Tierney, M.C., Lee, J.: A serious game for clinical assessment of cognitive status: validation study. JMIR Serious Games 4(1), e7 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Urbanski, M., Angeli, V., Bourlon, C., Cristinzio, C., Ponticorvo, M., Rastelli, F., Thiebaut de Schotten, M., Bartolomeo, P.: Ngligence spatiale unilatrale: une consquence dramatique mais souvent nglige des lsions de lhmisphre droit. Revue Neurologique 163(3), 305–322 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., Modderman, J., Bas, M.: A test case for GameDNA: conceptualizing a serious game to measure personality traits. In: 2011 16th International Conference on Computer Games (CGAMES), pp. 217–222. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Willer, L., Pedersen, P.M., Gullach, A., Forchhammer, H.B., Christensen, H.K.: Abstract T P415: Assessment of cognitive symptoms in sub-acute stroke with an iPad test-battery (2015)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zichermann, G., Linder, J.: The Gamification Revolution: How Leaders Leverage Game Mechanics to Crush the Competition. McGraw-Hill Education, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zoccolotti, P., Antonucci, G., Judica, A.: Psychometric characteristics of two semi-structured scales for the functional evaluation of hemi-inattention in extrapersonal and personal space. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 2(3), 179–191 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Humanistic StudiesUniversity of Naples “Federico II”NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations