Skip to main content

Biomechanical Evaluation of Pre- and Post-bilateral Sagittal Split Mandibular Osteotomy on Three-Dimensional Models for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Finite Element Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 850 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Bioengineering ((LNBE))

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) is the hindrance of upper airway during sleep, associated with curtailment in blood oxygen saturation. It is characterized by subdual flow of oxygen to vital organs causing irregular heart rhythms. One of the triumphant surgeries to treat OSA is maxillo-mandibular advancement (MMA) which is found to be 90% successful for OSA patients (Phee 2015). In MMA, the lower jaw and the mid-face are progressed to augment the posterior airway space facilitating trouble-free breathing. In this research, we attempted to contemplate the von Mises stresses due to mastication in normal and osteotomed 3D models and identify the maximum stress that can be tolerated by the mandible using finite element analysis (FEA). FEA has been extensively used to solve complex problems in dentistry and researchers have found a high correlation between FEA simulation results and in vitro measurements for mandibular specimens (Erkmen et al. 2005). The location of screws and miniplate fixation in the 3D osteotomed models was determined by Champy’s lines in order to ensure stable fixation (Erkmen et al. 2005). We first evaluated the extent of movement of the posterior airway space that is mandatory for the OSA patients to breathe normally. It was evident that the airway constriction was corrected in the upper respiratory tract by the advancement of the mandible. The von Mises stress and displacement in the mandible before and after MMA by applying three different loads, incisal, contralateral compressive molar loads, and one-sided molar loads were analyzed to rule out the fixation and orthognathic issues. The stress distributions during mastication were furthermore compared for mandibular osteotomy models with two distinct lengths of advancement. In addition, the deflection by virtue of mastication on molars, incisors, and canines was also assessed. In line with the above-mentioned evaluation, we performed the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of the upper airway model with the pre- and post-surgical conditions to predict the airflow dynamics accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baek S-H, Cha H-S, Cha J-Y, Moon Y-S, Sung S-J (2012) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the deformation of the human mandible: a preliminary study from the perspective of orthodontic mini-implant stability. Korean J Orthod 42(4):159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas BK, Bag S, Pal S (2013) Biomechanical analysis of normal and implanted tooth using biting force measurement. ISSN 4:2305–8269

    Google Scholar 

  • Champy M, Loddé JP, Schmitt R, Jaeger JH, Muster D (1978) Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach. J Maxillofac Surg 6:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun KJ, Choi HH, Lee JY (2014) Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth. J Dent Biomech 5:1758736014520809

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkmen E, Simsek B, Yücel E, Kurt A (2005) Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: setback surgery-posterior loading. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feller BK-U, Schneider M, Hlawitschka M, Pfeifer G, Lauer G, Eckelt U (2003) Analysis of complications in fractures of the mandibular angle—a study with finite element computation and evaluation of data of 277 patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 31:290–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoneima A, AlBarakati S, Jiang F, Kula K, Wasfy T (2015) Computational fluid dynamics analysis of the upper airway after rapid maxillary expansion: a case report. Progr Orthod 16:10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li KK, Riley RW, Powell NB, Guilleminault C (2000) Maxillomandibular advancement for persistent obstructive sleep apnea after phase-I surgery in patients without maxillomandibular deficiency. Laryngoscope 110:1684–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phee BL (2015) Clinical outcomes of maxillo mandibular advancement surgery for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Electronic thesis and dissertation repository, paper 2654

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato FR, Asprino L, Consani S, Noritomi PY, de Moraes M (2012) A comparative evaluation of the hybrid technique for fixation of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement by mechanical, photoelastic, and finite element analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 114(Suppl 5):S60–S68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schendel SA, Broujerdi JA, Jacobson RL (2014) Three-dimensional upper-airway changes with maxillomandibular advancement for obstructive sleep apnea treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 146:385–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringhini DJ, Sommerfeld R, Uetanabaro LC, Leonardi DP, Araújo MR, Rebellato NL, da Costa DJ, Scariot R (2016) Resistance and stress finite element analysis of different types of fixation for mandibular orthognathic surgery. Braz Dent J 27(3):284–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi H, Moriyama S, Furuta H, Matsunaga H, Sakamoto Y, Kikuta T (2010) Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis. Head Face Med 6:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer D, Meyer U, Joos U, Vègh A, Piffko J (2000) Experimental and finite element study of a human mandible. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 28:91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Elghobashi S (2014) On locating the obstruction in the upper airway via numerical simulation. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 193:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Won CHJ, Li KK, Guilleminault C (2008) Surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: upper airway and maxillomandibular surgery. Proc Am Thorac Soc 5:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wootton DM, Luo H, Persak SC, Sin S, McDonough JM, Isasi CR, Arens R (2014) Computational fluid dynamics endpoints to characterize obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children. J Appl Physiol 116:104–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank for support and clinical guidance given to us. Dr. Manikandan BDS, MDS, FDSRCS, FFDRCSI, FTPRM Oral And MaxilloFacial Surgeon, Implantologist, Dentist, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Albert Einstein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aishwarya, S., Albert Einstein, G., Nandhini, S., Vinod, K.M. (2018). Biomechanical Evaluation of Pre- and Post-bilateral Sagittal Split Mandibular Osteotomy on Three-Dimensional Models for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Using Finite Element Analysis. In: Gefen, A., Weihs, D. (eds) Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Bioengineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59764-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59764-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59763-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59764-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics