Advertisement

A Similarity Measure Based on Care Trajectories as Sequences of Sets

  • Yann RivaultEmail author
  • Nolwenn Le Meur
  • Olivier Dameron
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10259)

Abstract

Comparing care trajectories helps improve health services. Medico-administrative databases are useful for automatically reconstructing the patients’ history of care. Care trajectories can be compared by determining their overlapping parts. This comparison relies on both semantically-rich representation formalism for care trajectories and an adequate similarity measure. The longest common subsequence (LCS) approach could have been appropriate if representing complex care trajectories as simple sequences was expressive enough. Furthermore, by failing to take into account similarities between different but semantically close medical events, the LCS overestimates differences. We propose a generalization of the LCS to a more expressive representation of care trajectories as sequences of sets. A set represents a medical episode composed by one or several medical events, such as diagnosis, drug prescription or medical procedures. Moreover, we propose to take events’ semantic similarity into account for comparing medical episodes. To assess our approach, we applied the method on a care trajectories’ sample from patients who underwent a surgical act among three kinds of acts. The formalism reduced calculation time, and introducing semantic similarity made the three groups more homogeneous.

Keywords

Care trajectories LCS-based similarity Semantic similarity 

References

  1. 1.
    Tuppin, P., de Roquefeuil, L., Weill, A., Ricordeau, P., Merlière, Y.: French national health insurance information system and the permanent beneficiaries sample. Rev. Epidemiol. Sante Publique 58, 286–290 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moulis, G., Lapeyre-Mestre, M., Palmaro, A., Pugnet, G., Montastruc, J.-L., Sailler, L.: French health insurance databases: what interest for medical research? Rev. Med. Interne 36, 411–417 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jay, N., Nuemi, G., Gadreau, M., Quantin, C.: A data mining approach for grouping and analyzing trajectories of care using claim data: the example of breast cancer. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 13, 130 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Le Meur, N., Gao, F., Bayat, S.: Mining care trajectories using health administrative information systems: the use of state sequence analysis to assess disparities in prenatal care consumption. BMC Health Serv. Res. 15, 200 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pesquita, C., Faria, D., Falcão, A.O., Lord, P., Couto, F.M.: Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000443 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Girardi, D., Wartner, S., Halmerbauer, G., Ehrenmüller, M., Kosorus, H., Dreiseitl, S.: Using concept hierarchies to improve calculation of patient similarity. J. Biomed. Inform. 63, 66–73 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Studer, M., Ritschard, G.: A comparative review of sequence dissimilarity measures. LIVES Work. Pap. 2014, 1–47 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hirschberg, D.S.: A linear space algorithm for computing maximal common subsequences. Commun. ACM 18, 341–343 (1975)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bellman, R.: The theory of dynamic programming. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 60, 503–515 (1954)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu, Z., Palmer, M.: Verbs semantics and lexical selection. In: Presented at the Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, 27 June 1994Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yann Rivault
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • Nolwenn Le Meur
    • 1
    • 4
  • Olivier Dameron
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.EHESP Rennes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, EA 7449 REPERES, Recherche en Pharmaco-Epidémiologie et Recours aux SoinsRennesFrance
  2. 2.Université de Rennes 1RennesFrance
  3. 3.IRISA équipe DylissRennesFrance
  4. 4.PEPS, Pharmacoepidemiology for Health Products SafetyRennesFrance

Personalised recommendations