Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Progress in Mathematics ((PM,volume 323))

Abstract

We give a short introduction to Beyond Endoscopy, a proposal by Langlands for attacking the general principle of functoriality. We shall try to motivate the proposal by emphasizing its structural similarities with the actual theory of endoscopy. We shall then discuss a few of the many problems that will need to be solved, some of which are suggested by the recent work of A. Altuğ.

To Roger Howe on the occasion of his seventieth birthday

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One also has to make limited use of the twisted trace formula for the quasisplit, special orthogonal groups SO(2n).

  2. 2.

    It is simplest to think of I(f) as an object with no independent characterization. In other words, it is defined explicitly by either of the two expansions.

  3. 3.

    This language is slightly misleading. It refers to the parameters ψ rather than the representations in the expected packets \(\Pi _{\psi }\), which will often remain cuspidal for parameters that are nontrivial on the factor SU(2) in (12).

  4. 4.

    Also called a Satake class.

  5. 5.

    We are assuming that L(s, π, r) and L V(s, π, r) have the same order at s = 1, as is expected.

  6. 6.

    The formula cannot be literally true, since the summands θ f(a) are not the restriction to \(a \in \mathcal{A}(F)\) of a natural Schwartz function on \(\mathcal{A}(\mathbb{A})\). Since we are only trying to describe the basic ideas, we shall ignore this question.

  7. 7.

    We shall generally quote from this thesis, although the results from Chap. 5 of the thesis are easier to extract from the subsequent paper [Al2].

  8. 8.

    Altuğ actually truncates the left-hand side of (22) in order not to deal with weighted orbital integrals, so it is actually a slight simplification of (22) that is established.

  9. 9.

    This phenomenon applies only to the modification of the limit (19) discussed in II, wherein the logarithmic derivative of (14) is replaced by the L-function itself. I thank Altuğ for pointing out that if one sticks with the original logarithmic derivative, the elliptic and parabolic limits are in fact both equal to zero. (See [L6, Sect. 2.3].) The dichotomy here, which entails an examination of weighted orbital integrals for GL(2), might be a good place to begin a study of the questions raised in II.

References

  1. S.A. Altuğ, Beyond Endoscopy via the Trace Formula, PhD Thesis, Princeton University, (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. to3em___________________________ Beyond endoscopy via the trace formula-I: Poisson summation and isolation of special representations, Compositio Mathematica, (2015), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. to3em__________ Beyond endoscopy via the trace formula-II: Asymptotic expansions of Fourier transforms of orbital integrals and bounds towards the Ramanujan’s conjecture, To appear in Amer. J. Math.

    Google Scholar 

  4. to3em_____________________ Beyond endoscopy via the trace formula-III, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. An, J.-K. Yu, and J. Yu, On the dimension datum of a subgroup and its application to isopectral manifolds, Journal of Differential Geometry, 94 (2013), 59–85.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Arthur, The invariant trace formula II. Global theory, Journal of American Mathematical Society, 1 (1988), 223–293.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. to3em__________________________________________________ , A stable trace formula I. General expansions, Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, 1 (2002), 175–277.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. to3em____________ , A stable trace formula II. Global descent, Inventiones Mathematicae, 143 (2001), 157–220.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. to3em , A stable trace formula III. Proof of the main theorems, Annals of Mathematics, 158 (2003), 769–873.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. to3em_____________________________________________________________________ , A note on the automorphic Langlands group, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, 45 (2002), 466–482.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. to3em________________ , An introduction to the trace formula, in Harmonic Analysis, the Trace Formula, and Shimura Varieties, Clay Mathematics Proceedings, vol. 4, (2005), 1–263.

    Google Scholar 

  12. to3em_ , An asymptotic formula for real groups, Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 601 (2006), 163–230.

    Google Scholar 

  13. to3em__________ , Parabolic transfer for real groups, Journal of American Mathematical Society, 21 (2008), 171–234.

    Google Scholar 

  14. to3em_ , The Endoscopic Classification of Representations: Orthogonal and Symplectic Groups, Colloquium Publications, 61 (2013), American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  15. to3em________________ , Germ expansions for real groups, preprint (under revision).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Bouthier, B.C. Ngô, and Y. Sakellaridis, On the formal arc space of a reductive monoid, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Braverman, and D. Kazhdan, γ-functions of representations and lifting, in Visions in Mathematics, 2000, 237–278.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Frenkel, R.P. Langlands, and B.C. Ngô, La formule des traces et la functorialité, Le début d’un programme, Annales des Sciences Mathématiques du Québec, 34 (2010), 199–243.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Getz, Nonabelian Fourier transforms over the complex numbers, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Getz, and P.E. Herman, A nonabelian trace formula, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P.E. Herman, Quadratic base change and the analytic continuation of the AsaiL-function: A new trace formula approach, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Iwaniec, and E. Kowalski, Analytic Number Theory, Colloquium Publications, 53 (2004), American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Jacquet, and R.P. Langlands, Automorphic forms onGL(2), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 114 (1970), Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Kazhdan, and G. Lusztig, Fixed point varieties on affine flag manifolds, Israel Journal of Mathematics, 62 (1988), 129–168.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Kottwitz, Stable trace formula: cuspidal tempered terms, Duke Mathematical Journal, 51 (1984), 611–650.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. R. Kottwitz, and D. Shelstad, Foundations of Twisted Endoscopy, Astérisque, 255 (1999), Societe Mathématique de France.

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. Lafforgue, Noyaux du transfert automorphe de Langlands et formules de Poisson non linéaires, Japanese Journal of Mathematics, 9 (2014), 1–68.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. R. Langlands, Letter to André Weil, 1967, publications.ias.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  29. to3em________________________________ , Problems in the theory of automorphic forms, in Lectures in Modern Analysis and Applications, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 170, Springer, New York, 1970, 18–61.

    Google Scholar 

  30. to3em_____________ , Automorphic representations, Shimura varieties, and motives. Ein Märchen, in Automorphic Forms, Representations andL-functions, Proceedings of Symposium in Pure Mathematics, vol. 33, Part 2, American Mathematical Society, 1979, 205–246.

    Google Scholar 

  31. to3em____________________________________________________________ , Base Change forGL(2), Annals of Mathematics Studies, 96 (1980), Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. to3em___________________________________________________________ , Les débuts d’une formule des traces stable, Publications mathématiques de l’Université Paris VII, 13 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  33. to3em______________ , Beyond endoscopy, in Contributions to Automorphic Forms, Geometry, and Number Theory, John Hopkins University Press, 2004, 611–698.

    Google Scholar 

  34. to3em__________ , Singularités et transfert, Annales mathématiques du Québec, 37 (2013), 173–253.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. to3em____________________________________________________________________ , A prologue to functoriality and reciprocity: Part 1, Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 260 (2012), 583–663.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. R. Langlands, and D. Shelstad, On the definition of transfer factors, Mathematische Annalen, 278 (1987), 219–271.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. C. Moeglin and J.-L. Waldspurger, Stabilisation de la formule des traces tordue, Volume 1, Progress in Mathematics 316, Birkhauser, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  38. C. Moeglin and J.-L. Waldspurger, Stabilisation de la formule des traces tordue, Volume 2, Progress in Mathematics 317, Birkhauser, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  39. C.P. Mok, Endoscopic classification of representations of quasi-split unitary groups, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 235 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  40. B.C. Ngô, Le lemme fondamental pour les algébres de lie, Publications mathématiques de l’IHÉS, 111 (2010), 1–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. to3em______________________________________ , On a certain sum of automorphicL-functions, in Automorphic Forms and Related Geometry, Contemporary Mathematics, 614 (2014), 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Y. Sakellaridis, Beyond endoscopy for the relative trace formula I: local theory, in Automorphic Representations andL-functions, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, 2013, 521–590.

    Google Scholar 

  43. P. Sarnak, Comments on Langlands’ Lecture: ”Endoscopy and Beyond”, 2001, publications.ias.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  44. J.-P. Serre, Abelianl-adic representations and elliptic curves, Benjamin, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  45. A. Venkatesh, Beyond endoscopy and special forms onGL(2), Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 577 (2004), 23–80.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. J.-L. Waldspurger, Le lemme fondamental implique le transfert, Compositio Mathematica, 105 (1997), 153–236.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. to3em_______________________________________________________________ , Endoscopie et changement de caractéristique, Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, 5 (2006), 423–525.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. to3em__________________________________________________________________________________ , Stabilisation de la formule des traces tordue I: endoscopie tordue sur un corps local, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  49. to3em_____ , Stabilisation de la formule des traces tordue II: intégrales orbitales et endoscopic sur un corps local non-archimédien; définitions et énonceés des résultats, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

  50. J. Yu, On the dimension datum of a subgroup, preprint.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Arthur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arthur, J. (2017). Problems Beyond Endoscopy. In: Cogdell, J., Kim, JL., Zhu, CB. (eds) Representation Theory, Number Theory, and Invariant Theory. Progress in Mathematics, vol 323. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59728-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics