Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Minimally Invasive Retroperitoneal Transpsoas Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Essentials of Spinal Stabilization

  • 1255 Accesses

Abstract

MIS spine surgeons have rapidly adopted the retroperitoneal transpsoas approach since its first introduction in 2001. Its use has been greatly expanded from simple indirect decompression from degenerative disc disease to complex spinal deformity correction and traumatic vertebral fractures. The technique offers a rapid approach to the disc space and availability of variety of large interbody grafts with excellent fusion rates whether used as stand-alone, with lateral plating, or with pedicle screw instrumentation for support. The advantage of using retroperitoneal transpsoas approach is faster operative time, less anesthesia to the patient, quicker recovery, and lower blood loss. However, thorough anatomical understanding of the surrounding lumbar plexus and meticulous technique must be observed to avoid potential serious complications. In this chapter we examine crucial surgical anatomy necessary for a successful outcome, provide detailed surgical technical notes, discuss surgical indications and patient selection, and finally review all potential complications and complication avoidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2006;6:435–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pimenta L. Lateral endoscopic transpsoas retroperitoneal approach for lumbar spine surgery. In: VIII Brazilian Spine Society meeting. Belo Horizo te, Minas Gerais; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benglis DM, Elhammady MS, Levi AD, Vanni S. Minimally invasive anterolateral approaches for the treatment of back pain and adult degenerative deformity. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:191–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eck JC, Hodges S, Humphreys SC. Minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15:321–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Uribe JS, Vale FL, Dakwar E. Electromyographic monitoring and its anatomical implications in minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine. 2010;35:S368–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang MY, Anderson DG, Poelstra KA, Ludwig SC. Minimally invasive posterior fixation. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:197–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergey DL, Villavicencio AT, Goldstein T, Regan JJ. Endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. Spine. 2004;29:1681–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dakwar E, Vale FL, Uribe JS. Trajectory of the main sensory and motor branches of the lumbar plexus outside the psoas muscle related to the lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:290–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Netter FH. Atlas of human anatomy. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Uribe JS, Arredondo N, Dakwar E, Vale FL. Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;13:260–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gray H, Williams PL, Bannister LH. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of medicine and surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dakwar E, Le TV, Baaj AA, Le AX, Smith WD, Akbarnia BA, Uribe JS. Abdominal wall paresis as a complication of minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;31:E18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harshavardhana NS, Dabke HV. The furcal nerve revisited. Orthop Rev. 2014;6:5428.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moro T, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Yaginuma H. An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery. Spine. 2003;28:423–8. discussion 427–428

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Benglis DM, Vanni S, Levi AD. An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009;10:139–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahmadian A, Deukmedjian AR, Abel N, Dakwar E, Uribe JS. Analysis of lumbar plexopathies and nerve injury after lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: diagnostic standardization. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18:289–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Regev GJ, Chen L, Dhawan M, Lee YP, Garfin SR, Kim CW. Morphometric analysis of the ventral nerve roots and retroperitoneal vessels with respect to the minimally invasive lateral approach in normal and deformed spines. Spine. 2009;34:1330–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oxland TR, Lund T. Biomechanics of stand-alone cages and cages in combination with posterior fixation: a literature review. Eur. Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2000;9(Suppl 1):S95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS. Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Youssef JA, McAfee PC, Patty CA, Raley E, DeBauche S, Shucosky E, Chotikul L. Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review. Spine. 2010;35:S302–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR 2nd, Glassman SD, Johnson JR. Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:2089–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Oda T, Haku T, Yamamoto T, Iwasaki M. Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4:304–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Anand N, Rosemann R, Khalsa B, Baron EM. Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM, Okonkwo DO, Kanter AS. Complications and radiographic correction in adult scoliosis following combined transpsoas extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang MY, Mummaneni PV. Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V. Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine. 2010;35:2224–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mundis GM, Akbarnia BA, Phillips FM. Adult deformity correction through minimally invasive lateral approach techniques. Spine. 2010;35:S312–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Glassman SD, Hamill CL, Bridwell KH, Schwab FJ, Dimar JR, Lowe TG. The impact of perioperative complications on clinical outcome in adult deformity surgery. Spine. 2007;32:2764–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yadla S, Maltenfort MG, Ratliff JK, Harrop JS. Adult scoliosis surgery outcomes: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Deukmedjian AR, Dakwar E, Ahmadian A, Smith DA, Uribe JS. Early outcomes of minimally invasive anterior longitudinal ligament release for correction of sagittal imbalance in patients with adult spinal deformity. TheScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:789698.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Uribe JS, Harris JE, Beckman JM, Turner AW, Mundis GM, Akbarnia BA. Finite element analysis of lordosis restoration with anterior longitudinal ligament release and lateral hyperlordotic cage placement. Eur. Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2015;24(Suppl 3):420–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lafage V, Schwab F, Vira S, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP. Spino-pelvic parameters after surgery can be predicted: a preliminary formula and validation of standing alignment. Spine. 2011;36:1037–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Leary SP, Regan JJ, Lanman TH, Wagner WH. Revision and explantation strategies involving the CHARITE lumbar artificial disc replacement. Spine. 2007;32:1001–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Patel AA, Brodke DS, Pimenta L, Bono CM, Hilibrand AS, Harrop JS, Riew KD, Youssef JA, Vaccaro AR. Revision strategies in lumbar total disc arthroplasty. Spine. 2008;33:1276–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wagner WH, Regan JJ, Leary SP, Lanman TH, Johnson JP, Rao RK, Cossman DV. Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charite lumbar artificial disc replacement. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:1266–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Smith WD, Dakwar E, Le TV, Christian G, Serrano S, Uribe JS. Minimally invasive surgery for traumatic spinal pathologies: a mini-open, lateral approach in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Spine. 2010;35:S338–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang JJ, Yu CH, Chang BS, Yeom JS, Lee JH, Lee CK. Subsidence and nonunion after anterior cervical interbody fusion using a stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011;3:16–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Brantigan JW, Steffee AD. A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine. 1993;18:2106–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC. Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages. Surg Neurol. 2004;62:378–85. discussion 385–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Matge G. Cervical cage fusion with 5 different implants: 250 cases. Acta Neurochir. 2002;144:539–49. discussion 550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Boakye M, Mummaneni PV, Garrett M, Rodts G, Haid R. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion involving a polyetheretherketone spacer and bone morphogenetic protein. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:521–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vaidya R, Sethi A, Bartol S, Jacobson M, Coe C, Craig JG. Complications in the use of rhBMP-2 in PEEK cages for interbody spinal fusions. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:557–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Closkey RF, Parsons JR, Lee CK, Blacksin MF, Zimmerman MC. Mechanics of interbody spinal fusion. Analysis of critical bone graft area. Spine. 1993;18:1011–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lowe TG, Hashim S, Wilson LA, O’Brien MF, Smith DA, Diekmann MJ, Trommeter J. A biomechanical study of regional endplate strength and cage morphology as it relates to structural interbody support. Spine. 2004;29:2389–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pearcy MJ, Evans JH, O’Brien JP. The load bearing capacity of vertebral cancellous bone in interbody fusion of the lumbar spine. Eng Med. 1983;12:183–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bess RS, Cornwall G, Vance R, Bachus KN, Brodke DS. Biomechanics of lateral arthrodesis. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 2008. p. 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cappuccino A, Cornwall GB, Turner AW, Fogel GR, Duong HT, Kim KD, Brodke DS. Biomechanical analysis and review of lateral lumbar fusion constructs. Spine. 2010;35:S361–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Knight RQ, Schwaegler P, Hanscom D, Roh J. Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: early complication profile. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22:34–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cummock MD, Vanni S, Levi AD, Yu Y, Wang MY. An analysis of postoperative thigh symptoms after minimally invasive transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;15:11–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Pimenta L, Oliveira L, Schaffa T, Coutinho E, Marchi L. Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:38–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Patterson J. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases. Spine. 2011;36:26–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Januszewski J, Keem SK, Smith W, Beckman JM, Kanter AS, Oskuian RJ, Taylor W, Uribe JS. The potentially fatal Ogilvie’s syndrome in lateral transpsoas access surgery: a multi-institutional experience with 2930 patients. World Neurosurg 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Maloney N, Vargas HD. Acute intestinal pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie’s syndrome). Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2005;18:96–101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Ponec RJ, Saunders MD, Kimmey MB. Neostigmine for the treatment of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:137–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Vanek VW, Al-Salti M. Acute pseudo-obstruction of the colon (Ogilvie’s syndrome). An analysis of 400 cases. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;29:203–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hooten KG, Oliveria SF, Larson SD, Pincus DW. Ogilvie’s syndrome after pediatric spinal deformity surgery: successful treatment with neostigmine. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;14:255–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Dua K, Kepler CK, Huang RC, Marchenko A. Vertebral body fracture after anterolateral instrumentation and interbody fusion in two osteoporotic patients. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2010;10:e11–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Le TV, Smith DA, Greenberg MS, Dakwar E, Baaj AA, Uribe JS. Complications of lateral plating in the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16:302–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Disch AC, Knop C, Schaser KD, Blauth M, Schmoelz W. Angular stable anterior plating following thoracolumbar corpectomy reveals superior segmental stability compared to conventional polyaxial plate fixation. Spine. 2008;33:1429–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kozak JA, Heilman AE, O’Brien JP. Anterior lumbar fusion options. Technique and graft materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994:45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Le TV, Baaj AA, Dakwar E, Burkett CJ, Murray G, Smith DA, Uribe JS. Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 2012;37:1268–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Dakwar E, Rifkin SI, Volcan IJ, Goodrich JA, Uribe JS. Rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure following minimally invasive spine surgery: report of 5 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:785–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Beckman JM, Vincent B, Park MS, Billys JB, Isaacs RE, Pimenta L, Uribe JS. Contralateral psoas hematoma after minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter review of 3950 lumbar levels. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA

    Jacob Januszewski DO & Juan S. Uribe MD

Authors
  1. Jacob Januszewski DO
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan S. Uribe MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Januszewski DO .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedics, David Geffen UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA

    Langston T. Holly

  2. Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin UWMF, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Paul A. Anderson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Januszewski, J., Uribe, J.S. (2017). The Minimally Invasive Retroperitoneal Transpsoas Approach. In: Holly, L., Anderson, P. (eds) Essentials of Spinal Stabilization . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59713-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59713-3_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59712-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59713-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation