Skip to main content

Provincial Integration Through the Senate: Trudeau’s (Not Quite) New Era

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 816 Accesses

Abstract

The controversy about the role of the Senate in Canada dates back to the very beginning of the Confederation. The lack of legitimacy of the Senators, the inability of the Upper House to be a forum where regional diversity is represented and the role of the House in the federal system have been the key issues.

In 2011 S. Harper tried to introduce several reforms in the House by a unilateral constitutional amendment made by the Parliament. After the discontent showed by some provinces—mainly Quebec–, the PM asked the Supreme Court about the constitutionality of his reform plan. The SC answer was clear: all the proposed reforms, but one, needed a constitutional amendment in accordance with section 38 of the 1982 Constitution. Therefore, a wide provincial support is needed. After this ruling the conservative government dropped its reform plans and Harper decided not to nominate anymore senators.

The liberals opposed Harper’s plan from the beginning and once Trudeau reached the leadership he started to put in place his own reform plans. Trudeau promised to review the role of the Senate in order to make the house less partisan and more independent by appointing independent and highly respected figures from the civil society. He promised that the provinces will have a say in the nomination of senators and that he will institute a consultation committee for the appointment process. To show his commitment he expelled the liberal senators form the party caucus, although the senators define themselves as independent-liberals.

But, how will these measures be compatible with the Constitution after the Supreme Court Reference? What will be the role of the new independent senators in the Upper House under Trudeau’s administration? Will the provinces’ influence in the House be expanded?

The purpose of this paper will be to analyze the impact that Trudeau’s reforms will have in the Dominion-Provincial relations, paying special attention to the case of Quebec and its role within the federation.

This manuscript was elaborated during a research stay at the Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales in Madrid (Spain) between September 2015 and March 2016. The final version was handed at the beginning of April 2018.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Regarding this issue, we can recall the proposed Quebec Charter of Values (Projet de loi n°60: Charte affirmant les valeurs de laïcité et de neutralité religieuse de l’État ainsi que d’égalité entre les femmes et les hommes et encadrant les demandes d’accommodement) and the recently passedLoi favorisant le respect de la neutralité religieuse de l’État et visant notamment à encadrer les demandes d’accommodements pour un motif religieux dans certains organismes, commonly know as Bill 62, that bans the veil in public places.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco J. Romero-Caro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Romero-Caro, F.J. (2019). Provincial Integration Through the Senate: Trudeau’s (Not Quite) New Era. In: López-Basaguren, A., Escajedo San-Epifanio, L. (eds) Claims for Secession and Federalism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59707-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59707-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59706-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59707-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics