The Scottish Independence Referendum: Lessons Learned for the Future

  • Elisenda Casanas-AdamEmail author


This chapter analyses the lessons learned from Scottish independence referendum as a model for future referendums held by sub-state national units to decide on their constitutional future, either for Scotland and further afield. It begins by highlighting the main positive aspects of the process. It argues that the Scottish independence referendum was an example of political negotiation and agreement between the Scottish and UK governments that provided a solid legal framework for the referendum, including the setting of a clear, neutral and independently tested question. This enabled an extensive informed and deliberative process focused on the central issue to be decided: independence for Scotland. The chapter then considers two factors that added unnecessary uncertainty to the referendum debate and had an impact on the decisiveness of the outcome. The first was the importance of continuing EU membership for Scotland and the lack of a clear position in EU law on what would happen in the case of a ‘Yes’ vote. The second was the removal of the intermediate option between ‘independence’ and the ‘status quo’ from the ballot paper, despite it being the preferred option of a significant majority of Scottish citizens. The chapter concludes that a clear and effectively neutral position from the EU would be required to avoid this issue affecting the debate and decision on an internal constitutional issue, and that more generally a multi-option referendum may be more suited to providing an encompassing debate on the sub-state national unit’s constitutional future and a more decisive outcome.


Plurinational state Federalism Scotland Catalonia 


  1. Anderson G, Bell C, Craig S, MacHarg A, Mullen T, Tierney S, Walker N (2012) The independence referendum, legality and the contested constitution: widening the debate. UK Constitutional Law Blog. Available at:
  2. Aroney N (2014) Reserved matters, legislative purpose and the referendum on Scottish independence. Public Law:422–445Google Scholar
  3. BBC (2014) Scottish independence: Barroso says joining EU would be ‘difficult’. BBC News. Available at:
  4. Boyle A, Crawford J (2013) Opinion: referendum on the independence of Scotland – international law aspects. Annex A. In: UK Government (ed) Scotland analysis: devolution and the implications of Scottish independence. Available at:
  5. Boyle K, Tierney S (2014) The vow delivered? Experts respond to the recommendations of the Smith Commission. Democratic Audit UK. Available at:
  6. Burgess M, Tarr GA (eds) (2012) Constitutional dynamics in federal systems. Sub-national perspectives. Forum of federations. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Ontario, 352 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrel S (2016) Second Scottish independence vote not yet on table, says Nicola Sturgeon. The Guardian. Available at:
  8. Carrell S (2012) Barroso casts doubt on independent Scotland’s EU membership rights. The Guardian. Available at:
  9. Carrell S (2014) Alex Salmond accepts defeat and presses for new Holyrood powers. The Guardian. Available at:
  10. Casanas Adam E (2014) Self-determination and the use of referendums: the case of Scotland. Int J Polit Cult Soc 27(1):47–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Casanas Adam E (2017) The constitutional court of Spain: from system-balancer to centralizing polarist, and now the central state’s enforcer? In: Aroney N, Kinkaid J (eds) Courts in federal countries: federalists or unitarists? University of Toronto Press, Toronto, ON, pp 367–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curtice J (2015) Scotland ‘One year On’: the legacy of the independence referendum. Discussion Paper, International Public Policy Institute, University of Strathclyde. Available at:
  13. Douglas-Scott S (2014a) How easily could an independent Scotland join the EU? University of Oxford Legal Research Paper Series. Paper No XXX/2014Google Scholar
  14. Hopkins S (2016) Nicola Sturgeon confirms intention to relaunch SNP’s independence campaign. The Huffington Post. Available at:
  15. Johnson S (2014) Nicola Sturgeon urged to stop referendum ‘betrayal bandwagon’. The Telegraph. Available at:
  16. Jovanovik MA (2009) Can constitutions be of use in the resolution of secessionist conflicts. J Int Law Int Rel 5(2):59–87Google Scholar
  17. Keating M (2012) Rethinking sovereignty. Independence-lite, devolution-max and national accommodation. Revista d’Estudis Federals i Autonomics 16:9–29Google Scholar
  18. Keating M (2015) The Scottish independence referendum and after. Revista d’Estudis Federals i Autonomics 21:73–98Google Scholar
  19. Kellner P (2013) EU referendum: provincial England versus London and the Celts. YouGov. Available at:
  20. McHarg A (2014a) Further devolution and the unionists’ credibility gap. Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum Blog. Available at:
  21. McHarg A (2014c) The referendum: memorandum agreement and draft section 30 order. Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum Blog. Available at:
  22. Macnab S (2016a) Nicola Sturgeon: ‘I will win case for independence’. The Scotsman. Available at:
  23. Macnab S (2016b) Nicola Sturgeon: Brexit will make Indyref2 ‘highliy likely’. The Scotsman. Available at:
  24. Merrilees I (2014) Excluding Scotland from the EU: definitely difficult; probably impossible. Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum Blog. Available at:
  25. Ormston R, Curtice J (2013) The option not on the table. Attitudes to more devolution. Scotcen Social Research. Available at:
  26. Parliament of Catalonia (2013) Resolution 5/X of the Parliament of Catalonia, adopting the Declaration of sovereignty and of the right to decide of the people of Catalonia. Available at:
  27. Remirez C (2014) Rajoy: ‘Mientras yo sea presidente del Gobierno, ni se celebrará ese referéndum ilegal ni se fragmentará España. Que quede claro’. El Mundo. Available at:
  28. Ridoch L (2013) Uncertainty is a starting point too. The Scotsman. Available at:
  29. Scottish Conservatives (2014) Commission on the Future Goverment of Scotland. Available at:
  30. Scottish Executive (2007) Choosing Scotland’s future – a national conversation. Available at
  31. Scottish Government (2009) Your Scotland your voice. Available at
  32. Scottish Government (2010) Scotland’s future: draft referendum (Scotland) Bill Consultation Paper. Available at:
  33. Scottish Government (2012) Your Scotland, your referendum. Available at:
  34. Scottish Government (2013a) Scotland’s future: from the referendum to independence and a written constitution. Available at:
  35. Scottish Government (2013b) Scotland’s future. Your guide to an independent Scotland. Available at:
  36. Scottish Labour (2014) Powers for a purpose. Strengthening accountability and empowering people. Available at:
  37. Scottish Liberal Democrats (2014) Campbell II. The second report of the home and community rule commission. Available at:
  38. Swanson I (2013) Is Salmond only offering us independence-lite? The Scotsman. Available at:
  39. The Electoral Commission (2013) Referendum on independence for Scotland: advice of the Electoral Commission on the Proposed Referendum Question. Available at:
  40. Tierney S (2004) Constitutional law and national pluralism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 392 ppGoogle Scholar
  41. Tierney S (2007) ‘We the Peoples’: constituent power and constitutionalism in plurinational states. In: Loughlin M, Walker N (eds) The paradox of constitutionalism: constituent power and constitutional form. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 229–246Google Scholar
  42. Tierney S (2012) Constitutional referendums. The theory and practice of republican deliberation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 352 ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tierney S (2013a) Legal issues surrounding the referendum on independence for Scotland. Eur Constit Law Rev 3:359–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tierney S (2013b) The multi-option referendum: international guidelines, international practice and practical issues. Edinburgh Law School Research Paper Series. No 2013/33. Available at:
  45. Tierney S (2014) ‘And the winner is… .the Referendum’: Scottish Independence and he Deliberative Participation of Citizens. Int’l J Const L Blog. Available at:
  46. Tierney S (2015a) Direct democracy in the United Kingdom: reflections from the Scottish independence referendum. Public Law (4):633–651Google Scholar
  47. Tierney S (2015b) Sovereignty and crimea: how referendum democracy complicates constituent power in multinational societies. Ger Law J 16(3):523–541Google Scholar
  48. Tomkins A (2012) The Scottish parliament and the independence referendum. UK Constitutional Law Blog. Available at:
  49. Trench A (2013) Scottish independence: does taking a sterling currency union off the table change the game? UK Constitutional Law Association Blog. Available at:
  50. UK Government (2013) Scotland analysis: devolution and the implications of Scottish independence. Available at:
  51. UK Government (2014) Scottish independence referendum: statement by the Prime Minister. Prime Minister’s Office. Available at:
  52. UK Government and Scottish Government (2012) Agreement between the United Kingdom Government and the Scottish Government on a referendum on independence for Scotland. Available at:
  53. Vintro J (2012) Legality and the referendum on independence in Catalonia. Blog del IDP. Available at:
  54. Walker N (2013) Scotland’s constitutional future: interdependent independence or independent interdependence. Edinburgh Law School Research Paper Series. No 2013/05. Available at:
  55. Walker N (2015) Beyond secession? Law in the framing of the national polity. In: Tierney S (ed) Nationalism and globalisation. Hart, Oxford, pp 155–185Google Scholar
  56. Whitaker A (2014) Independence: Juncker ‘sympathetic’to Scots EU bid. The Scotsman. Available at:

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Edinburgh Law SchoolEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations