Abstract
Over the past few years, private labels have gained larger share in the organized retail sector. The influence of price similarity and dissimilarity on consumers’ judgments of a private label’s quality and purchase intention is studied using a controlled experiment with a sample of 356 respondents. Hypotheses are derived from relevant literature positing the effects of packaging and price on quality perception and willingness-to-buy. We hypothesize that higher price difference between private labels and national brands positively affect quality perceptions and inversely influence purchase intention. Experiments indicate that similarity of a private label packaging with a national brand has a significant effect on perceived quality and purchase intention. Likewise, the interaction effect of price and packaging strategies (imitation), in turn, positively influences the dependent variables. The results are significant the consumer packaged goods category (cookies). Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed followed by the limitation and future research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aribarg, A., Arora, N., Henderson, T., & Kim, Y. (2014). Private label imitation of a national brand: Implications for consumer choice and law. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(6), 657–675.
Beneke, J., Greene, A., Lok, I., & Mallett, K. (2012). The influence of perceived risk on purchase intent-the case of premium grocery private label brands on South Africa. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 21, 4–14.
Coelho do Vale, R., & Verga Matos, P. (2015). The impact of copycat packaging strategies on the adoption of private labels. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 24(6), 646–659.
Collins-Dodd, C., & Lindley, T. (2003). Store brands and retail differentiation: The influence of store image and store brand attitude on store own brand perceptions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10(6), 345–352.
Cudmore, A. B. (2000). The effect of store image, package and price similarity on consumer perceptions of store brand quality. Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Carolina.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 307–319.
Hoch, S. J., & Lodish, L. M. (1998). Store brands and category management (pp. 1–38). Philadelphia, PA: The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
Hyman, M. R., Kopf, D. A., & Lee, D. (2010). Review of literature–Future research suggestions: Private label brands: Benefits, success factors and future research. Journal of Brand Management, 17(5), 368–389.
Kalwani, M. U., & Yim, C. K. (1992). Consumer price and promotion expectations: An experimental study. Journal of marketing Research, 29(1), 90–100.
Kumar, N., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. (2007). Private label strategy: How to meet the store brand challenge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Loken, B., Ross, I., & Hinkle, R. L. (1986). Consumer ‘confusion’ of origin and brand similarity perceptions. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 5, 195–211.
Olbrich, R., & Jansen, H. C. (2014). Price-quality relationship in pricing strategies for private labels. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 23, 429–438.
Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1989). The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perceptions of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 351–357.
Richardson, P. S., Dick, A. S., & Jain, A. K. (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 28–36.
Sarkar, S., Sharma, D., & Kalro, A. D. (2016). Private label brands in an emerging economy: An exploratory study in India. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 44(2), 203–222.
Sethuraman, R., & Gielens, K. (2014). Determinants of store brand share. Journal of Retailing., 90(2), 141–153.
Sinha, I., & Batra, R. (1999). The effect of consumer price consciousness on private label purchase. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16, 237–251.
Steenkamp, J. B. E. (1990). Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research, 21(4), 309–333.
Tversky, A. (2004). Preference, belief, and similarity: Selected writings. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
van Horen, F., & Pieters, R. (2012). Consumer evaluation of copycat brands: The effect of imitation type. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(3), 246–255.
Yuan, H., & Han, S. (2011). The effects of consumers’ price expectations on sellers’ dynamic pricing strategies. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 48–61.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sarkar, S., Rawani, M. (2017). Consumers’ Responses to Private Labels: Evaluations Extrinsic Cues Imitations. In: Martínez-López, F., Gázquez-Abad, J., Ailawadi, K., Yagüe-Guillén, M. (eds) Advances in National Brand and Private Label Marketing. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59701-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59701-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59700-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59701-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)