Skip to main content

Long-Lived Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCCN,volume 10299))

Abstract

The predominant notion for specifying problems to study distributed computability are tasks. Notable examples of tasks are consensus, set agreement, renaming and commit-adopt. The theory of task solvability is well-developed using topology techniques and distributed simulations. However, concurrent computing problems are usually specified by objects. Tasks and objects differ in at least two ways. While a task is a one-shot problem, an object, such as a queue or a stack, typically can be invoked multiple times by each process. Also, a task, defined in terms of sets, specifies its responses when invoked by each set of processes concurrently, while an object, defined in terms of sequences, specifies the outputs the object may produce when it is accessed sequentially.

In a previous paper we showed how tasks can be used to specify one-shot objects (where each process can invoke only one operation, only once). In this paper we show how the notion of tasks can be extended to model any object. A potential benefit of this result is the use of topology, and other distributed computability techniques to study long-lived objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Borowsky, E., Gafni, E.: Immediate atomic snapshots and fast renaming. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 1993), pp. 41–51. ACM Press (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borowsky, E., Gafni, E., Lynch, N., Rajsbaum, S.: The BG distributed simulation algorithm. Distrib. Comput. 14(3), 127–146 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandra, T.D., Hadzilacos, V., Jayanti, P., Toueg, S.: Generalized irreducibility of consensus and the equivalence of \(t\)-resilient and wait-free implementations of consensus. SIAM J. Comput. 34(2), 333–357 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Castañeda, A., Rajsbaum, S., Raynal, M.: Specifying concurrent problems: beyond linearizability and up to tasks. In: Moses, Y. (ed.) DISC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9363, pp. 420–435. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48653-5_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman, R., Vitenberg, R., Chokler, G.: On the composability of consistency conditions. Inf. Process. Lett. 86(4), 169–176 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gafni, E.: Snapshot for time: the one-shot case, 10 pages (2014). arXiv:1408.3432v1

  7. Herlihy, M., Kozlov, D., Rajsbaum, S.: Distributed Computing Through Combinatorial Topology, 336 pages. Morgan Kaufmann/Elsevier (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herlihy, M., Rajsbaum, S., Raynal, M.: Power and limits of distributed computing shared memory models. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 509, 3–24 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hemed, N., Rinetzky, N.: Brief announcement: concurrency-aware linearizability. In: Proceedings of the 33th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2014), pp. 209–211. ACM Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hemed, N., Rinetzky, N., Vafeiadis, V.: Modular verification of concurrency-aware linearizability. In: Moses, Y. (ed.) DISC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9363, pp. 371–387. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-662-48653-5_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Herlihy, M., Wing, J.: Linearizability: a correctness condition for concurrent objects. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 12(3), 463–492 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moran, S., Wolfstahl, Y.: Extended impossibility results for asynchronous complete networks. Inf. Process. Lett. 26(3), 145–151 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Neiger, G.: Set-linearizability. Brief announcement in Proc. 13th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 1994), p. 396. ACM Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Armando Castañeda was supported by UNAM-PAPIIT project IA102417. Sergio Rajsbaum was supported by UNAM-PAPIIT project IN109917. Part of this work was done while Sergio Rajsbaum was at École Polytechnique and Paris 7 University. Michel Raynal was supported the French ANR project DESCARTES (grant 16-CE40-0023-03) devoted to distributed software engineering. This work was also partly supported by the INRIA-UNAM Équipe Associée LiDiCo (at the Limits of Distributed Computing).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armando Castañeda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Castañeda, A., Rajsbaum, S., Raynal, M. (2017). Long-Lived Tasks. In: El Abbadi, A., Garbinato, B. (eds) Networked Systems. NETYS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10299. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59647-1_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59647-1_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59646-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59647-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics