Advertisement

Methods and Techniques for Climate Resilient and Low-Carbon Smart City Planning

  • Kwi-Gon KimEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

This chapter addresses methods and techniques for climate resilient and low-carbon smart city planning in more detail through the analysis of selected practices. There have been a number of urban planning methods and techniques over the past few decades. However, there is a lack of sufficient connectivity in planning options. How to actually link the smart grid with urban planning for the digitalization of cities is a real challenge. Thanks to the recent tech revolution, the digital planning revolution is coming to us. Innovative methods derived from virtual reality and the spatial network revolution and techniques provide useful tools to connect urban planning and climate change with ICT. A framework and its components are provided to incorporate land development tools, adaptation and mitigation measures, and physical infrastructure development as an integrated solution.

Keywords

Innovative methods and techniques Land development Smart digital zoning Low emissions development Low impact development Adaptation planning Physical infrastructure development Intelligent operation Low-carbon economic development The 6th industry 

References

  1. Amoroso N (2012) Digital landscape architecture now. Thames & Hudson, UK, p 10Google Scholar
  2. Ecologic Institute and Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University Centre for the Environment (2011) Assessment approaches to climate change adaptation and mitigation in Europe, Final report to the European Commission, Service Contract no. 070307/2010/580412/SER/B2, p 2, p 23Google Scholar
  3. EU Delegational in Seoul (2016) The final report on the EU-Korean platform on green urban development and low-carbon economyGoogle Scholar
  4. European Union (2013) Building a green infrastructure for EuropeGoogle Scholar
  5. Hargreaves G (2012) Digital landscape architecture now. Thames & Hudson, UK, p 7Google Scholar
  6. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Ioppolo G, Saija G, Salomone R (2013) From coastal management to environmental management: the sustainable eco-tourism program for the mid-western coast of Sardinia (Italy). Land Use Policy 31:460–471Google Scholar
  8. Lindell MK, Prater CS (2002) Risk area residents’ perceptions and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments1. J Appl Soc Psychol 32(11):2377–2392Google Scholar
  9. Nath SK et al. (2008) Site amplification, Qs and source parameterization in Guwahati region from seismic and geotechnical analysis. Seis Res Lett 79:498–511Google Scholar
  10. New York City Panel on Climate Change (2010) Climate change adaptation in New York City building a risk management response. pp 267–275Google Scholar
  11. Olshansky RB, Wu Y (2001) Earthquake risk analysis for Los Angeles county under present and planned land uses. Environ Plan B: Plan Design 28(3):419–432Google Scholar
  12. Ortolano L (1984) Environmental planning and decision making. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and Climate Analytics (2013) Turn down the heatGoogle Scholar
  14. Smith K (2001) Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster, 3rd edn. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. UCLG (2015) Key positioning of local and regional governments on local eco-nomic development. Third world forum on local economic development, 13–16 Oct, Turin, p 4Google Scholar
  16. US EPA (2013) Adaptation strategies guide for water utilities. EPA 817-k-13-001, Mar 2013, pp 2–3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Seoul National UniversitySeoulKorea (Republic of)
  2. 2.UCLLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations