Advertisement

Evolution of Climate Resilience and Low-Carbon Smart City Planning: A Process

  • Kwi-Gon KimEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

This chapter presents the global impacts of urbanization on urban ecosystems and their services, planning responses to climate change, and case studies and examines the emergence of climate resilient and low-carbon smart urbanism. Climate as one of the ecosystem services also is impacted by urbanization. The planet is very sensitive to climate change, and exposure to climate-driven natural disasters will increase. In a context where by 2050, almost 70% of the total world population will be living in towns and cities, and the climate resilience planning will become increasingly critical. Based on the selected case studies, energy conservation, low-carbon green city design, and impact assessments of urbanization on environment and climate change were found to be complementary tools for climate resilience planning. The emergence of a smart climate approach bringing together (1) eco-city, (2) sustainable city, and (3) conventional low-carbon green city approaches into the climate resilient and low-carbon smart city development will generate a much higher value added at lower cost.

Keywords

Urbanization Climate change Urban ecosystem Planning responses Eco-city Sustainable city Low-carbon green city Guidelines Climate resilience planning Smart climate urbanism Value added 

References

  1. Abelson P (1979) Cost benefit analysis and environmental problems. Saxon House, FarnboroughGoogle Scholar
  2. Bisset RA (1984) Selected EIA methodologies. Paper presented at the international training course on environmental impact assessment and land-use planning, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  3. Canter LW (1977) Environmental impact assessment. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Climate Action, 7 Dec 2016Google Scholar
  5. Douglas I (1983) The Urban Environment, Baltmore, MD, Edward ArnoldGoogle Scholar
  6. Fellor G (2016) Internet of everything: revitalizing cities, citizens, and urban systems. June 6, 2016, unpagedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilies A (1978) A new town and agriculture: the milton keynes case. Built Environ 4(2):134–141Google Scholar
  8. Harwood CC (1977) Using land to save energy, environmental law Institute state and local energy coservation project. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  9. Haveman RH (1983) The economic evaluation of long-run uncertainties. In: O’Riordan T, Turner RK (eds) Annotated reader in environmental planning and management, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 122–31Google Scholar
  10. Horn J (2016) 3 benefits a smart city can gain from smart infrastructure, Posted on Dec 14, 2016 in Smart CitiesGoogle Scholar
  11. Kelly JR (1975) Planned and unplanned new town impacts: applying a method. Environ Behav 7(3):330–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim K-G (1983) Environmental impact assessment of new town development project: the case of Gwacheon New Town, Republic of Korea. UNEP ReportGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim K-G (1984) Environmental assessment of major urban development—new towns. Paper presented at the international training course on environmental impact assessment and land-use planning, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim K-G (1986) Energy flow and conservation in urban systems. UNESCO, Paris, p 128Google Scholar
  15. Kim K-G (2010) Urban development model for the low carbon green city: the case of Gangneung. Green Korea 2010 strengthening global green growth strategy and green economy, United Nations, Green Growth Korea and National Research Council for Economics, Humanities and Social Sciences, pp 245–273Google Scholar
  16. Lichfield N (1968) Economics in town planning. Town Plann Rev 39(1968):5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lichfield N, Chapman H (1970) Cost benefit analysis in urban expansion: a case study, Ipswich. Urban Stud 7(2):153–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lichfield N, Kettle P, Whitebread M (1975) Evaluation in the planning process. Pergamon Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McAllister DM (1980) Evaluation in environmental planning: assessing environmental, social, economic and political trade-offs. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Milton Keynes (1982) Energy projects in Milton Keynes. Energy Consultative Unit Progress Report 1976–1988Google Scholar
  21. Munn RE (ed) (1979) Environmental impact assessment. Scope 5, Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  22. Nash C, Pearce D, Stanley J (1973) An evaluation of cost-benefit analysis criteria. Scott J Polit Econ XXII(2):121–124Google Scholar
  23. Ortolano L (1984) Environmental planning and decision making. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Owens S (1984) Energy, planning and urban form. Pion, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Pearce DW (1976) Measuring the economic impact of environmental change. In: O’Riordan T, Hey RD (eds) Environmental impact assessment. Saxon House, Farnborough, pp 142–166Google Scholar
  26. Pearce DW (1983a) Accounting for the Future. In: O’Riordan T, Turner RK (eds) Annotated Reader in Environmental Planning and Management. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 117–122Google Scholar
  27. Pearce D.W (1983b) Cost-Benefit Analysis. London, Macmillian, second editionGoogle Scholar
  28. Turner RK, O’Riordan T (1982) Project Evaluation. In: Haynes RM (ed) Environmental science methods. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 372–398Google Scholar
  29. UN-DESA (2011) World urbanization prospects-the 2007 revision, p 5Google Scholar
  30. World Bank (2011) Turn down the heat: why a 4℃ warmer world must be avoidedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Seoul National UniversitySeoulKorea (Republic of)
  2. 2.UCLLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations