Skip to main content

Influence of DEM Uncertainty on the Individual-Based Modeling of Dispersal Behavior: A Simple Experiment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 906 Accesses

Part of the book series: Advances in Geographic Information Science ((AGIS))

Abstract

It is generally accepted that the perceptual range of an animal towards different landscape elements can influence its movement through heterogeneous landscapes. Dispersal movement is a determining factor in the spread of species as well as metapopulation dynamics. An individual-based, spatially explicit model with an isotropic perceptual range was used to simulate the dispersal movement of grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis). The effects of anisotropic perceptual range are modeled by incorporating digital elevation model (DEM) data in the representation of the landscape so that line-of-sight analysis can be used to arrive at an anisotropic perceptual range. This simple experiment uses Monte Carlo simulation to study the effect DEM uncertainty may have on the simulated movements of individuals. Mean displacement distance and straightness index are used to measure the effect of DEM uncertainty on the walks taken by individuals. The habitat patch terminus for each individual was used to determine if individuals would end in the same patch for each simulation. Two perceptual ranges of differing extent were used. For both measures of movement behavior they vary more when the larger perceptual range is used. Results showed that the extent as well as the anisotropic nature of the perceptual range could affect an individual’s simulated behavior. The larger perceptual range more often resulted in greater deviation from baseline results. This experiment suggests that DEM uncertainty can have an effect on spatially explicit individual-based movement models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hawkes C (2009) Linking movement behavior, dispersal and population processes: is individual variation a key? J Anim Ecol 78:894–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hengeveld R (1994) Small step invasion research. Trends Ecol Evol 9:339–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Neigel JE, Avise JC (1993) Application of a random walk to geographic distributions of animal mitochondrial DNA variation. Genetics 135:1209–1220

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peakall R, Ruibal M, Lindenmayer DB (2003) Spatial autocorrelation analysis offers new insights into gene flow in the Australian bush rat, Rattus fuscipes. Evolution 57(5):1182–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hansson L (1991) Dispersal and connectivity in metapopulations. Biol J Linn Soc 42:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevenson CD, Ferryman M, Nevin OT, Ramsey AD, Bailey S, Watts K (2013) Using GPS telemetry to validate least-cost modeling of gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) movement within a fragmented landscape. Ecol Evol 3(7):2350–2361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Anthony LL, Blumstein DT (2000) Integrating behaviour into wildlife conservation: the multiple ways that behaviour can reduce N-e. Biol Conserv 95:303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lima SL, Zollner PA (1996) Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vuilleumier S, Metzger R (2006) Animal dispersal modeling: Handling landscape features and related animal choices. Ecol Model 190:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kareiva P, Wennergren U (1995) Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes. Nature 373:299–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. King AW, With KA (2002) Dispersal success on spatially structured landscapes: when do dispersal pattern and dispersal behavior really matter? Ecol Model 147:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kramer-Schadt S, Revilla E, Wiegand T, Breitenmoser U (2004) Fragmented landscapes, road mortality, and patch connectivity: modelling dispersal for the Eurasian lynx in Germany. J Appl Ecol 41:711–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tischendorf L, Fahrig L (2000) How should we measure landscape connectivity? Landsc Ecol 15:633–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiegand T, Moloney K, Naves J, Knauer F (1999) Finding the missing link between landscape structure and population dynamics: a spatially explicit perspective. Am Nat 154:605–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alderman J, McCollin D, Hinsley SA, Bellamy PE, Picton P, Crockett R (2005) Modelling the effects of dispersal and landscape configuration on population distribution and viability in fragmented habitat. Landsc Ecol 20:857–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gardner RH, Gustafson EJ (2004) Simulating dispersal of reintroduced species within heterogenous landscapes. Ecol Model 171:339–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Graf RF, Kramer-Schadt S, Fernandez N, Grimm V (2007) What you see is where you go? Modeling dispersal in mountainous landscapes. Landsc Ecol 22:853–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lurz PWW, Rushton SP, Wauters LA, Bertolino S, Currado I, Massoglio P, Shirley MDF (2001) Predicting grey squirrel expansion in North Italy: a spatially explicit modelling approach. Landsc Ecol 16:407–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson VB, Graniero PA (2005) Spatially explicit individual-based ecological modeling with mobile fuzzy agents. In: Petry FE, Robinson VB, Cobb MA (eds) Fuzzy modeling with spatial information for geographic problems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 299–334

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. South A (1999) Extrapolating from individual movement behavior to population spacing patterns in a ranging mammal. Ecol Model 117:343–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zollner PA (2000) Comparing the landscape level perceptual abilities of forest sciurids in fragmented agricultural landscapes. Ecology 80:1019–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Olden JD, Schooley RL, Monroe JB, Poff NP (2004) Context-dependent perceptual ranges and their relevance to animal movements in landscapes. J Anim Ecol 73(6):1190–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pe’er G, Kramer-Schadt S (2008) Incorporating the perceptual range of animals into connectivity models. Ecol Model 213(1):73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Robinson VB (2002) Using fuzzy spatial relations to control movement behavior of mobile objects in spatially explicit ecological models. In: Matsakis P, Sztandera LM (eds) Applying soft computing in defining spatial relations. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 158–178

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ruckelshaus M, Hartway C, Kareiva P (1997) Assessing the data requirements of spatially explicit dispersal models. Conserv Biol 11:1298–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Robinson VB (2010) Exploring the sensitivity of fuzzy decision models to landscape information inputs in a spatially explicit individual-based ecological model. In: Kacprzyk J, Petry FE, Yazici A (eds) Uncertainty approaches for spatial data modeling and processing: a decision support perspective. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 29–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. La Morgia V, Malenotti E, Badino G, Bona F (2011) Where do we go from here? Dispersal simulations shed light on the role of landscape structure in determining animal redistribution after reintroduction. Landsc Ecol 26:969–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Weschler SP, Kroll CN (2006) Quantifying DEM uncertainty and its effect on topographic parameters. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 72(9):1081–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nixon CM, Havera SP, Greenberg RE (1978) Distribution and abundance of the gray squirrel in Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey Biological Notes 105, Illinois, Champaign, p 55

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wauters A, Lurz PW, Gurrell J (2000) Interspecific effects of grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis) on the space use and population demography of red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris). Ecol Res 15:271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Graniero PA, Robinson VB (2006) A probe mechanism to couple spatially explicit agents and landscape models in an integrated modeling framework. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(9):965–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Koprowski JL (1994) Sciurus carolinensis. Mamm species 480:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thompson DC (1978) The social system of the grey squirrel. Behaviour 64:305–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wolff JO (1999) Behavioral model systems. In: Barrett GW, Peles JD (eds) Landscape ecology of small mammals. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 11–40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Natural Resources Canada (2006) Canadian Digital Elevation Data – 030M12 [computer file]. Sherbrooke, Quebec

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (2002) Ontario Land Cover Data [computer file]. Toronto, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  38. Almeida PJAL, Vieira MV, Kajin M, Forero-Medina G, Cerqueira R (2010) Indices of movement behavior: conceptual background, effects of scale, and location errors. Zoologica 27(5):674–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Swihart RK, Slade NA (1985) Testing for independence of observations in animal movements. Ecology 66(4):1176–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  41. Baker WL, Cai Y (1992) The r.le programs for multiscale analysis of landscape structure using the GRASS geographical information system. Landsc Ecol 7(4):291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. GRASS Development Team (2010) Geographic Resources Analysis Support System (GRASS) Software version 6.4.0RC6. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://grass.osgeo.org

  43. R Development Core Team (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 2.10.1). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org

  44. Bellman RE, Zadeh LA (1970) Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manag Sci 17:141–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (1998) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  46. Howard WE (1960) Innate and environmental dispersal of individual vertebrates. Am Midl Nat 63:152–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mech SG, Zollner PA (2002) Using body size to predict perceptual range. Oikos 98:47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pe’er G, Heinz SK, Frank K (2006) Connectivity in heterogeneous landscapes: analyzing the effect of topography. Landsc Ecol 21:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The partial support of a Discovery Grant RGPIN-386183 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent B. Robinson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robinson, V.B. (2018). Influence of DEM Uncertainty on the Individual-Based Modeling of Dispersal Behavior: A Simple Experiment. In: Thill, JC., Dragicevic, S. (eds) GeoComputational Analysis and Modeling of Regional Systems. Advances in Geographic Information Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59511-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics