Advertisement

Controlled Experiment in Business Model-Driven Conceptual Database Design

  • Drazen BrdjaninEmail author
  • Goran Banjac
  • Danijela Banjac
  • Slavko Maric
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 287)

Abstract

The paper presents the initial results of a controlled experiment that we conducted with professional database designers in order to evaluate an approach to automated design of the initial conceptual database model based on collaborative business process models. The source business process model is represented by BPMN, while the target conceptual model is represented by UML class diagram. The preliminary results confirm already obtained results in case-study based evaluation, as well as the results of an earlier controlled experiment conducted with undergraduate students. The evaluation implies that the proposed approach and implemented automatic generator enable the generation of the target conceptual model with a high percentage of completeness and precision.

Keywords

BPMN Collaborative business process model Conceptual database model Evaluation Experiment Model-driven UML 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all participants of the controlled experiment for their voluntary participation and valuable contribution.

References

  1. 1.
    Brdjanin, D., Maric, S.: Model-driven techniques for data model synthesis. Electronics 17(2), 130–136 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), v2.0. OMG (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    OMG: Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), v2.5. OMG (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brdjanin, D., Banjac, G., Maric, S.: Automated synthesis of initial conceptual database model based on collaborative business process model. In: Bogdanova, M.A., Gjorgjevikj, D. (eds.) ICT Innovations 2014: World of Data. AISC, vol. 311, pp. 145–156. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Banjac, D., Brdjanin, D., Banjac, G., Maric, S.: Evaluation of automatically generated conceptual database model based on collaborative business process model: controlled experiment. In: Stojanov, G., Kulakov, A. (eds.) ICT Innovations 2016. AISC. Springer (2016, in press)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rungworawut, W., Senivongse, T.: From business world to software world: Deriving class diagrams from business process models. In: Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Informatics and Communications, WSEAS, pp. 233–238 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rungworawut, W., Senivongse, T.: Using ontology search in the design of class diagram from business process model. PWASET 12, 165–170 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brambilla, M., Cabot, J., Comai, S.: Automatic generation of workflow-extended domain models. In: Engels, G., Opdyke, B., Schmidt, D.C., Weil, F. (eds.) MODELS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4735, pp. 375–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-75209-7_26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rodríguez, A., Fernández-Medina, E., Piattini, M.: Towards obtaining analysis-level class and use case diagrams from Business Process Models. In: Song, I.-Y., Piattini, M., Chen, Y.-P.P., Hartmann, S., Grandi, F., Trujillo, J., Opdahl, A.L., Ferri, F., Grifoni, P., Caschera, M.C., Rolland, C., Woo, C., Salinesi, C., Zimányi, E., Claramunt, C., Frasincar, F., Houben, G.-J., Thiran, P. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5232, pp. 103–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-87991-6_15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vara, J.L., Fortuna, M.H., Sánchez, J., Werner, C.M.L., Borges, M.R.S.: A Requirements Engineering Approach for Data Modelling of Process-Aware Information Systems. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2009. LNBIP, vol. 21, pp. 133–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-01190-0_12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brambilla, M., Cabot, J., Comai, S.: Extending conceptual schemas with business process information. Adv. Softw. Eng. 2010, Article ID 525121 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rodriguez, A., Guzman, I.G.-R., Fernandez-Medina, E., Piattini, M.: Semi-formal transformation of secure business processes into analysis class and use case models: an MDA approach. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(9), 945–971 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang, J., Feng, P., Wu, Z., Yu, D., Chen, K.: Activity based CIM modeling and transformation for business process systems. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 20(3), 289–309 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nikiforova, O., Pavlova, N.: Application of BPMN instead of GRAPES for two-hemisphere model driven approach. In: Grundspenkis, J., Kirikova, M., Manolopoulos, Y., Novickis, L. (eds.) ADBIS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5968, pp. 185–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-12082-4_24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    de la Vara, J.L.: Business process-based requirements specification and object-oriented conceptual modelling of information systems. PhD Thesis, Valencia Polytechnic University (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cruz, E.F., Machado, R.J., Santos, M.Y.: From business process modeling to data model: a systematic approach. In: Proceeding of QUATIC 2012, pp. 205–210. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Drozdová, M., Mokryš, M., Kardoš, M., Kurillová, Z., Papán, J.: Change of paradigm for development of software support for e-learning. In: Proceeding of ICETA 2012, pp. 81–84. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rhazali, Y., Hadi, Y., Mouloudi, A.: Transformation method CIM to PIM: from Business Processes Models defined in BPMN to use case and Class Models defined in UML. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. Control Eng. 8(8), 1334–1338 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cruz, E.F., Machado, R.J., Santos, M.Y.: Deriving a data model from a set of interrelated Business Process Models. Proc. ICEIS 2015, 49–59 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    OMG: MOF 2.0 Query/View/Transformation Specification, v1.0. OMG (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brdjanin, D., Maric, S.: Towards the automated business model-driven conceptual database design. In: Morzy, T., Harder, T., Wrembel, R. (eds.) Advances in Databases and Information Systems. AISC, vol. 186, pp. 31–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-32741-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Espana, S., Ruiz, M., Gonzalez, A.: Systematic derivation of conceptual models from requirements models: a controlled experiment. In: Proceeding of RCIS 2012, pp. 1–12. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Juristo, N., Moreno, A.: Basics of sOftware Engineering Experimentation. Springer, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Harmain, H., Gaizauskas, R.: CM-builder: a natural language-based CASE Tool for object-oriented analysis. Autom. Softw. Eng. 10(2), 157–181 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Omar, N., Hanna, P., McKevitt, P.: Heuristics-based entity-relationship modelling through natural language processing. Proc. AICS 2004, 302–313 (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brdjanin, D., Maric, S.: An approach to automated conceptual database design based on the UML activity diagram. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 9(1), 249–283 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    OMG: BPMN 2.0 by Example, v. 1.0. OMG (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Banjac, G.: Automated synthesis of conceptual database model based on collaborative business process model. Master thesis, University of Banja Luka (2014)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Conway, M.: How do committees invent? Datamation (1968)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Drazen Brdjanin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Goran Banjac
    • 1
  • Danijela Banjac
    • 1
  • Slavko Maric
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Banja LukaBanja LukaBosnia and Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations