Skip to main content

Usability Evaluation of the Mobile Application of Centralized Hospital Appointment System (CHAS)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
User Centric E-Government

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the usability of the mobile application of Centralized Hospital Appointment System (CHAS) developed by the Ministry of Health in 2012, as part of e-government efforts in Turkey. A study group was formed consisting of 16 people, 8 females and 8 males between the ages of 18 and 55, and selected for their CHAS experience. Qualitative and quantitative methods were used as part of a mixed research design. Qualitative data sources for the study consisted of observation notes taken while performing authentic tasks that were selected through field research, notes generated by the think-aloud method and meeting notes taken after the process. Quantitative data were collected with a performance evaluation form and questionnaire. Researchers analyzed the data using SPSS 21 program for the quantitative data, and using Microsoft Word and Excel for the qualitative data derived from the participant group. Descriptive analysis, nonparametric chi-square test (single sample with two variables) and Kruskal-Wallis H Tests were used for the quantitative analysis of the data. Moreover, a content analysis method was used for the qualitative analysis of the data. Results of the data analysis indicated that participants of both male and younger groups performed better than others, which was significantly distinctive and matched other literature related to the usability of technology in the many tasks performed by the application. In addition, participants who had experience of using touch-screen devices and were of higher educational status were found to be statistically significantly more successful than other participants. Findings derived from the study indicate that the general specifications and interface of the CHAS mobile application are beneficial and necessary for accessing the medical services. Conclusions also suggest that the application would be easier and more effective to use after the suggested revisions have been made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bouguettaya A, Rezgui A, Medjahed B, Ouzzani M (2004) Internet computing support for digital government. In: Singh MP (ed) Practical handbook of internet computing. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cao J, Chc Z (2007) Applications of lCT Services for E-Government. In: Xu L, Tjoa A, Chaudhry S (eds) IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol 254: Research and practical issues of enterprise information systems II Volume I. Springer, Roston, pp 689–694

    Google Scholar 

  3. Namlı Ç (2010) Mobil Uygulama Kullanılabilirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi. Master dissertation. İstanbul University

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taner N (2013) Kullanıcılarının akıllı telefonları değerlendirmeleri: Kastamonu şehir merkezinde bir uygulama. Uluslararası İşletme ve Yönetim Dergisi 1(2):127–140

    Google Scholar 

  5. INNOVA (2014) http://www.innova.com.tr/en/centralized-hospital-appointment-system.asp

  6. Coursaris CK, Kim D (2006) A qualitative review of empirical mobile usability studies. In: AMCIS, p 352

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mazman SG, Tüzün H, Akbal S, Yeniad M (2010) Bölüm web sitelerinin kullanılabilirlik testi: otantik kullanıcılarla ve otantik görevlerle bir durum çalışması. In: Proceedings of the international conference of education, research and innovation (ICERI 2010), Madrid, 15–17 Nov 2010

    Google Scholar 

  8. Patrick K, Griswold WG, Raab F, Intille SS (2008) Health and the mobile phone. Am J Prev Med 35(2):177–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tarcan M, Hikmet N, Tarcan GY, Top M, Sapaz B (2013) An investigation on implementation of Central Hospital Appointment System (Chas) in Turkey. In: Proceedings for the Northeast Region Decision Sciences Institute, p 1016

    Google Scholar 

  10. William B, Po-Yin Y, Marlene R, Rebecca S, Brown W (2013) Assessment of the Health IT Usability Evaluation Model (Health-ITUEM) for evaluating Mobile Health (mHealth) technology. J Biomed Inform 46:1080–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gökay G, Erçil Y, Tokdemir G, Çağıltay N, Aykaç YE (2015) Kişisel Sağlık Kaydı Sistemleri Kullanılabilirlik Durum Çalışması. Tıp Teknolojileri Ulusal Kongresi. Vogue 15(18)

    Google Scholar 

  12. The Ministry of Health in Turkey. CHAS website https://www.mhrs.gov.tr/Vatandas/. Accessed 2014

  13. Boulos MNK, Brewer AC, Karimkhani C, Buller DB, Dellavalle RP (2014) Mobile medical and health apps: state of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification. J Public Health Inform 5(3):e229. doi:10.5210/ojphi.v5i3.4814

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shackel B (2009) Usability-context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Interact Comput 21(5–6):339–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carayon P, Cartmill R, Blosky MA, Brown R, Hackenberg M, Hoonakker P, Walker JM (2011) ICU nurses’ acceptance of electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 18(6):812–819. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaikkonen A, Kallio T, Kekakainen A, Kankainen A, Cankar M (2005) Usability testing of mobile applications: a comparison between laboratory and field testing. J Usability Stud 1(1):4–16

    Google Scholar 

  17. Davies DJ (2007) Improving the usability of mobile applications through context-awareness. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang D, Adipat B (2005) Challenges, methodologies, and issues in the usability testing of mobile applications. Int J Hum Comput Interact 18(3):293–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamminen S, Oulasvirta A, Toiskallio K, Kankainen A (2004) Understanding mobile contexts. J Pers Ubiquitous Comput 8:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Beck ET, Christiansen MK, Kjeldskov J, Kolbe N, Stage J (2003) Experimental evaluation of techniques for usability testing of mobile systems in a laboratory setting. In: Proceedings of Ozchi, pp 106–115

    Google Scholar 

  21. Boudreaux ED, Waring ME, Hayes RB, Sadasivam RS, Mullen S, Pagoto S (2014) Evaluating and selecting mobile health apps: strategies for healthcare providers and healthcare organizations. Behav Med Pract Policy Res 4:363. doi:10.1007/s13142-014-0293-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M (2015) Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR mHealth uHealth 3(1):e27. doi:10.2196/mhealth.3422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Karahoca A, Karahoca D, Pınar İ, Yalçın Ş (2008) Mobil Acil Servis Yazılımı İçin Tablet PC Kullanılabilirlik Analizi. 2. Ulusal Sistem Mühendisliği Kongresi, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vélez O (2011) Design and usability testing of an mHealth application for midwives in rural Ghana. Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hashim AS, Ahmad WFW, Ahmad R (2011) Usability study of mobile learning course content application as a revision tool. In: Visual informatics: sustaining research and innovations. Springer, Berlin, pp 23–32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Kenteris M, Gavalas D, Economou D (2009) An innovative mobile electronic tourist guide application. Personal Ubiquitous Comput 13(2):103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Büyüköztürk Ş (2004) Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, Araştırma Deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. (Press 11). Pegem Publications, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yıldırım A, Şimşek H (1999) Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. (Press 9). Seçkin Publications, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sonderegger A, Sauer J (2010) The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: effects on user performance and perceived usability. Appl Ergon 41(3):403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Venkatesh V, Morris MG (2000) Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Q 24:115–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chadwick-Dias A, McNulty M, Tullis T (2003) Web usability and age: how design changes can improve performance. ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped, vol 73–74, pp 30–37

    Google Scholar 

  32. Morris MG, Venkatesh V (2000) Age differences in technology adoption decisions: implications for a changing work force. Pers Psychol 53(2):375–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hakan Tüzün .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taşkın, B., Coşkun, H.İ., Tüzün, H. (2018). Usability Evaluation of the Mobile Application of Centralized Hospital Appointment System (CHAS). In: Saeed, S., Ramayah, T., Mahmood, Z. (eds) User Centric E-Government. Integrated Series in Information Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59442-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics