Skip to main content

Parenting in Isolation, Without or With a Partner

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1054 Accesses

Part of the book series: Focused Issues in Family Therapy ((FIFT))

Abstract

This chapter describes the therapeutic challenges of addressing problems in parenting with overburdened single parents, with high-conflict separated or divorced couples, and with two-parent families where one parent is uninvolved with the children or is actively obstructive to the therapeutic process. The focus of the chapter is the use of specific alliance strategies to empower families when one parent is literally or psychologically absent, as well as when both parents are actively involved in treatment but are in sharp disagreement about their child’s behavior (e.g., use of alcohol/drugs, eating problems, “coming out” as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender). We recommend specific ways to engage the absentee parent and discuss how to approach the case when this strategy fails. We also describe ways to use the therapeutic alliance to empower single parents to address their children’s internalizing and externalizing difficulties. Often the lack of coordination in parenting arises when the child or adolescent is in crisis. An extended example shows, through annotated dialogue, how a therapist approached working with a Chinese mother who had the sole burden of parenting a 13-year-old boy with Down’s syndrome who had recently made a sexual advance to another boy. When the father eventually agreed to attend a session, the therapist used various strategies to ensure safety and enhance the within-couple alliance around shared parenting responsibilities, all the while being careful not to shame the father about his lack of involvement or create a split alliance that would have harmed the fragile couple relationship.

There are no problems, only opportunities for growth.

—Jewish Proverb

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Client introduces a problem for discussion and leans forward.

  2. 2.

    Client varies his/her emotional tone during the session.

  3. 3.

    Therapist expresses empathy for the client’s struggle and remarks on how her values or experiences are similar to the client’s.

  4. 4.

    Client indicates agreement with the therapist’s goals.

  5. 5.

    Therapist provides structure and guidelines for safety and confidentiality; therapist acknowledges that therapy involves taking risks or discussing private matters.

  6. 6.

    Client agrees to do homework assignments.

  7. 7.

    Client indicates having done homework or seeing it as useful.

  8. 8.

    Client directly asks another family member for feedback about his/her behavior.

  9. 9.

    Client expresses anxiety nonverbally.

  10. 10.

    Family members avoid eye contact with each other.

  11. 11.

    Therapist reassures or normalizes a client’s emotional vulnerability.

  12. 12.

    Therapist helps clients to talk truthfully and not defensively with each other.

  13. 13.

    Therapist praises client motivation for engagement or change.

  14. 14.

    Therapist encourages clients to show caring, concern, and support for each other.

  15. 15.

    Client complies with the therapist’s request for an enactment.

  16. 16.

    Therapist draws attention to clients’ shared feelings.

  17. 17.

    Client describes a plan for improving the situation.

  18. 18.

    Client agrees to do homework assignment.

  19. 19.

    Therapist expresses empathy for the client’s struggle.

  20. 20.

    Client indicates having done the homework or seeing it as useful.

  21. 21.

    Therapist notes that a positive change has taken place.

  22. 22.

    Therapist actively protests one-family member from another (e.g., blame).

  23. 23.

    Therapist encourages clients to ask each other for their perspective.

  24. 24.

    Client complies with therapist’s request for an enactment.

  25. 25.

    Therapist notes that a positive change has taken place.

  26. 26.

    Therapist draws attention to clients’ shared values, experiences, needs, or feelings.

  27. 27.

    Therapist expresses optimism.

  28. 28.

    Family members share a lighthearted moment with each other.

References

  • Beach, S. R. H. (2016). Expanding the study of dyadic conflict: The potential role of self-evaluation maintenance processes. In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter, M. L. Clements, & T. Boone-Holliday (Eds.), Couples in conflict (pp. 83–94). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, A. C. (2007). Re-visioning, restructuring, and reconciliation: Clinical practice with complex postdivorce families. Family Process, 46, 67–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blow, A. J., Morrison, N. C., Tamaren, K., Wright, K., Schaafsma, M., & Nadaud, A. (2009). Change processes in couple therapy: An intensive case analysis of one couple using a common factors lens. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35, 350–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blow, K., & Daniel, G. (2002). Frozen narratives? Post-divorce processes and contact disputes. Journal of Family Therapy, 24, 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, M. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, C., & Pasley, K. (2000). Family boundary ambiguity, marital status, and child adjustment. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 20, 281–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulehan, R., Friedlander, M. L., & Heatherington, L. (1998). Transforming narratives: A change event in constructivist family therapy. Family Process, 37, 17–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, E. M., Goeke-Morey, M. C., & Papp, L. M. (2016). Couple conflict, children, and families: It’s not just you and me, babe. In I. A. Booth, A. C. Crouter, M. L. Clements, & T. Boone-Holliday (Eds.), Couples in conflict (pp. 117–147). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, G. S., Diamond, G. M., & Levy, S. A. (2014). Attachment Based Family Therapy for depressed adolescents. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, L., & Cushway, D. (2002). The parentified child. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 7, 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, M. G., Hokoda, A., & Ramos-Lira, L. (2007). Differences in effects of domestic violence between Latina and non-Latina women. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escudero, V., Boogmans, E., Loots, G., & Friedlander, M.L. (2012). Alliance rupture and repair in conjoint family therapy: An exploratory study. Psychotherapy, 49, 26–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, M. L., Escudero, V., & Heatherington, L. (2006). Therapeutic alliances with couples and families: An empirically-informed guide to practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, M. L., Escudero, V., Heatherington, L., & Diamond, G. M. (2011). Alliance in couple and family therapy. Psychotherapy, 48, 25–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, M. L., Heatherington, L., Johnson, B., & Skowron, E. A. (1994). “Sustaining engagement”: A change event in family therapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 438–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, M. L., Kivlighan, D. M., & Shaffer, K. (2012). Exploring actor-partner interdependence in family therapy: Whose view (parent or adolescent) best predicts treatment progress? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 168–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, M. L., Lambert, J. E., Escudero, V., & Cragun, C. (2008). How do therapists enhance family alliances? Sequential analyses of therapist → client behavior in two contrasting cases. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 45, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, M. L., Lee, H. H., Shaffer, K. S., & Cabrera, P. (2014). Negotiating therapeutic alliances with a family at impasse: An evidence-based case study. Psychotherapy, 51, 41–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B. S., Atkinson, D. R., & Umemoto, D. (2001). Asian cultural values and the counseling process: Current knowledge and directions for future research. The Counseling Psychologist, 29, 570–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, J. E., Skinner, A., & Friedlander, M. L. (2012). Problematic within-family alliances in conjoint family therapy: A close look at five cases. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38, 417–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, H. (2010). Multidimensional Family Therapy: A science-based treatment system. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHale, J. P. (2004). Overt and covert parenting processes in the family. Family Process, 36, 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S., & Fishman, C. (1981). Techniques of family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñiz de la Peña, C., Friedlander, M. L., & Escudero, V. (2009). Frequency, severity, and evolution of split family alliances: How observable are they? Psychotherapy Research, 19, 133–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, P. (2013). The Maudsley model of family therapy for children and adolescents with anorexia nervosa: Theory, clinical practice, and empirical support. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 24, 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, M. S., Liddle, H. A., Turner, C. W., Dakof, G. A., Alexander, J. F., & Kogan, S. M. (2006). Adolescent and parent therapeutic alliances as predictors of dropout in Multidimensional Family Therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 108–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rober, P. (2012). The single-parent family and the family therapist: About invitations and positioning. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, T. L. (2011). Functional Family Therapy: An evidence-based treatment model for working with troubled adolescents. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szapocznik, J., & Williams, R. A. (2000). Brief Strategic Family Therapy: Twenty-five years of interplay among theory, research and practice in adolescent behavior problems and drug abuse. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3, 117–134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Escudero, V., Friedlander, M.L. (2017). Parenting in Isolation, Without or With a Partner. In: Therapeutic Alliances with Families. Focused Issues in Family Therapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59369-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics