Advertisement

A Review on Recent Development of the Involvement Load Hypothesis

  • Haoran Xie
  • Di ZouEmail author
  • Fu Lee Wang
  • Tak-Lam Wong
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10309)

Abstract

The Involvement Load Hypothesis, proposed by Laufer and Hulstijn in 2001, has been widely adopted and applied to estimate effectiveness of word-focused tasks in promoting word learning. With the development and shift of learning contexts, models and technologies in the past sixteen years, the involvement load hypothesis has been researched from various aspects. This review investigates the applications and theoretical developments of the hypothesis, focusing on two main areas: examination of the three components of the hypothesis, and comparison or integration of the hypothesis with other hypothesis or theories, for example, the technique feature analysis. Future developments in related fields are also discussed.

Keywords

Involvement Load Hypothesis Vocabulary learning Incidental learning Second language acquisition 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The work described in this paper was fully supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (UGC/FDS11/E06/14). This article is based on part of Haoran Xie’s course essay (EDUCD0011 Understanding Educational Research) for the fulfillment of the Doctor of Education programme, which was submitted to University of Bristol in 2017.

References

  1. Ansarin, A.A., Bayazidi, A.: Task type and incidental L2 vocabulary learning: repetition versus task involvement load. South. Afr. Linguist. Appl. Lang. Stud. 34(2), 135–146 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, H.J.H., Yang, T.Y.C.: The impact of adventure video games on foreign language learning and the perceptions of learners. Interact. Learn. Environ. 21(2), 129–141 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K.: Research Methods in Education. Routledge, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  4. Eckerth, J., Tavakoli, P.: The effects of word exposure frequency and elaboration of word processing on incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through reading. Lang. Teach. Res. 16, 227–252 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fatalaki, J.A.: Involvement load hypothesis: word meaning retention across oral and written task types. Int. Lett. Soc. Humanistic Sci. 37, 29–45 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldin, G.A.: A scientific perspective on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research (2000)Google Scholar
  7. Haratmeh, M.S.: Involvement load and task type in task effectiveness: two aspects of vocabulary knowledge. Int. J. Acad. Res. 4(4), 86–95 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heshusius, L., Ballard, K. (eds.): From Positivism to Interpretivism and Beyond: Tales of Transformation in Educational and Social Research (the Mind-Body Connection). Teachers College Press (1996)Google Scholar
  9. Huang, L.L., Lin, C.C.: Three approaches to glossing and their effects on vocabulary learning. System 44, 127–136 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hulstijn, H., Laufer, B.: Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Lang. Learn. 51, 539–558 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu, H.C.M., Nassaji, H.: Effective vocabulary learning tasks: involvement load hypothesis versus technique feature analysis. System 56, 28–39 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khoii, R., Sharififar, S.: Memorization versus semantic mapping in L2 vocabulary acquisition. ELT J. 67(2), 199–209 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kincheloe, J.L., McLaren, P.: Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In: Ethnography and Schools: Qualitative Approaches to the Study of Education, pp. 87–138 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. Kim, Y.: The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Lang. Learn. 61(s1), 100–140 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krashen, S.: We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Mod. Lang. J. 73(4), 440–464 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, S., Pulido, D.: The impact of topic interest, L2 proficiency, and gender on EFL incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Lang. Teach. Res. 21(1), 118–135 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu, M.: Effects of four vocabulary exercises on facilitating learning vocabulary meaning, form, and use. TESOL Q. 47, 167–176 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nation, I.S., Webb, S.A.: Researching and Analyzing Vocabulary. Cengage Learning, Heinle (2011)Google Scholar
  19. Swain, M.: The output hypothesis: just speaking and writing aren’t enough. Can. Mod. Lang. Rev. 50(1), 158–164 (1993)Google Scholar
  20. Young, R.E.: A critical theory of education: Habermas and our children’s future (1990)Google Scholar
  21. Zou, D.: Vocabulary acquisition through cloze exercises, sentence-writing and composition-writing: Extending the evaluation component of the involvement load hypothesis. Lang. Teach. Res. 21(1), 54–75 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zou, D.: Comparing dictionary-induced vocabulary learning and inferencing in the context of reading. Lexikos 26(1), 372–390 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haoran Xie
    • 1
  • Di Zou
    • 2
    Email author
  • Fu Lee Wang
    • 3
  • Tak-Lam Wong
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Information TechnologyThe Education University of Hong KongTai PoHong Kong
  2. 2.Department of English Language EducationThe Education University of Hong KongTai PoHong Kong
  3. 3.Caritas Institute of Higher EducationTseung Kwan OHong Kong

Personalised recommendations