Advertisement

Improving Video Engagement by Gamification: A Proposed Design of MOOC Videos

  • Yun Zhu
  • Leisi PeiEmail author
  • Junjie ShangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10309)

Abstract

MOOCs have rapidly been a predominant form of distance learning recently. Through high-speed internet, students in MOOCs can not only enjoy best learning resources around the world, but also connect closely with others. However, it is worrying that completion rate of MOOCs is only 10% on average, which reflects the low engagement of learning in MOOCs. Confronted with such problem, this paper proposed a gamification design of MOOC videos by adding implicit feedback into mechanics and updating existing delivery media from lecture-style to narrative-style.

Keywords

Video engagement Gamification MOOC MDA Flow theory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been fully supported by MOE Research Center for Online Education Foundation (Project NO. 2016ZD101). We should also give thanks to Ximei Qu, Minmin Zhong, Yang Zhang, Xiao Ma, Ruonan Hu, YangChunxiao Wang, Xiaowei Zhao and Weijia Jin for video recording and editing in the MOOC, “How to Teach by Gamification”.

References

  1. 1.
    Daniel, J.: Making sense of MOOCs: musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and possibility. Open Educ. Res. 2012, 18 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pappano, L.: The Year of the MOOC. The New York Times (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu, M., Kang, J., Cao, M., Lim, M., Ko, Y., Myers, R., Weiss, A.S.: Understanding MOOCs as an emerging online learning tool: perspectives from the students. Am. J. Distance Educ. 28, 147 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Adams, A.A., Williams, S.A.: MOOCs: a systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 14, 202 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jordan, K.: Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 15, 133 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coffrin, C., Corrin, L., Barba, P.D., Kennedy, G.: Visualizing patterns of student engagement and performance in MOOCs. In: International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, vol. 83 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Breslow, L.: Studying learning in the worldwide classroom research into edX’s first MOOC. Res. Pract. Assess. 8, 13 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guo, P.J., Kim, J., Rubin, R.: How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. In: ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, vol. 43, p. 41 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goel, A., Chauhan, J.: An analysis of video lecture in MOOC. In: International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications: Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer, ICTERI 2015, vol. 1356 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giannakos, M.N., Jaccheri, L., Krogstie, J.: How video usage styles affect student engagement? Implications for video-based learning environments. In: The International Conference on Smart Learning Environments (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hew, K.F.: Promoting engagement in online courses: what strategies can we learn from three highly rated MOOCS. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 47, 320 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freitas, S.I.D., Morgan, J., Gibson, D.: Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 46, 455 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hone, K.S., El Said, G.R.: Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: a survey study. Comput. Educ. 98, 157 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hew, K.F., Cheung, W.S.: Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): motivations and challenges. Educ. Res. Rev. 12, 45 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Helme, S., Clarke, D.: Cognitive Engagement in the Mathematics Classroom. Springer, Netherlands (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christenson, S.L., Reschly, A.L., Wylie, C.: Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer, US (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Landers, R.N., Rachel, K.N.B., Armstrong, M.B.: Psychological Theory and the Gamification of Learning. Gamification in Education and Business, 165 p. Springer International Publishing (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 54 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hew, K.F.: Towards a model of engaging online students: lessons from MOOCs and four policy documents. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 5, 425 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sailer, M., Hense, J.U., Mayr, S.K., Mandl, H.: How gamification motivates: an experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 69, 371 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Deterding, S., Khaled, R., Nacke, L., Dan, D.: Gamification: toward a definition. In: CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings, vol. 12 (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dyer, R.: A Conceptual Framework for Gamification Measurement. Gamification in Education and Business, 47 p. Springer International Publishing (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Curtis, V.: Motivation to participate in an online citizen science game: a study of Foldit. Sci. Commun. 37, 723 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Malone, T.W.: Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cogn. Sci. 5, 333 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Malone, T.W.: What makes things fun to learn? Heuristics for designing instructional computer games. In: ACM SIGSMALL Symposium and the First SIGPC Symposium on Small Systems, vol. 162 (1980)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. Springer, Netherlands (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hunicke, R., Leblanc, M., Zubek, R.: MDA: a formal approach to game design and game research. In: Challenges in Games AI Workshop, vol. 1 (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dreyfus, H.L.: The ethical implications of the five-stage skill-acquisition model. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 24, 251 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Abbott, H.P.: The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fludernik, M.: An Introduction to Narratology. Routledge, London (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Creative StudiesShanghai Theater AcademyShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Beijing Academy of Educational SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Graduate School of EducationPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations