Investigation of the ICT Situation in Chinese Primary School: The Role of School Characteristics

  • Congcong Li
  • Wenting Zhou
  • Chun Lu
  • Di WuEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10309)


The development of ICT in schools was influenced by many external environment factors and internal ICT factors. To identify the school-level factors linked with schools ICT situation, and the differences of the ICT implementation stages of rural and urban schools, a survey of 4,357 was conducted. Four subscales including environment, support, application, and fund allocation were extracted from the Features of School ICT Situation (FSIS). Through stepwise regression analysis, it is revealed that the ICT literacy of teacher is the most important predictor for schools’ FSIS. In addition, there are more Essential Elements of School Characteristics (EESC) items that can make significant prediction of FSIS for rural schools than for urban schools, and their predictive power for FSIS of rural schools is stronger than that of urban schools. The result reflects that EESC items which evaluate background and basic situation of ICT development in schools have stronger positive predictive power for schools in rural areas and the number of predictive indicators is larger. EESC items have relatively weaker predictive power and fewer predictive indicators for urban schools.


Development of ICT in education Essential elements of school construction Teachers’ ICT competence Rural-urban divide 



This research was supported by National Science & Technology Pillar Program during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period under grant (No.2014BAH22F01).


  1. 1.
    Valcke, M.: Understanding structural and cultural school characteristics in relation to educational change: the case of ICT integration. Educ. Stud. 35(2), 223–235 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tondeur, J., Valcke, M., Braak, J.V.: A Multidimensional approach to determinants of computer use in primary education: teacher and school characteristics. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 24(6), 494–506 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Law, N., Chow, A.: Teacher characteristics, contextual factors, and how these affect the pedagogical use of ICT. In: Law, N., Pelgrum W.J., Plomp, T. (eds.) Pedagogy and ICT Use: In Schools Around the World Findings from the IEA Sites 2006 Study, pp. 181–219. Springer, Netherlands (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prestridge, S.: The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Comput. Educ. 58(1), 449–458 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aoki, H., Kim, J., Lee, W.: Propagation & level: factors influencing in the ICT composite index at the school level. Comput. Educ. 60(1), 310–324 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chuang, H.-H., Weng, C.-Y., Huang, F.-C.: A structure equation model among factors of teachers’ technology integration practice and their TPCK. Comput. Educ. 86, 182–191 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wastiau, P., Blamire, R., Kearney, C., Quittre, V., Van de Gaer, E., Monseur, C.: The Use of ICT in education: a survey of schools in Europe. Eur. J. Educ. 48(1), 11–27 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mai, N., Tse-Kian, N.: Engaging students in multimedia-mediated constructivist learning - students’ perceptions. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12(2), 254–266 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cano, M.-D., Sanchez-Iborra, R.: On the use of a multimedia platform for music education with handicapped children: a case study. Comput. Educ. 87, 254–276 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lysenko, L.V., Abrami, P.C.: Promoting reading comprehension with the use of technology. Comput. Educ. 75, 162–172 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kong, S.C.: An empirical study of school-based planning for the use of information technology to improve the quality of education in the twenty-first century. Technol. Pedagogy Educ. 36(3), 343–359 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, Q., Ma, X.: A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 22(3), 215–243 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vanderlinde, R., Van Braak, J., Tondeur, J.: Using an online tool to support school-based ICT policy planning in primary education. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 26(5), 434–447 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nielsen, W., Miller, K.A., Hoban, G.: Science teachers’ response to the digital education revolution. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 24(4), 417–431 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bateman, D., Oakley, C.: The Classmate PC 1:1 ELearning Project in Australia. Deakin University Faculty of Arts and Education (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mooij, T., Smeets, E.: Modelling and supporting ICT implementation in secondary schools. Comput. Educ. 36(3), 265–281 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim, J.H., Jung, S.Y., Lee, W.G.: Design of contents for ICT literacy in-service training of teachers in Korea. Comput. Educ. 51(4), 1683–1706 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Valcke, M.: The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Comput. Educ. 51(4), 1499–1509 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leask, M., Pachler, N.: Learning to Teach Using ICT in the Secondary School. Routledge, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    MEXT: Section 8 Technology and Home Economics New Course of Study for Junior High School. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., Tuson, J.: Teachers and ICT: current use and future needs. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 31(4), 307–320 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haydn, T.A., Barton, R.: Common needs and different agendas: how trainee teachers make progress in their ability to use ICT in subject teaching. some lessons from the UK. Comput. Educ. 49(4), 1018–1036 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tearle, P.: ICT implementation: what makes the difference? Br. J. Edu. Technol. 34(5), 567–583 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dong, Y., Chai, C.-S., Sang, G.-Y., Koh, J.H.L., Tsai, C.-C.: Exploring the profiles and interplays of pre-service and in-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in China. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 18(1), 158–169 (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rodríguez, P., Nussbaum, M., López, X., Sepúlveda, M.: A monitoring and evaluation scheme for an ICT-supported education program in schools. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 13(2), 166–179 (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cox, M.J., Marshall, G.: Effects of ICT: do we know what we should know? Educ. Inf. Technol. 12(2), 59–70 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pi-Sui, H., Priya, S.: A systemic plan of technology integration. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 9(4), 173–184 (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bandung, Y., Gani, A.M., Tanuwidjaja, H.C., Sembiring, J.: The challenges of delivering multimedia-based learning services in rural areas. In: International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation, pp. 1–6. IEEE, Indonesia (2015)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lv, J.: ICT education in rural areas of southwest china: a case study of Zhongxian County, Chongqing. In: International Conference on Computer Science & Education, pp. 681–685. IEEE, Singapore (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Looker, E.D., Thiessen, V.: Beyond the digital divide in canadian schools: from access to competency in the use of information technology. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 21(4), 475–490 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Engineering Research Center for E-LearningCentral China Normal UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Collaborative & Innovative Center for Educational TechnologyCentral China Normal UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations