Empirical Study on Google Earth (GE)-Integrated Science Lessons: Cases from Two Chinese Elementary Schools

  • Xiuli Cheng
  • Yuqing GuoEmail author
  • Yan Li
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10309)


The goal of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of applying Google Earth (GE) in an elementary science lesson by comparing the academic results between GE-integrated instruction and traditional instruction. The teaching practice was implemented in two Chinese elementary schools located in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province. The GE-integrated and traditional inquiry activities were both designed based on 5E learning cycle and qualitative and quantitative methods were used to test the effectiveness of GE-integrated instruction. Data analysis found that: (1) students shown great interests in GE-integrated science lesson; (2) teachers held positive attitude toward the application of GE in science teaching; (3) there were no significant differences in academic results between traditional instruction and GE-integrated instruction. Suggestions and proposals were put forward at the end of the study.


5E learning cycle Elementary science Google Earth (GE) Integrating 



This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DCL001), and grant from the Instructional Reform funding from Department of Education of Zhejiang Province (KG2015001) and Department of Education Online Learning funding (2016YB143).


  1. 1.
    Britt, J., LaFontain, G.: Google Earth: a virtual globe for elementary geography. Soc. Stud. Young Learner 21, 20–23 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ratinen, I., Keinonen, T.: Student-teachers’ use of Google Earth in problem-based geology learning. Int. Res. Geogr. Environ. Educ. 20, 345–358 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kulo, V.A., Bodzin, A.M.: Integrating geospatial technologies in an energy unit. J. Geogr. 110, 239–251 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bodzin, A.M., Cirucci, L.: Integrating geospatial technologies to examine Urban land use change: a design partnership. J. Geogr. 108, 186–197 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Almquist, H., Blank, L., Estrada, J.: Developing a scope and sequence for using Google Earth in the middle school earth science classroom. Geol. Soc. Am. 492, 403–412 (2012). Special PapersGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The BSCS 5E Instructional Model and 21st Century Skills: A commissioned paper prepared for a workshop on exploring the intersection of science education and the development of 21st century skills.
  7. 7.
    The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness.
  8. 8.
    Piyayodilokchai, H., Panjaburee, P., Laosinchaim, P., Ketpichainarong, W., Ruenwongsa, P.: A 5E learning cycle approach–based, multimedia-supplemented instructional unit for structured query language. Educ. Technol. Soc. 16, 146–159 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sadi, Ö., Çakiroğlu, J.: Effects of 5E learning cycle on students’ human circulatory system achievement. J. Appl. Biol. Sci. 4, 63–67 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu, T.C., Peng, H., Wu, W.H., Lin, M.S.: The effects of mobile natural-science learning based on the 5E learning cycle: a case study. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12, 344–358 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boddy, N., Watson, K., Aubusson, P.: A trial of the five Es: a referent model for constructivist teaching and learning. Res. Sci. Educ. 33, 27–42 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R.: How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press, Washington, D. C. (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Center for Educational TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Zhejiang UniversityHang ZhouChina

Personalised recommendations