Abstract
Urban brownfields have been an international phenomenon for decades and are part of most industrialised countries worldwide (de Sousa 2008). Brownfields are understood as previously used land that has been abandoned and may suffer from contamination. They occur in shrinking cities as well as in growing cities. In particular, urban locations that changed from agglomerations with heavy industry to service centres transformed these urban spaces into brownfields. Several international institutions and expert networks deal with concerted actions for brownfields, to develop such valuable urban areas (CABERNET; US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), European Environmental Agency (EEA), etc.). Despite substantial efforts, many of these previously used industrial sites could not be assigned to new functions and, therefore, no further use was made available. Re-using brownfields can help to reduce the amount of newly sealed land (e.g., Rink and Banzhaf 2011). Land recycling, in particular, is considered a solution because it offers potential sites for residential and commercial constructions (EEA 2015). For the process of reurbanisation, brownfields play a particularly important role in recycling former industrial sites into land that meets the needs of today’s cities. In urban areas, land is subjected to strong dynamics and is a tenuous and competing resource, in view of ongoing global urbanisation. Therefore, the development of commercial brownfields is an important municipal task for sustainable land management. Their potential redevelopment is vital with regard to resource-efficient land management, on the one hand, and the newly developed land-use type as an option for increased urban resilience against natural hazards on the other. Consequently, redevelopment can have marked effects on the quality of life and sustainable urban development (Martinat et al. 2016; Norrman et al. 2016; Bartke et al. 2016).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Ahern J (2007) Green infrastructure for cities: the spatial dimension. In: Novotny V, Brown P (eds) Cities of the future towards integrated sustainable water and landscape management. IWA Publishing, London, pp 267–283
Arndt T, Werner P (2015) Naturschutz und Landschaftspflege in der integrierten Stadtentwicklung. Argumente, Positionen, Hintergründe. Bundesamt für Naturschutz (BfN). https://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/BfN/siedlung/Dokumente/NuL_in_der_integrierten_Stadtentwicklung_11_2015.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2016
Bartke S, Martinát S, Klusácek P, Pizzol L, Alexandrescu F, Frantál B et al (2016) Targeted selection of brownfields from portfolios for sustainable regeneration: user experiences from fice cases testing the Timbre Brownfield prioritization tool. J Environ Manag 184:94–107. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.037
BBSR – Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung (ed) (2013) Innenentwicklungspotenziale in Deutschland – Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Umfrage und Möglichkeiten einer automatisierten Abschätzung. BBSR, Bonn
BMU – Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (2007) Nationale Strategie zur biologischen Vielfalt. BMU, Berlin
Budinger A, Gruehn D (2012) Bedeutung von Freiräumen und Grünflächen für den Wert von Grundstücken und Immobilien in der Stadt Bonn. LLP, Dortmund
Burkhardt I, Dietrich R, Hoffmann H, Leschner J, Lohmann K, Schoder F, Schulz A (2008) Urbane Wälder, Abschlussbericht zur Voruntersuchung für das Erprobungs- und Entwicklungsvorhaben “Ökologische Stadterneuerung durch Anlage urbaner Waldflächen auf innerstädtischen Flächen im Nutzungswandel – ein Beitrag zur Stadtentwicklung”. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn-Bad Godesberg
Corebro Project (2016) Monitoring of commercial and residential brownfields in the City of Leipzig (corebro). Potentials to renaturalise and to revitalize urban brownfields. http://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=40466. Accessed 11 Aug 2016
De Sousa CA (2008) Brownfields redevelopment and the quest for sustainability. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Die Bundesregierung (2002) Perspektiven für Deutschland. Unsere Strategie für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung. Berlin, Bundesregierung
EC – European Commission (2013) Grüne Infrastruktur (GI): Aufwertung des europäischen Naturkapitals. KOM, Brussels, p 249
EEA – European Environmental Agency (2011) Green infrastructure and territorial cohesion. The concept of green infrastructure and its integration into policies using monitoring systems. Technical report, No. 18/2011. EEA, Copenhagen
EEA – European Environmental Agency (2015) Urban sustainability issues – What is a resource-efficient city?. Technical report, No. 23/2015. EEA, Copenhagen
Ferber U, Grimski D, Glöckner S, Dosch F (2010) Stadtbrachenpotenziale: Von Leuchttürmen und Patchwork. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 1:1–11
Hansen R, Heidebach M, Kuchler F, Pauleit S (2012) Brachflächen im Spannungsfeld zwischen Naturschutz und (baulicher) Wiedernutzung. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn-Bad Godesberg
Keil A (2005) Use and perception of post-industrial urban landscapes in the Ruhr. In: Kowarik I, Körner S (eds) Wild urban woodlands: new perspectives for urban forestry. Springer, Berlin, pp 117–130
Kowarik I (1993) Stadtbrachen als Niemandsland, Naturschutzgebiete oder Gartenkunstwerke der Zukunft? In: Wittig R, Zucchi H (eds) Städtische Brachflächen und ihre Bedeutung aus der Sicht von Ökologie, Umwelterziehung und Planung. Natur & Wissenschaft Hieronimus & Schmidt, Solingen, pp 3–24
Kühnau C, Böhme C, Bunzel A, Böhm J, Reinke M (2016) Von der Theorie zur Umsetzung: Stadtnatur und doppelte Innenentwicklung. Empirische Ergebnisse einer Befragung deutscher Großstädte und Handlungsempfehlungen. Natur und Landschaft 91(7):329–335
Lafortezza RC, Sanesi G, Brown RD (2008) Visual preference and ecological assessments for designed alternative brownfield rehabilitations. J Environ Manag 89(3):257–269
Lucius I, Dan R, Caratas D, Mey F, Steinert J, Torkler P (2011) Green infrastructure. Sustainable investments for the benefit of both people and nature. http://www.surf-nature.eu/uploads/media/Thematic_Booklet_Green_Infrastructure.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2016
Martinat S, Dvorak P, Frantal B, Klusacek P, Kunc J, Navratil J, Osman R, Tureckova K, Reed M (2016) Sustainable urban development in a city affected by heavy industry and mining? Case study of brownfields in Karvina, Czech Republic. J Clean Prod 118:78–87
Mathey J, Rink D (2013) Urban redevelopment and quality of open spaces. In: Loftness V, Haase D (eds) Sustainable built environments. Springer, New York, pp 719–732
Muschak C, Weiland U, Banzhaf E (2009) Brachflächen in Stadtentwicklung und kommunalen Planungen am Beispiel der Städte Leipzig und Stuttgart. In: UFZ-Bericht 02/2009. UFZ, Leipzig
Norrman J, Volchko Y, Hooimeijer F, Maring L, Kain J-H, Bardos P et al (2016) Integration of the subsurface and the surface sectors for a more holistic approach for sustainable redevelopment of urban brownfields. Sci Total Environ 563-564:879–889. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.097
Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung (2016) Deutsche Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie. Neuauflage 2016. Entwurf https://www.bundesregierung.de/Webs/Breg/DE/Themen/Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie/1-die-nationale-nachhaltigkeitsstrategie/nachhaltigkeitsstrategie/_node.html. Accessed 25 July 2016
Rink D, Arndt T (2016) Investigating perception of green structure configuration for afforestation in urban brownfield development by visual methods – a case study in Leipzig, Germany. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 15:65–74. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.010
Rink D, Banzhaf E (2011) Flächeninanspruchnahme als Umweltproblem. In: Gross M (ed) Handbuch Umweltsoziologie. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, pp 445–463
Rößler S (2010) Freiräume in schrumpfenden Städten: Chancen und Grenzen der Freiraumplanung im Stadtumbau. Rhombos-Verlag, Berlin
Stadt Leipzig (2009) Stadtentwicklungsplan Zentren 2009, Blaue Reihe – Beiträge zur Stadtentwicklung 49. City of Leipzig, Leipzig
Stadt Leipzig (2012) Leipzig – Integrierte Stadtentwicklung. 5 Jahre Leipzig-Charta/Leipzig – Integrated Urban Development. 5 Years Leipzig Charter, Blaue Reihe – Beiträge zur Stadtentwicklung 54. In German and English. City of Leipzig, Leipzig
Stadt Leipzig (2016a) Integriertes Stadtentwicklungskonzept „Leipzig 2030”. Stadt Leipzig, Bauen und Wohnen. http://www.leipzig.de/bauen-und-wohnen/stadtentwicklung/stadtentwicklungskonzept-insek/. Accessed 11 Aug 2016
Stadt Leipzig (2016b) Der Fachteil Brachen. Stadt Leipzig, Bauen und Wohnen. http://www.leipzig.de/bauen-und-wohnen/stadtentwicklung/stadtentwicklungskonzept-insek/stadtentwicklungskonzept-seko/die-fachkonzepte-des-stadtentwicklungskonzepts/fachteil-brachen/. Accessed 11 Aug 2016
Acknowledgement
We very much appreciate the intensive collaboration with the City Council of Leipzig , Department for Urban Development and Construction, City Planning Office, Division for Urban Development Planning. Under their guidance, the mapping of commercial brownfields was carried out and funded under the project “Nachhaltiges Flächenmanagement, Baustein Flächenmonitoring”. Being much obliged to Jan Richert, who refined our understanding of transdisciplinary aspects and continuously discussed various priorities between researchers and planners with us, we want to express our gratitude to him and for his engagement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Banzhaf, E., Arndt, T., Ladiges, J. (2018). Potentials of Urban Brownfields for Improving the Quality of Urban Space. In: Kabisch, S., et al. Urban Transformations. Future City, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59324-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59324-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59323-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59324-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)