Skip to main content

Stress Testing with Bayesian Nets and Related Techniques: Meeting the Engineering Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Unconventional Risk Transfer
  • 995 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter briefly reviews the case for stress-testing risk models and recognizes the pressing ‘engineering’ problems that stand between the concept of stress testing and actually doing so for a risk model, such as a portfolio that includes a supposedly optimal allocation of assets. The chapter argues that the application of the Bayesian net ‘technology’ to stress testing introduced in the last decade lends itself particularly well to the need for a practical way to stress-test risk models. The chapter presents proposed solutions to the challenges of stress testing a model with particular reference to the use of Bayesian nets.

‘[Recent] developments will serve to further highlight the danger of […] being overly committed to an historical policy portfolio whose rigid backward-looking characterization no longer corresponds to the realities of today and tomorrow.’ ‘[W]ith its conventional (or, to be more precise, reduced-form) analytical foundation now subject to some motion, it will become even more difficult to rely just on a traditional portfolio diversification as both necessary and sufficient to deliver high returns and mitigate risks. Diversification will remain necessary, but a lot more attention will be devoted to the appropriate specification of tail scenarios and tail hedges.’ 1

Mohamed A. El-Erian

Chief Economic Advisor at Allianz

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aragones, J.R., C. Blanco, and K. Dowd. 2001. Incorporating Stress Testing into Market Risk Modelling. Institutional Investor 7 (3): 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank of England. 2007. A New Approach […] to Financial Stability, April 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, J. 1999. A Coherent Approach for Stress-Testing. Journal of Risk 2 (2): 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S., and J. Glover. 2016. ECB Leaves Investors Guessing on Some Banks’ Stress Testing Results, Friday, August 5, 2016, Bloomberg. Accessed 5 August 2016. http://www.garp.org/

  • Cannata, F., and F. Quagliarello. 2011. Basel III and Beyond—A Guide to Banking Regulation After the Crisis. London: Risk Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denev, A. 2015. Probabilistic Graphical Methods. London: Risk Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., and H. Brighton. 2009. Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science 1: 107–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., and A. Edwards. 2003. Simple Tools for Understanding Risk: From Innumeracy to Insight. British Medical Journal 327 (27, Sept.): 741–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., and R. Selten. 2002. Rethinking Rationality. In Bounded Rationality—The Adaptive Toolbox, ed. G. Gigerenzer and R. Selten. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, A., S. Hall, and S. Pezzini. 2007. A New Approach to Assessing Risks to Financial Stability. Financial Stability Paper No. 2, April 2007, Bank of England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckerman, D., and J. Breese. July 1994. A New Look at Causal Independence. In Proceedings of Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 286–292. Seattle, WA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, F.V., and T.D. Nielsen. 2007. Bayesian Nets and Decision Graphs. 2nd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jurgelanaite, R., and P.J.F. Lucas. 2005. Exploiting Causal Independence in Large Bayesian Networks. Knowledge-Based Systems 18: 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Allen Lane (Penguin Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decisions Under Risk. Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., and C.C. Finger. 2000. A Stress Test to Incorporate Correlation Breakdown. Journal of Risk 2 (3, Spring): 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, S., and S. Nadarajah. 2000. Extreme Value Theory—Theory and Applications. London: Imperial College Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kupiec, P.H. 1999. Stress Testing in a Value-at-Risk Framework. Journal of Derivatives 6: 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, A. 1999. Extreme Value Theory for Risk Managers. Working Paper, Departement Mathematik, ETH Zentrum. Accessed 12 March 2017. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.70.9298&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • McNeil, A.J., R. Frey, and P. Embrechts. 2005. Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques, and Tools. Princeton, US and Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meucci, A. 2005. Risk and Asset Allocation. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Fully Flexible Views. Risk 21: 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010a. Factors on Demand. Risk 23: 84–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010b. Fully Flexible Bayesian Network, December 6, 2010. Accessed 26 September 2011. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1721302

  • Pearl, J. 2009. Causality. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rebonato, R. 2005. The Plight of the Fortune Tellers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Coherent Stress Testing. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebonato, R., and A. Denev. 2010. A Bayesian Approach to Stress Testing and Scenario Analysis. Journal of Investment Management 8 (3): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Coherent Asset Allocation and Diversification in the Presence of Stress Events. Journal of Investment Management 10 (4): 19–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Portfolio Management Under Stress. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saroka, I., and R. Rebonato. 2015. How to Deform a Yield Curve: The Most Likely Deformation of a Yield Curve Consistent with Subjective Views. Journal of Fixed Income 24 (3, Winter): 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Rebonato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rebonato, R. (2017). Stress Testing with Bayesian Nets and Related Techniques: Meeting the Engineering Challenges. In: Pompella, M., Scordis, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Unconventional Risk Transfer. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59297-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59297-8_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59296-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59297-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics