Spatial Real-Time Price Competition in the Dynamic Spectrum Access Markets

  • Marcel VološinEmail author
  • Juraj Gazda
  • Peter Drotár
  • Gabriel Bugár
  • Vladimír Gazda
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10207)


We present the agent-based model of the real-time spectrum trading market. Real-time means that the frequency spectrum is allocated to the operators in real-time and thus, the capacities of the operators are dynamically varying. The agent-based model consists of the two levels. The first level (the wholesale market) deals with the spectrum distribution towards the operators, where the operators compete for the spectrum resources. The second level (the retail market) presents the place where the operators compete with each-other to provide their services to the end-users. In our model, the operators are assumed to be heterogeneous in terms of the quality of service (QoS) perception. The heterogeneity of the operators exists due to the different placement of their base-stations (BTSs) in the investigated region. The BTS in the middle of the region is naturally favored, because of the unique spectral efficiency it provides to the end-users. We numerically analyze the volumes of the frequency spectra purchased by the operators, average revenue and the retail price of the operators under the consideration of three different pricing mechanisms.


Agent-based modelling Dynamic spectrum access Retail market Spatial competition Wholesale market 



This work was supported by the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic under the contract No. 1/0766/14. This work was also supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency, project number APVV-15-0055 and by European intergovernmental framework COST Action CA15140: Improving Applicability of Nature-Inspired Optimisation by Joining Theory and Practice.


  1. 1.
    Wallsten, S.: Is there really a spectrum crisis? Disentangling the regulatory, physical, and technological factors affecting spectrum license value. Inf. Econ. Policy 35, 7–29 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peha, J.M., Panichpapiboon, S.: Real-time secondary markets for spectrum trading. Telecommun. Policy 28(78), 603–618 (2004). A selection of papers from the 31st Annual Telecommunications Policy Research ConferenceCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zheng, L., Joe-Wong, C., Tan, C.W., Ha, S., Chiang, M.: Secondary markets for mobile data: feasibility and benefits of traded data plans. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pp. 1580–1588. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pan, M., Li, M., Li, P., Fang, Y.: The network architecture for spectrum trading. In: Pan, M., et al. (eds.) Spectrum Trading in Multi-Hop Cognitive Radio Networks. SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering, pp. 1–9. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25631-3_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shi, G., Liu, Y., Mu, X.: Cooperative spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks: a centralized contracted-based approach. Int. J. Multimed. Ubiquit. Eng. 11(3), 351–360 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fortetsanakis, G., Papadopouli, M.: On multi-layer modeling and analysis of wireless access markets. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 14(1), 113–125 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conlisk, J.: Why bounded rationality? J. Econ. Lit. 34(2), 669–700 (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tonmukayakul, A., Weiss, M.B.: A study of secondary spectrum use using agent-based computational economics. NETNOMICS Econ. Res. Electron. Netw. 9(2), 125–151 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xing, Y., Chandramouli, R., Cordeiro, C.: Price dynamics in competitive agile spectrum access markets. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 25(3), 613–621 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yoon, H., Hwang, J., Weiss, M.B.: An analytic research on secondary-spectrum trading mechanisms based on technical and market changes. Comput. Netw. 56(1), 3–19 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pastirčák, J., Friga, L., Kováč, V., Gazda, J., Gazda, V.: An agent-based economy model of real-time secondary market for the cognitive radio networks. J. Netw. Syst. Manag. 24(2), 427–443 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gazda, J., Kováč, V., Tóth, P., Drotár, P., Gazda, V.: Tax optimization in an agent-based model of real-time spectrum secondary market. Telecommun. Syst. 64, 1–16 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karnouskos, S., De Holanda, T.N.: Simulation of a smart grid city with software agents. In: Third UKSim European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation, EMS 2009, pp. 424–429. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gomez-Sanz, J.J., Garcia-Rodriguez, S., Cuartero-Soler, N., Hernandez-Callejo, L.: Reviewing microgrids from a multi-agent systems perspective. Energies 7(5), 3355–3382 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sairamesh, J., Kephart, J.O.: Price dynamics and quality in information markets. Decis. Support Syst. 28(1), 35–47 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grønnevet, G.A., Hansen, B., Reme, B.-A.: Spectrum policy and competition in mobile data. Inf. Econ. Policy 37, 34–41 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sharma, S.K., Chatzinotas, S., Ottersten, B.: Interference alignment for spectral coexistence of heterogeneous networks. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2013(1), 1–14 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim, B.-G., Zhang, Y., van der Schaar, M., Lee, J.-W.: Dynamic pricing for smart grid with reinforcement learning. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), pp. 640–645. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaelbling, L.P., Littman, M.L., Moore, A.W.: Reinforcement learning: a survey. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 4, 237–285 (1996)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Georgilakis, P.S., Orfanos, G.A., Hatziargyriou, N.D.: Computer-assisted interactive learning for teaching transmission pricing methodologies. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 29(4), 1972–1980 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yang, H., Meng, Q., Lee, D.-H.: Trial-and-error implementation of marginal-cost pricing on networks in the absence of demand functions. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 38(6), 477–493 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tisue, S., Wilensky, U.: NetLogo: a simple environment for modeling complexity. In: International Conference on Complex Systems, Boston, MA, vol. 21, pp. 16–21 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Frank, R.H., Glass, A.J.: Microeconomics and Behavior. McGraw-Hill, New York (1991)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcel Vološin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Juraj Gazda
    • 1
  • Peter Drotár
    • 1
  • Gabriel Bugár
    • 2
  • Vladimír Gazda
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computers and InformaticsTechnical University of KosiceKošiceSlovakia
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and Multimedia CommunicationsTechnical University of KosiceKošiceSlovakia
  3. 3.Department of FinanceTechnical University of KosiceKošiceSlovakia

Personalised recommendations