Skip to main content

Advancing Civil Human Rights Culture in Tanzania

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Religion and Civil Human Rights in Empirical Perspective

Part of the book series: Religion and Human Rights ((REHU,volume 2))

Abstract

This contribution investigates the traditional difficulties faced in advancing human rights culture in Tanzania. It describes the sorts of problems, causes and deeper reasons that hinder the advancement and application of human rights in Tanzania. What is the nature of these problems? And what are the possible solutions? Despite the fact that in theory, Tanzania fully embraces human rights, the country falls short when it comes to applying them. We will argue that specific cultural traditions and customs are to blame for human rights abuses. Strict and conservative beliefs and practices in Tanzania do not align with human rights. More specifically, traditional family values and gender-role stereotypes; arranged (child) marriages; belief in witchcraft; and extrajudicial killings and unjust law enforcement are all implicated in causing harm to human rights culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A definition of political rights would be the ability to participate in public affairs, voting rights and the right to equal access to public services. Those include freedom of association, freedom of assembly, freedom of speech, freedom of religion /worship, freedom to participate in political life, and the right to take part in governance (cf. Article 21, 25 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966).

  2. 2.

    https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2015#.VYEywUaRD3Y

References

  • Ballard, P. H. (1979). A Christian perspective on violence. London: British Council of Churches.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1995). Prejudice. Its social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cimpric, A. (2010). Children accused of witchcraft. An anthropological study of contemporary practices in Africa. Dakar: Unicef.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • DIIS Report. (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckitt, J. (1992). The social psychology of prejudice New York/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumbo, C. D. (2011). The interface between human rights and the African concept of community, with special reference to the Ndali people of Tanzania. Teofilo Kisanji University Journal, 2(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumbo, C. D. (2013). The Moravian church response to domestic abuses among couples in Tanzania: A case study of Mbeya municipality, with special reference to (Wa-)Ndali and (Wa-)Nyakyusa traditions (comparison and contrast), PhD dissertation, The Open University, Tanzania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, B. A. (Ed.). (2009). In Black’s law Dictionary (9th ed). West: Thomson Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, P. G. (1992). Cultural anthropology (2nd ed.). Grand Rapids: Baker Book House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. (2014). No way out. Child marriage and human rights abuses in Tanzania. New York [etc.]: HRW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassimoto, T. (2008). A Handbook on Gender Studies in Education: Gender equality, Development and Peace (n.p.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Katapa, R. S. (1994). Arranged marriage. In Z. Tumbo-Masabo & R. Liljestrom (Eds.), Chelewa, Chelewa the dilemma of teenage girls (pp. 76–95). Stockholm: The Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobia, S. (2003). The courage to hope. World Council of Churches: The roots for a new vision and the calling of the Church in Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legal and Human Rights Center [LHRC], & Zanzibar Legal Services Center [ZLSC]. (2012). Tanzania human Rights report 2012. Dar es Salaam/Zanzibar: LHRC& ZlSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legal and Human Rights Center [LHRC] & Zanzibar Legal Services Center [ZLSC]. (2013). Tanzania Human Rights Report 2013. Dar es Salaam/Zanzibar: LHRC& ZlSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matandiko, K. (2013). Mauaji ya kutisha mkoani Simiyu Mwananchi Newspaper 10 Sept 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbiti, J. S. (1970). Concepts of God in Africa. London: S.P.C.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbiti, J. S. (1973). Love and marriage. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbiti, J. S. (1991). African religion and philosophy (2 nd Ed ed.). Oxford: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesaki, S. (2010). Review of witchcraft and the law in Tanzania. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 1(8), 132–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlenge, W. (1994). Revival of Customary Landcare. Ileia Newsletter, 10(2), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkonya, L. K. (2008). Rural water Management in Africa, the impact of customary institutions in Tanzania. New York: Cambria Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nour, N. (2008). An Introduction to Maternal Mortality. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1(2), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center [PEW]. (2014). Global religious diversity. Washington, DC: Pew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilder, K. (1994). Quest for self-esteem. State, Islam, and Mundang ethnicity in northern Cameroon: African studies centre research series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterkens, C. (2007). Reflection on the limits of ‘religious’ explanations of violence. A social psychological perspective. In: Timmerman, C. & Hutsebaut, D. et. al. (eds.). Faith-based radicalism. Christianity, Islam and Judaism between constructive activism and destructive fanaticism (Gods, Humans and Religions 10) (pp. 181–190). Brussels/Oxford [etc.]: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleyman, M. (2013). Are they the law unto themselves? The Citizen newspaper, 8th Feb 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFPA [United Nations Population Fund]. (2012). Ageing in the twenty-first century. London/New York: UNFPA: A celebration and a challenge.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Republic of Tanzania, Population Distribution by Age and Sex. (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ven, J. A., Dreyer, J. S., & Pieterse, H. J. C. (2004). Is there a god of human rights? The complex relationship between human rights and religion. In A south African case. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhoozer, K. J. (1993). The world well staged? Theology, culture, and hermeneutics. In D. A. Carson & J. D. Woodbridge (Eds.), God and culture (pp. 1–30). Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clement Fumbo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fumbo, C., Sterkens, C. (2018). Advancing Civil Human Rights Culture in Tanzania. In: Ziebertz, HG., Sterkens, C. (eds) Religion and Civil Human Rights in Empirical Perspective. Religion and Human Rights, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59285-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59285-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59284-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59285-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics