Skip to main content

Hybrid Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm with Differential Evolution for Process Planning and Scheduling Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering ((LNMUINEN))

Abstract

In an intelligent manufacturing environment, process planning and scheduling (PPS) plays a very important role as a most complex and practical scheduling problem, which processes a set of prismatic parts into completed products by determining the optimal process plans and moments to execute each operation with competitive manufacturing resources. Many research works use multiobjective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) to solve PPS problems with consideration of multiple complicated objectives to be optimized. This paper proposes a hybrid multiobjective evolutionary algorithm with differential evolution (HMOEA-DE) to solve the PPS problem. HMOEA-DE uses a special designed fitness function to evaluate the dominated and nondominated individuals and divides the population and elitism into two parts, which close to the center and edge areas of Pareto frontier. Moreover, differential evolution applied on elitism tries to improve the convergence and distribution performances much more by guiding the search directions through different individuals with different fitness function. Numerical comparisons indicate that the efficacy of HMOEA-DE outperforms the traditional HMOEA without DE in convergence and distribution performances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abbass HA, Sarker R (2011) The pareto differential evolution algorithm. Int J Artif Intell Tools 11(04):531–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali M, Siarry P, Pant M (2012) An efficient differential evolution based algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems. Eur J Oper Res 217(2):404–416

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ausaf MF, Gao L, Li X (2015) Optimization of multi-objective integrated process planning and scheduling problem using a priority based optimization algorithm. Front Mech Eng 10(4):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Babu BV, Jehan MML (2003) Differential evolution for multi-objective optimization. In: The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2003, CEC 2003, vol 4, pp 2696–2703

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deb K, Pratap A et al (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gen M, Cheng R, Lin L (2008) Network models and optimization: Multiobjective genetic algorithm approach

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guo W, Yu X (2014) Non-dominated sorting differential evolution with improved directional convergence and spread for multiobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp 87–88

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iorio AW, Li X (2006) Incorporating directional information within a differential evolution algorithm for multi-objective optimization. In: Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp 691–698

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li H, Zhang Q (2006) A multiobjective differential evolution based on decomposition for multiobjective optimization with variable linkages. In: Parallel Problem Solving From Nature - PPSN Ix, International Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland, 9–13 September 2006, Proceedings, pp 583–592

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nayak A (2015) Multi-objective process planning and scheduling using controlled elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. Int J Prod Res 53(6):1712–1735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Phanden RK, Jain A, Verma R (2013) An approach for integration of process planning and scheduling. Int J Comput Integr Manufact 26(4):284–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Qu BY, Suganthan PN, Liang JJ (2012) Differential evolution with neighborhood mutation for multimodal optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 16(5):601–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Santana-Quintero LV, Coello Coello CA (2005) An algorithm based on differential evolution for multi-objective problems. Int J Comput Intell Res 1(2):151–169

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Schaffer JD (1985) Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms. In: International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp 93–100

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sindhya K, Ruuska S et al (2011) A new hybrid mutation operator for multiobjective optimization with differential evolution. Soft Comput 15(10):2041–2055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Storn R, Price K (1997) Differential evolution – a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim 11(4):341–359

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Xia H, Li X, Gao L (2016) A hybrid genetic algorithm with variable neighborhood search for dynamic integrated process planning and scheduling. Comput Ind Eng 102:99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu X (2010) Introduction to evolutionary algorithms. In: International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, p 1

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang W, Gen M, Jo J (2014) Hybrid sampling strategy-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for process planning and scheduling problem. J Intell Manufact 25(5):881–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L (2001) SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1304609), Foundation for Science & Technology Research Project of Henan Province (162102210044, 152102210068 152102110076), Program for Innovative Research Team (in Science and Technology) in University of Henan Province (17IRTSTHN011), Program for Key Project of Science and Technology in University of Education Department of Henan Province (17A520030), Fundamental Research Funds for the Henan Provincial Colleges and Universities (2014YWQQ12, 2015XTCX03, 2015XTCX04), Research Funds for Key Laboratory of Grain Information Processing and Control (Henan University of Technology) (KFJJ-2015-106), Ministry of Education and the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) of Japan Society of Promotion of Science (JSPS): No. 15K00357.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenqiang Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, C., Zhang, W., Xiao, L., Gen, M. (2018). Hybrid Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm with Differential Evolution for Process Planning and Scheduling Problem. In: Xu, J., Gen, M., Hajiyev, A., Cooke, F. (eds) Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. ICMSEM 2017. Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59280-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59280-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59279-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59280-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics