Advertisement

Long Term Behavior of Dynamic Equilibria in Fluid Queuing Networks

  • Roberto Cominetti
  • José Correa
  • Neil OlverEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10328)

Abstract

A fluid queuing network constitutes one of the simplest models in which to study flow dynamics over a network. In this model we have a single source-sink pair and each link has a per-time-unit capacity and a transit time. A dynamic equilibrium (or equilibrium flow over time) is a flow pattern over time such that no flow particle has incentives to unilaterally change its path. Although the model has been around for almost fifty years, only recently results regarding existence and characterization of equilibria have been obtained. In particular the long term behavior remains poorly understood. Our main result in this paper is to show that, under a natural (and obviously necessary) condition on the queuing capacity, a dynamic equilibrium reaches a steady state (after which queue lengths remain constant) in finite time. Previously, it was not even known that queue lengths would remain bounded. The proof is based on the analysis of a rather non-obvious potential function that turns out to be monotone along the evolution of the equilibrium. Furthermore, we show that the steady state is characterized as an optimal solution of a certain linear program. When this program has a unique solution, which occurs generically, the long term behavior is completely predictable. On the contrary, if the linear program has multiple solutions the steady state is more difficult to identify as it depends on the whole temporal evolution of the equilibrium.

References

  1. 1.
    Cominetti, R., Correa, J., Larré, O.: Dynamic equilibria in fluid queueing networks. Oper. Res. 63(1), 21–34 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ford, L.R., Fulkerson, D.R.: Constructing maximal dynamic flows from static flows. Oper. Res. 6, 419–433 (1958)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Friesz, T.L., Bernstein, D., Smith, T.E., Tobin, R.L., Wie, B.W.: A variational inequality formulation of the dynamic network user equilibrium problem. Ope. Res. 41(1), 179–191 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gale, D.: Transient flows in networks. Mich. Math. J. 6, 59–63 (1959)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koch, R., Skutella, M.: Nash equilibria and the price of anarchy for flows over time. Theor. Comput. Syst. 49, 71–97 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Merchant, D.K., Nemhauser, G.L.: A model and an algorithm for the dynamic traffic assignment problems. Transp. Sci. 12, 183–199 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Merchant, D.K., Nemhauser, G.L.: Optimality conditions for a dynamic traffic assignment model. Transp. Sci. 12, 200–207 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meunier, F., Wagner, N.: Equilibrium results for dynamic congestion games. Transp. Sci. 44(4), 524–536 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peeta, S., Ziliaskopoulos, A.K.: Foundations of dynamic traffic assignment: the past, the present and the future. Netw. Spat. Econ. 1(3–4), 233–265 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ran, B., Boyce, D.: Modeling Dynamic Transportation Networks. Springer, Berlin (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vickrey, W.S.: Congestion theory and transport investment. Am. Econ. Rev. 59(2), 251–260 (1969)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xu, Y.W., Wu, J.H., Florian, M., Marcotte, P., Zhu, D.L.: Advances in the continuous dynamic network loading problem. Transp. Sci. 33(4), 341–353 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhu, D., Marcotte, P.: On the existence of solutions to the dynamic user equilibrium problem. Transp. Sci. 34(4), 402–414 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de Ingeniería y CienciasUniversidad Adolfo IbáñezSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Facultad de Ingeniería IndustrialUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile
  3. 3.Department of Econometrics and Operations ResearchVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
  4. 4.CWIAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations