Abstract
The need to develop a bottom up curriculum for Roma students (preschool education) in order to support their learning at school—language and mathematics—and with a view to contribute to their social inclusion through an ethnomathematical perspective led us to conduct fieldwork on the Roma students’ community of origin. The ethnomathematical perspective supported the combination of a critical ethnographical fieldwork using critical communicative methodology (CCM) for exploring students’ funds of knowledge as well as the parameters that affect Roma children’s education . Poststructural ideas such as power/power relations contributed to understanding how inequalities are constructed through discursive practices, making the inclusion of Roma (and other marginalized groups) merely rhetorical. The pragmatological material, discourse, discursive practices, practices, representations etc.; derived from the community informed both our practices/our interventions in the kindergarten, and our future actions in the community aiming to respond in social justice issues, important for both Roma and non Roma communities.
I understand access and participation as Social Justice.
—D’Ambrosio (2012)
Project: “Education of Roma children in the Epirus, Ionian Islands, Thessaly and Western Greece”, 2010–2015 (E.U. Lifelong Learning, action code: 304263).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
See Bishop (1988, 2002).
- 2.
Despite, the official rhetoric at the school where I conducted the research there were two classes purely of Roma children, constituted by children from 7 to 12 years old.
- 3.
Our project included all Thessaly area, a big part of all Greece. The communities we were working with are characterizing by diversity about the broaden society, among them and inside them.
- 4.
The analysis of the two terms exceeds the objectives of this work, but it is necessary a basic reference. Many authors use alternative or complementary the terms. In short, we could say that “being postmodern indicates a historical, sociological point of view. Being poststructural indicates a strategy of analysis” (Yeaman et al., p. 26).
- 5.
In some other cases we took into consideration the needs that were emerged through our communication in the next project’s application (Inclusion and education of Roma children in the region of Thessaly-code 5001369 and IIS integration Judgment A.P.17556/10.14.2016) that has started in November, 2016). For example, among other initiatives we established a school for the parents of Roma students for familiarizing them with the school structure and whatever constitutes the school in order to be able to support their children.
- 6.
The main pragmatological material used here it is coming from this particular community of Aliveri.
- 7.
The above communicative incidence took place the last school year. At this time, his family was living in a house and his children attended school. This school year, because the retailer license is on the name of his wife, they have to move together all around the country, making children’s school attendance problematic. The response to this situation was to send the boy to his grandparents and to stop girl’s attendance.
- 8.
It happens very often to be included in this classes students that have no learning difficulties; students that have just a different cultural background, illegally.
References
Appelbaum, P. (1995). Popular culture, educational discourse, and mathematics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Appelbaum, P. (2002). Multicultural and diversity education: A reference handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
Appelbaum, P. (2008). Embracing mathematics: On becoming a teacher and changing with mathematics. New York, NY: Routledge.
Appelbaum, P., & Stathopoulou, C. (2016). Critical issues in culture and mathematics learning. In L. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 336–358). New York, NY: Routledge.
Barton, B. (1996). Ethnomathematics: Exploring cultural diversity in mathematics. Doctoral dissertation. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.
Becker, R., & Tremel, P. (2011). Bildungseffekte vorschulischer betreuung, erziehung und bildung fuer migranten im deutschen schulsystem. In R. Becker (Ed.), Integration durch Bildung (pp. 57–70). Wiesbaden, Deutschland: VS Verlag.
Bello, S. E. L. (2010). Language games, discursive practices and truth production: contributions to contemporary (mathematical) education, Special Edition (Vol. 18, pp. 545–588). Zetetike.
Bishop, A. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble. New York, NY: Routledge.
Borba, M. C. (1990). Ethnomathematics and education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 10(1), 39–43.
Brown, T. (2010). Cultural continuity and consensus in mathematics education. Special Issue on Critical Mathematics Education. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 25, Online.
Caterino, B. (2013). Phronesis and the participants’ perspective. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(4), 739–745.
Carraher, T. (1988). Street mathematics and school mathematics. In A. Borbás (Ed.), Proceedings of the twelfth annual meeting of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 1–23). Veszprem: Hungary International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
D’Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44–48.
D’Ambrosio, U. (2012). Mathematicians, mathematics educators and the state of the world. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 5–28.
D’Ambrosio, U. (2007). Peace, social justice and ethnomathematics. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, Monograph, 1, 25–34.
Dowling, P. (1993). Mathematics, theoretical “totems”: A sociological language for educational practice. Political Dimensions of Mathematics Education, 2, 35–52.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish (p. 191) (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage, 1979.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. 1) (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York, NY: Vintage.
Freitas, E., & Walshaw, M. (2016). Alternative theoretical frameworks for mathematics education research: Theory meets data. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Fuchs-Rechlin & Bergmann, C. (2014). Der abbau von bildungsbenachteiligung durch kindertagesbetreuung für unter 3-Jährige—zwischen wunsch und wirklichkeit. In K. Maaz, J. Baumert, & M. Neumann (Hrsg.), Herkunft und bildungserfolg von der frühen Kindheit bis ins erwachsenenalter. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, Sonderheft 17/2014 (pp. 95–118). Wiesbaden, Deutchsland: VS Verlag.
Gana, E., Stathopoulou, C., & Govaris, C. (2016). Expanded pedagogical spaces: enhancing Roma students involvement to school. Paper presented at the Conference Rethinking Language, Diversity and Education, 2015. Rhodes, Greece University of the Aegean.
Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Geertz, C. (1973a). Religion as a cultural system. In: The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays (pp. 87–125). NewYork, NY: Basic Books.
Geertz, C. (1973b). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In: The interpretation of cultures selected essays (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gutiérrez, R. (2009). Embracing the inherent tensions in teaching mathematics from an equity stance. Democracy and Education, 18(3), 9–16.
Gerdes, P. (1994). Reflections on ethnomathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(2), 19–21.
Gogolin, Ι. (2009). Förderung von kindern mit migrationshintergrund im elementarbereich. Ιn Roßbach, H-G., Blossfeld, H-P. (Hrsg.), Früpädagogische förderung in institutionen. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, Sonderheft 11/2008 (pp. 79–90). Wiesbaden, Deutchsland: VS Verlag.
Gómez, A., Puigvert, L., & Flecha, R. (2011). Critical communicative methodology: Informing real social transformation through research. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(3), 235–245.
Govaris, C. (2005). Intercultural pedagogy: Recognition relationships in multicultural school. In Aluffi-Pentini, A. (Ed.), Intercultural workshop: Reception and interaction in a multicultural learning environment (pp. 9–24). Athens, Greece: Atrapos.
Govaris, C. (2013). Intercultural pedagogy: Thoughts and positions from the perspective of the theory of education. In: Govaris (Ed.), Teaching and learning in intercultural school (pp. 17–30). Athens, Greece: Gutenberg.
Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68.
Gutiérrez, R., & Dixon-Román, E. (2011). Beyond gap gazing: How can thinking about education comprehensively help us (re)envision mathematics education? In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 21–34). New York, NY: Springer.
Hasselhorn, M., & Kuger, S. (2014). Wirksamkeit schulrelevanter Förderung in Kindertagesstätten. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17(2), 299–314.
Knijnik, G. (1998). Ethnomathematics and postmodern thinking: Conver/divergences. In P. Gates (Ed.), Proceedings of the First International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 248–252). Nottingham, England: Nottingham University.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19–44). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press 176.
Mesquita, M., Pais, A., & François, K. (2014). Communitarian mathematics education: Walking into boundaries. Em Teia: Revista de Educação Matemática e Tecnológica, 5(1), 1–18.
Mishra, V. (2012). What was multiculturalism? Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Publishing.
Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70.
Moschkovich, J. (2007). Examining mathematical discourse practices. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(1), 24–30.
Noula, I., Cowan, S., & Govaris, C. (2015). Democratic governance for inclusion: A case study of a Greek primary school welcoming Roma pupils. British Journal of Educational Studies, 63, 47–66.
Pais, Α., & Valero, P. (2012). Researching research: Mathematics education in the political. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 9–24.
Papachristou, D. (2014). Literacy practices and orality of Roma students. Master Dissertation. Mytilene, Greece: University of Aegean.
Rosa, M., & Orey, D. C. (2011). Ethnomathematics: The cultural aspects of mathematics. Revista Latinoamericana de Ethnomatemática, 4(2), 32–54.
Sousa Santos, B. (2012). Public sphere and epistemologies of the South. Africa Development, 37(1), 43–67.
Stathopoulou, C. (2005). Ethnomathematics: Exploring the cultural dimension of mathematics and of mathematics education. Athens, Greece: Atrapos.
Stathopoulou, C., & Appelbaum, P. (2016). Dignity, recognition, and reconciliation: Forgiveness, ethnomathematics, and mathematics education. International Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 6(1), 26–44.
Stathopoulou, C., & Kalabasis, F. (2007). Language and culture in mathematics education: Reflections on observing a Romany class in a Greek school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(2), 231–238.
Stinson, D. W., & Bullock, E. C. (2015). Critical postmodern methodology in mathematics education research: Promoting another way of thinking and looking. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 25th Anniversary Issue (29), 1–18.
Taylor, N. (1993). Desire, repression and ethnomathematics. In C. Julie & D. Angelis (Eds.), Political Dimensions of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 130–137).
UNESCO (2014). Inclusion from the start-Guidelines on inclusive early childhood care and education for Roma children. UNESCO Council of Europe. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002275/227503e.pdf.
Valai, Ph., Gana, E., Stathopoulou, C., & Govaris, C. (2015). Roma students use and design maps in the kindergarten. In D. Desli, I. Papadopoulos & M. Tzekaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th National Conference of EN.E.DI.M: Mathematics with Distinction and without Discrimination (pp. 279–288). Thessaloniki, Greece: ENEDIM.
Vithal, R., & Skovsmose, O. (1997). The end of innocence: A critique of ethnomathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(2), 131–157.
Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason. London, England: Routledge.
Walshaw, M. (2007). Working with Foucault in education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Zaslavsky, C. (1994). Africa counts and ethnomathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(2), 3–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stathopoulou, C. (2017). Once Upon a Time… The Gypsy Boy Turned 15 While Still in the First Grade. In: Rosa, M., Shirley, L., Gavarrete, M., Alangui, W. (eds) Ethnomathematics and its Diverse Approaches for Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59220-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59220-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59219-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59220-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)