Skip to main content

Color Independent Quality Assessment of 3D Printed Surfaces Based on Image Entropy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Recognition Systems CORES 2017 (CORES 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 578))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper is focused on the issue of visual quality assessment of 3D printed surfaces which can be helpful in detection of quality decrease during the printing process as well as the quality inspection of previously printed objects. The basic assumption of the proposed approach is the fact that each distortion of the regular patterns, visible on the side surfaces of objects printed using Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) technology, causes the increase of the local image entropy. However, due to different colors of the filaments used in our experiments, a reliable prediction of the absolute entropy values can be troublesome. The proposed solution utilizes the combined quality indicator based on the entropy and its variance calculated for the hue component, as well as for the RGB channels, depending on the color of the filament, allowing proper detection of low quality surfaces regardless of the filament’s color.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Battisti, F., Bosc, E., Carli, M., Callet, P.L., Perugia, S.: Objective image quality assessment of 3D synthesized views. Signal Process. Image Commun. 30, 78–88 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benoit, A., Le Callet, P., Campisi, P., Cousseau, R.: Quality assessment of stereoscopic images. EURASIP J. Image Video Process. 2008(1), 659024 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chandler, D.M.: Seven challenges in image quality assessment: past, present, and future research. ISRN Signal Process. 2013, 53 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chauhan, V., Surgenor, B.: A comparative study of machine vision based methods for fault detection in an automated assembly machine. Procedia Manufact. 1, 416–428 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, M.J., Cormack, L.K., Bovik, A.C.: No-reference quality assessment of natural stereopairs. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(9), 3379–3391 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, M.J., Su, C.C., Kwon, D.K., Cormack, L.K., Bovik, A.C.: Full-reference quality assessment of stereopairs accounting for rivalry. Signal Process. Image Commun. 28(9), 1143–1155 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng, Y., Jafari, M.A.: Vision-based online process control in manufacturing applications. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 5(1), 140–153 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang, T., Jafari, M.A., Bakhadyrov, I., Safari, A., Danforth, S., Langrana, N.: Online defect detection in layered manufacturing using process signature. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 5, San Diego, California, USA, pp. 4373–4378 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fastowicz, J., Okarma, K.: Texture based quality assessment of 3D prints for different lighting conditions. In: Chmielewski, L.J., Datta, A., Kozera, R., Wojciechowski, K. (eds.) ICCVG 2016. LNCS, vol. 9972, pp. 17–28. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46418-3_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldmann, L., Simone, F.D., Ebrahimi, T.: A comprehensive database and subjective evaluation methodology for quality of experience in stereoscopic video. In: 3D Image Processing (3DIP) and Applications. Proceedings of SPIE, No. 7526 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guo, J., Vidal, V., Cheng, I., Basu, A., Baskurt, A., Lavoue, G.: Subjective and objective visual quality assessment of textured 3D meshes. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 14(2), 11:1–11:20 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, Y., Wu, J.: Quality assessment of stereoscopic 3D image compression by binocular integration behaviors. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23(4), 1527–1542 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Moughlbay, A.A., Cervera, E., Martinet, P.: Model based visual servoing tasks with an autonomous humanoid robot. In: Lee, S. (ed.) Frontiers of Intelligent Autonomous Systems. SCI, vol. 466, pp. 149–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35485-4_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Okarma, K., Fastowicz, J.: No-reference quality assessment of 3D prints based on the GLCM analysis. In: 2016 21st International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), pp. 788–793 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Okarma, K., Fastowicz, J.: Quality assessment of 3D prints based on feature similarity metrics. In: Choraś, R. (ed.) Image Processing and Communications Challenges 8. AISC, vol. 525, pp. 104–111. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47274-4_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Okarma, K., Fastowicz, J., Tecław, M.: Application of structural similarity based metrics for quality assessment of 3D prints. In: Chmielewski, L.J., Datta, A., Kozera, R., Wojciechowski, K. (eds.) ICCVG 2016. LNCS, vol. 9972, pp. 244–252. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46418-3_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Starch, J., Kilner, J., Hilton, A.: Objective quality assessment in free-viewpoint video production. In: Proceedings of the 3DTV Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 225–228 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Straub, J.: Initial work on the characterization of additive manufacturing (3D printing) using software image analysis. Machines 3(2), 55–71 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Szkilnyk, G., Hughes, K., Surgenor, B.: Vision based fault detection of automated assembly equipment. In: Proceedings of the ASME/IEEE International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications, Parts A and B, vol. 3, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 691–697 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tourloukis, G., Stoyanov, S., Tilford, T., Bailey, C.: Data driven approach to quality assessment of 3D printed electronic products. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology (ISSE), Eger, Hungary, pp. 300–305, May 2015

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yang, J., Hou, C., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Z., Guo, J.: Objective quality assessment method of stereo images. In: Proceedings of the 3DTV Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video, Potsdam, Germany, pp. 1–4 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krzysztof Okarma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Okarma, K., Fastowicz, J. (2018). Color Independent Quality Assessment of 3D Printed Surfaces Based on Image Entropy. In: Kurzynski, M., Wozniak, M., Burduk, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Recognition Systems CORES 2017. CORES 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 578. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59162-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59162-9_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59161-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59162-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics