Abstract
A reductive view of science usually leads to categorizing the various sciences in terms of a strict hierarchy of significance. At the top are the social sciences, then comes psychology, below it follow neuroscience and biology, then chemistry, and finally physics at the bottom. In this scheme, it must be quickly added, being lower on the totem pole is considered better, more fundamental, closer to the final theory of everything. Conversely, a higher position suggests adjectives such as derivative and applied. Within this logic, psychology is just applied biology (biology of the brain), biology is applied chemistry (the chemistry of cells), chemistry is merely applied physics (the physics of molecules). Even within traditional science disciplines, a hierarchy is set up. For instance, within biology there is microbiology at the bottom and ecology, botany, or physiology near the top. In physics, elementary particle physics is near the bottom and atomic, molecular, condensed-matter, astro- and bio-physics near the top (roughly in that order). Reductionism forces the sciences into strict evaluative schemes and compartments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
W.T. Newsome, Human freedom and ‘emergence’, in Downward Causation and the Neurobiology of Free Will, ed. by N. Murphy et al. (Springer, Berlin, 2009)
E. van den Haag, On faith, in Religious Experience and Truth, ed. by S. Hook (New York University Press, New York, 1961)
P. Tillich, Dynamics of Faith (Harper & Brother, New York, 1957)
N. deGrasse Tyson, Real Time with Bill Maher, October 2012
J. Polkinghorne, Science and Religion in Quest of Truth (Yale University Press, New Haven, 2011)
S. Weinberg, Dreams of a Final Theory (Random House, New York, 1994)
S. Kauffman, Beyond reductionism: reinventing the sacred (2006). Edge.com (Edge Foundation). Retrieved 24 Apr 17
C. Clinton, Harriet Tubman (Little, Brown, New York, 2004)
S. Bradford, Harriet Tubman (Corinth Books, New York, 1961)
J. Hick, Faith and Knowledge (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1966)
R. Abelson, The logic of faith and belief, in Religious Experience and Truth, ed. by S. Hook (New York University Press, New York, 1961)
J. Smith, The Analogy of Experience: An Approach to Understanding Religious Truth, Chap. I (Harper & Row, New York, 1973)
J. Hick, Meaning and truth in theology, in Religious Experience and Truth, ed. by S. Hook (New York University Press, New York, 1961)
G.K. Gyatso, Joyful Path of Good Fortune, 2nd edn. (Tharpa, London, 1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
English, L.Q. (2017). Larger Lessons. In: There Is No Theory of Everything. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59150-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59150-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59149-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59150-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)