Abstract
Reading literature is important, but problematic. In Quora and other PhD forums, students moan about their frustrating reading and literature review experiences. Strategic reading might help. This term is coined to conceive of reading as a process of constructing meaning by interacting with text in a targeted way. The fact that strategic reading is purpose-driven suggests that the purpose might qualify the reading. If this purpose is Design Science Research (DSR), what would be the strategy for reading? Traditionally, students are encouraged to annotate while reading. Digital annotations are expected to be useful for supporting comprehension and interpretation. Our belief is that strategic reading can be more effective if annotation is conducted in direct relationship to a main DS activity: root-cause analysis (RCA). RCA can provide the questions whose answers should be sought in the literature. Unfortunately, this process is not supported by current tools. When reading papers, researchers might not be all aware of the issues being raised during RCA. And the other way around, when it comes to RCA, evidences found in the literature might not be promptly accessible. This paper reports on research to develop a technical solution to this problem: a plug-in for Google Chrome that provides seamless integration between the RCA platform (i.e. MindMeister) and the reading platforms (i.e. Mendeley). The aim: improving RCA awareness while reading so that annotations can be traced back to the RCA issues. First evaluations are positive as for improving reading focus and facilitating reference recoverability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
McEwan, E.: The power of strategic reading instruction. In: Seven Strategies of Highly Effective Readers: Using Cognitive Research to Boost K-8 Achievement. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks (2004)
Renear, A.H., Palmer, C.L.: Strategic reading, ontologies, and the future of scientific publishing. Science 325(5942), 828–832 (2009)
Venable, J.R., Baskerville, R.: Eating our own cooking: Toward a more rigorous design science of research methods. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods 10(2), 141–153 (2012)
Raphael, T.E., Englert, C.S.: Writing and reading: partners in constructing meaning. Read. Teach. 43(6), 388–400 (1990)
Wallace, M., Wray, A.: Critical Reading and Writing for Postgraduates, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks (2016)
Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Haustein, S., Larivière, V.: Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66(9), 1832–1846 (2015)
Ruben, A.: How to read a scientific paper. http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2016/01/how-read-scientific-paper. Accessed 6 Feb 2017
Quora: I am a robotics PhD student and I have a hard time reading research papers. I am very slow at it and find the task kind of boring. Is there any way I can make paper reading fun and become faster at it? https://www.quora.com/Iam-a-robotics-PhD-student-and-I-have-a-hard-time-reading-research-papers-Iam-very-slow-at-it-and-find-the-task-kind-of-boring-Is-there-any-way-I-can-makepaper-reading-fun-and-become-faster-at-it. Accessed 6 Feb 2017
Quora: PhD students: how do you keep your notes while reading scientific papers? https://www.quora.com/PhD-students-How-do-you-keep-your-notes-while-reading-scientific-papers. Accessed 6 Feb 2017
Rodriguez, N.: Infographic: how to read a scientific paper. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/infographic-how-to-read-a-scientific-paper. Accessed 6 Feb 2017
Purugganan, M., Hewitt, J.: How to read a scientific article. http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~cainproj/courses/HowToReadSciArticle.pdf. Accessed 6 Feb 2017
Pain, E.: How to (seriously) read a scientific paper. http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2016/03/how-seriously-read-scientific-paper. Accessed 6 Feb 2017
Israel, S.E., Duffy, G.G.: Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension. Routledge, Abingdon (2014)
Margolin, S.J., Driscoll, C., Toland, M.J., Kegler, J.L.: E-readers, computer screens, or paper: does reading comprehension change across media platforms? Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 27(4), 512–519 (2013)
Stern, P., Shalev, L.: The role of sustained attention and display medium in reading comprehension among adolescents with ADHD and without it. Res. Dev. Disabil. 34(1), 431–439 (2013)
Marshall, C.C.: Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. In: 9th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia: Links, Objects, Time and Space, pp. 40–49, ACM, New York (1998)
O’hara, K., Sellen, A.: A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In: ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 335–342. ACM, New York (1997)
Wikipedia: Mindmeister. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MindMeister. Accessed 6 Feb 2017
Johannesson, P., Perjons, E.: An Introduction to Design Science. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Venable, J.R.: Using Coloured Cognitive Mapping (CCM) for design science research. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds.) DESRIST 2014. LNCS, vol. 8463, pp. 345–359. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8_25
Wikipedia: Mendeley. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mendeley. Accessed 6 Feb 2017
Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W.: Design Research in Information Systems. AISWorld (2004). http://desrist.org/design-research-in-information-systems/. Accessed 6 Feb 2017
Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W.: Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)
Karsai, G., Lang, A., Neema, S.: Design patterns for open tool integration. Softw. Syst. Model. 4(2), 157–170 (2005)
Acknowledgments
First author is in debt with Antoni Olivé for introducing him to DSR. This work is co-supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education, and the European Social Fund under contract TIN2014-58131-R. Contell has a doctoral grant from the University of the Basque Country.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Díaz, O., Contell, J.P., Venable, J.R. (2017). Strategic Reading in Design Science: Let Root-Cause Analysis Guide Your Readings. In: Maedche, A., vom Brocke, J., Hevner, A. (eds) Designing the Digital Transformation. DESRIST 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10243. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59144-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59144-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59143-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59144-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)