Abstract
The developmental importance of informal and experiential learning in child and adolescent development has been well documented. The terms non-academic and non-cognitive are increasingly being used to describe abilities that are important for educational success, reflecting tenets of positive youth development. Indeed, educators, policy makers and end-users are now calling for more and better learning opportunities and better and broader learning outcomes. After-school leaders and positive youth development researchers and champions have a unique opportunity to inform and even shape these new discussions. Doing so, however, will require greater discipline and closer collaboration between researchers and practitioners than has been needed in the past. This chapter reflects on the history and importance of the relationship between the after-school and positive youth development fields and presents next steps for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers who want to help move positive youth development principles more firmly into after-school policy and practice. Doing so would not only position after-school programs as critical contexts for positive youth development, but demonstrate the transferability and relevance of the assessment, training and improvement tools created for after-school programs for other systems and settings charged with supporting youths’ learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
21st CCLC Program Goal: To establish community learning centers that help students in high-poverty, low-performing schools meet academic achievement standards; to offer a broad array of additional services designed to complement the regular program; and to offer families of students opportunities for educational development (DOE 2005, Web site; Chappell, 2006).
- 3.
Specific examples associated with these trends are numerous but include: (a) the Noyce Foundation’s investments in programming and advocacy for STEM in afterschool, Mayoral commitments tracked through the National League of Cities, including cities as varied as New York City and Grand Rapids, Michigan. Superintendent and mayoral leadership in the cities associated with the Every Hour Counts network, the Wallace Foundation’s support of both the Afterschool Alliance (on disparities in availability) and the Chicago Consortium on School Reform (on noncognitive skills), the Nellie Mae Foundation’s support for student videos focused on reimagining learning, and the Youth Transition Funders Group’s commitment to developing a well-being framework for child welfare and juvenile justice programs.
- 4.
NAS Report, 2010. Committee on Advancing Social Science Theory.
References
Akiva, T., Cortina, K. S., Eccles, J. S., & Smith, C. (2013). Youth belonging and cognitive engagement in organized activities: A large-scale field study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 208–218. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2013.05.001
Carnegie Council on Adolesent Development. (1992). A matter of time: Risk and opportunity in the nonschool hours. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Catalano, R. F., Berglund, M. L., Ryan, J. A. M., Lonczak, H. S., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluation of positive youth development programs. Annals of the American Academy, 591, 98–124.
Chappell, S. V. (2006). Children “at Risk”: Constructions of childhood in the 21st century community learning centers federal after-school program. Arts Education Policy Review, 108(2), 9–16. doi:10.3200/AEPR.108.2.9-16
Dawes, N. P., & Larson, R. (2011). How youth get engaged: Grounded-theory research on motivational development in organized youth programs. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 259–269.
Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2010). A meta-analysis of after-school programs that seek to promote personal and social skills in children and adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45(3–4), 294–309.
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2010). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.
Eccles, J., & Gootman, J. (Eds.). (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Farrington, C., Roderick, M., Johnson, D. W., Keyes, T. S., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., et al. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners: The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.
Hall, G., Fay Poston, K., & Dennehy, 2017. Summer Learning Programs: Investigating strengths and challenges. In N.L. Deutsch (Ed.), After-School Programs and Youth Development (Vol. 2): Learning from Specific Models. SpringerBriefs in Psychology. Spring International Publishing.
Halpern, R. (2002). A different kind of child development institution: The history of after-school programs for low-income children. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 178–211.
Halpern, R. (2003). Making play work: The promise of after-school programs for low-income children. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hess, F. M. (2010). The same thing over and over: How school reformers get stuck on yesterday’s ideas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Larson, R., Hansen, D., & Moneta, G. (2006). Differing profiles of developmental experiences across types of organized youth activities. Developmental Psychology, 42, 849–863.
Larson, R., Hansen, D. M., & Moneta, G. (2005). Profiles of development experiences in organized youth activities. Urbana, IL: Department of Human and Community Development, University of Illinois (unpublished manuscript).
Lippman, L. H., & Rivers, A. (2008). Assessing school engagement: A guide for out-of-school time program practitioners. Research-to-Results Brief. Washington, D.C.: Child Trends.
Lippman, L. H., Ryberg, R., Terzian, M., Moore, K. A., Humble, J., & McIntosh, H. (2014). Positive and protective factors in adolescent well-being (pp. 2823–2866). Handbook of Child Well-Being: Netherlands, Dordrecht.
Mahoney, J. L., Vandell, D. L., Simpkins, S., & Zarrett, N. (2009). Adolescent out-of-school activities. Handbook of adolescent psychology: (2nd ed., Vol. 2, Ser. 7). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Naftzger, N. (2014). A summary of three studies exploring the relationship between afterschool program quality and youth outcomes. Paper presented at the Ready by 21 National Meeting, Covington, KY.
Pearce, N. J., & Larson, R. W. (2010). How teens become engaged in youth development programs: The process of motivational change in a civic activism organization. Applied Developmental Science, 10, 121–131.
Pellegrino, J. W. E., & Hilton, M. L. E. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Positive Youth Development. (n.d.). Retrieved May 19, 2016, from http://youth.gov/youth-topics/positive-youth-development
Rusk, N., Larson, R. W., Raffaelli, M., Walker, K., Washington, L., Gutierrez, V., . . . Cole Perry, S. (2013). Positive youth development in organized programs: How teens learn to manage emotions. In C. Proctor & P. A. Linley (Eds.), Research, applications, and interventions for children and adolescents: A positive psychology perspective (pp. 247–261). Dordrecht: Springer.
Salusky, I., Larson, R., Griffith, A., Wu, J., Raffaelli, M., Sugimur, N., & Guzman, M. (in press). How adolescents develop responsibility: What can be learned from youth programs. Journal of Adolescent Research.
Smith, C., Hallman, S., Hillaker, B., Sugar, S., McGovern, G., & Devaney, E. (2012). Development and early validation evidence for an observational measure of high quality instructional practice for science, technology, engineering and mathematics in out-of-school time settings: The stem supplement to the youth program quality assessment (pp. 1–25). Ypsilanti, MI: The David P. Weikart Center for Youth Program Quality, a division of the Forum for Youth Investment and Providence Afterschool Alliance.
Tyack, D. B., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia : A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Watkins, N. D., Larson, R. W., & Sullivan, P. J. (2007). Bridging intergroup difference in a community youth program. American Behavioral Scientist, 51(3), 24. (Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pittman, K. (2017). Why After-School Matters for Positive Youth Development. In: Deutsch, N. (eds) After-School Programs to Promote Positive Youth Development. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59132-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59132-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59131-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59132-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)