Skip to main content

Quandaries of Assessment and Accountability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 622 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to discuss quandaries that educational administrators may face relative to accountability and assessment in pre-Kindergarten (pK-12) schools as leaders of learning for instructional improvement and capacity building for a culture of assessment and accountability. From the Voices 3 interview data, transcriptions of focus groups that were held with principals throughout the nation were analyzed to discern the challenges in implementation of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) as a lens for considering challenges that may be faced today with the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) requirements. The primary challenges were identified as fitting three themes: consideration of “What’s Best for Students,” facilitating instructional improvement and balancing the press for time with development of a positive culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abedi, J. (2004). The No Child Left Behind Act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Researcher, 33, 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, S. (Ed.). (2012). School leadership for authentic families and community partnerships: Research perspectives for transforming practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teaching Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L. G. (1994). Reclaiming educational administration as a caring profession. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, L., & Murphy, J. (1993). Understanding the principalship: Metaphorical Themes 1920s–1990s. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, G. T., Fulmer, C. L., Murphy, M. J., & Muth, R. (2007). Principal accomplishments: How school leaders succeed. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., Lankford, H., & Wyckoff, J. (2008). Increasing the effectiveness of teachers in low-performing schools. In H. Ladd & E. Fiske (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (pp. 535–550). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykin, A. W., & Noguera, P. (2011). Creating the opportunity to learn: Moving from research to practice to close the achievement gap. Alexandria: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenoweth, K. (2009). How it’s being done: Urgent lessons from unexpected schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantley, M. E. (2005). Moral leadership: Shifting the management paradigm. In F. W. English (Ed.), The Sage handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory, research, and practice (pp. 34–46). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Designing the ‘new accountability:” How public scholars can contribute to a productive policy framework for education. AERA Distinguished Lecture. Webcasts: 2016 Annualmeeting, Washington, DC. Retrieved at www.aera.net/Newsroom/Digital-Media_Gallery

  • Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and Abroad. School Redesign Network at Stanford University. Dallas: National Staff Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson Jr., G. A. (2006). Cultivating leadership in schools: Connecting people, purpose, and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuFour, R., & Fullan, M. (2013). Cultures built to last; Systemic PLCs at work. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fancera, S. I., & Bliss, J. R. (2011). Instructional leadership influence on collective teacher efficacy to improve student achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10, 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedberg, L. (2016). Education secretary takes heat for pushing single rating of schools. EdSource: Highlighting strategies for student success. Retrieved from https://edsource.org/2016/education-secretary-takes-heat-for-pushing-…

  • Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., & Quinn, J. (2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, R., Goodard, Y., Kim, E. S., & Miller, R. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. L. (2015). Leading for urban school reform and community development. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(5), 679–711. doi:10.1177/0013161X15577694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A. T., & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections in students’ achievement. Austin: National Center of Family and Community Connections with Schools/Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. A., & North, C. E. (2012). Beyond popular cultural and structural arguments: Imagining a compass to guide burgeoning urban achievement gap scholars. Education and Urban Society, 44(3), 274–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishimaru, A. (2013). From heroes to organizers: Principals and education organizing in urban school reform. Education Administration Quarterly, 49(1), 3–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, S., & Day, C. (2007). The International Successful School Principals’ Project (ISSPP): An overview of the project, the case studies and their contents. International Studies in Educational Administration, 43(6), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, S., Johnson, L., Ylimaki, R., & Giles, C. (2005). Successful leadership in challenging US schools: Enabling principles, enabling schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 607–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaser, L., & Halbert, J. (2009). Leadership mindsets: Innovation and learning in the transformation of schools. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killion, J., & Ray, P. (2009). Becoming a learning school. Oxford: National Staff Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klar, H. W., & Brewer, C. A. (2013). Successful leadership in high-needs schools: An examination of core leadership practices enacted in challenging contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(5), 768–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. P., Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F., & Stetcher, B. M. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us? Santa Monica: The RAND Corporation.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. S., Copland, M. A., Honig, M. I., Plecki, M. L., &Portin, B. S. (2010). Learning-focused leadership and leadership support: Meaning and practice in urban systems. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy-University of Washington. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/school-leadership/key-research/Documents/Focused-Leadership-and-Support-in-Urban-Systems.pdf

  • Ladson Billings, G. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American students (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. (2008). Is test-driven external accountability effective? Synthesizing the evidence from cross-state causal-comparative and correlational studies. Review of Educational Research, 78, 608–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (2011). Leadership and student learning: What works and how. In J. Robertson & H. Tinpeley (Eds.), Leadership and learning (pp. 41–53). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S., &Wahlstrom, D. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. (Report for the Wallace Foundation). New York: The Wallace Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezotte, L. (1994). The nexus of instructional leadership and effective schools. School Administrator, 51(6), 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., & Anderson, S. E. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. New York: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, university of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathison, S., & Ross, E. W. (2004). Introduction: The nature and limits of standards-based reform and assessment. In S. Mathison & E. W. Ross (Eds.), The nature and limits of standards-based reform and assessment (pp. xvii–xxxv). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintrop, H., & Sunderman, G. L. (2009). Predictable failure of federal sanctions-driven accountability for school improvement-and why we may retain it anyway. Educational Researcher., 38(5), 353–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, S. D., Kochan, F. K., Kraska, M., & Reames, E. H. (2011). Professional development and student achievement in high poverty schools: Making the connection. International Studies in Educational Administration, 39(2), 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D., Harris, A., Chapman, C., Stoll, L., & Russ, J. (2009). Improving schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas: A review of research evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(2), 149–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami, E., Garza, E., & Merchant, B. (2010). Successful school leadership in socioeconomically challenging contexts; School principals creating and sustaining successful school improvement. International Studies in Educational Administration, 38(3), 35–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. 065-000-00177-2). Washington, DC: US Government printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Staff Development Council (NSDC). (2004). Standards of practice for professional development. Oxford: National Staff Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, T., & Clarke, S. (2010). Leading learning: Process, themes, and issues in international contexts. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, R. G. (1995). Organizational behavior in education (6th ed.). Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, R., & Witty, E. (2010). The black-white achievement gap: Why closing it is the greatest civil rights issue of our time. New York: American Management Association (AMACOM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellicer, L. O. (2003). Caring enough to lead: How reflective thought leads to moral leadership. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makesprofessional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., Burroughs, N. A., Zoido, P., & Houang, R. T. (2015). The role of schooling in perpetuating educational inequality: An international perspective. Educational Researcher, 44(7), 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seashore Louis, K., Murphy, J., & Smylie, M. (2016). Caring leadership in schools: Findings from exploratory analyses. Educational Administration Quarterly., 52(2), 310–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2012). Schools that learn: A fifth discipline fieldbook for educators, parents, and everyone who cares about education. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T. J. (2007). Rethinking leadership: A collection of articles (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, J., Cooley, V. E., Ma, X., Reeves, P. L., Burt, W. L., Rainey, J. M., & Yuan, W. (2012). Data informed decision-making on high-impact strategies: Developing and validating an instrument for principals. Journal of Experimental Education, 80(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starratt, R. (2004). Ethical leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefkovich, J. A. (2014). Best interests of the student: Applying ethical constructs to legal cases in education (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 6, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Education Trust. (2004). Measured progress: Achievement rises and gaps narrow, but slowly. Washington, DC: The Education Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. (2001). The authentic standards movement and its evil twin. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(5), 358–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G. (2013). Beyond the ivory tower: The role of the intellectual in eliminating poverty. Educational Researcher, 42, 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H. (2011). Knowledge and the leadership of learning. Leadership & Policy in Schools, 10(2), 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act: A progress report on elementary and secondary education. Executive Office of the President. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alford, B., Ballenger, J. (2018). Quandaries of Assessment and Accountability. In: Touchton, D., Rodríguez, M., Ivory, G., Acker-Hocevar, M. (eds) Quandaries of School Leadership. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59120-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59120-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59119-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59120-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics