Skip to main content

Imamichi, Interdependence and Technology-Mediated Action – The Case of Border Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tetsugaku Companion to Japanese Ethics and Technology

Part of the book series: Tetsugaku Companions to Japanese Philosophy ((TCJP,volume 1))

  • 267 Accesses

  • The original version of this chapter was revised: MS Mincho font was updated throughout the book for Japanese and Chinese characters. The correction to this book is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59027-1_13

Abstract

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is employed to reinforce contemporary immigration and borders control, typically motivated by the need to protect national or regional security. Strict immigration criteria in receiving countries leave certain categories of migrants such as unskilled, third-country nationals few options but seeking access in an irregular fashion, for example on the basis of false documents or via unauthorized entry points. In order to avoid detection by border surveillance systems, undocumented migrants typically undertake extensive and dangerous routes, often assisted by human smugglers. Thus, strict migration governance jeopardizes the personal security of migrants who have few options but travelling in an irregular fashion. This chapter investigates the ethics of ICT in the context of border governance from the perspective of Imamichi Tomonobu’s Eco-ethica that requires a critical questioning of the role of technology and technology-mediated action. It is used as a tool to shed light on the problem rather than to solve the problem. Criteria for fair sharing of responsibility for transnational migration are sought in Imamichi’s holistic approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The official report of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission (2012). Executive Summary. The National Diet of Japan NAIIC. https://www.nirs.org/wp-content/uploads/fukushima/naiic_report.pdf

  2. 2.

    http://www.visionzeroinitiative.com/

  3. 3.

    Many of the concerns raised in the long-standing debate on collective responsibility are not developed in Imamichis’ reasoning, for instance the role of intentionality. It is not clear if groups must meet the same stringent conditions of moral responsibility that individuals do – intentionality being a key aspect.

  4. 4.

    http://frontex.europa.eu/assets/About_Frontex/frontex_regulation_en.pdf

  5. 5.

    http://www.coe.int/t/democracy/migration/Source/migration/ProtectingMigrantsECHR_ESCWeb.pdf

  6. 6.

    http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2015010%202006%20INIT

  7. 7.

    http://frontex.europa.eu/assets/Publications/Research/Ethics_of_Border_Security_Report.pdf

  8. 8.

    The Eurodac system comprises the Central Unit, initially operated by the Commission but now managed by the EU Agency for Large-Scale IT Systems, a national unit in each Member State, and the infrastructure for transmitting data between national units and the Central Unit.

  9. 9.

    Cf. Operations Mare Nostrum and Triton. Cf. http://www.marina.difesa.it/EN/operations/Pagine/MareNostrum.aspx and http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-14-566_en.htm

  10. 10.

    http://ejfoundation.org/campaign/climate

  11. 11.

    The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is an international environmental treaty negotiated at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), Rio de Janeiro, June 3–14, 1992. The objective of the treaty is to “stabilize greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.” The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

  12. 12.

    http://ipcc.ch/

  13. 13.

    The CBDR principle is one of the main pillars of sustainable development, drawing on equity considerations and explicated in the 1992 Rio Earth Summit.

References

  • Ajana, Bthaj 2015. “Augmented borders: Big Data and the ethics of immigration control”, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 13.1:58–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brian, Tara and Frank Laczko. 2014. “Fatal Journeys, Tracking Lives Lost during Migration, International Organisation of Migration Report”, International Organization of Migration Report http://publications.iom.int/bookstore/free/FatalJourneys_CountingtheUncounted.pdf.

  • Britz, Johannes. 2013. “To Understand or not to Understand: A Critical Reflection of Information and Knowledge Poverty” Information Ethics in Africa: Cross-cutting Themes. Pretoria: ACEIE: 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broeders, Daniel. 2007.“The New Digital Borders of the European Union” International Sociology 22: 71–92 doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580907070126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broeders, Daniel and Godfried Engbersen. 2007. “The Fight Against Illegal Migration” American Behavioural Scientist 50: 1592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207302470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, O (2007) Climate change and forced migration: Observations, projections and implications, Human Development Report 2007/2008 Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world, Human Development Report Office, OCCASIONAL PAPER Available on November 12th at: https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/climate_forced_migration.pdf

  • Carter, Robert E (2001) Encounter with Enlightenment – A Study of Japanese Ethics, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijestelbloem, Huub. 2009. “Europe’s new technological gatekeepers. Debating the employment of technology in Migration Policy, Amsterdam Law Forum 1.4:11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijstelbloem, Huub and Albert Meijer. 2011. Migration and the New Technological Borders of Europe (Migration, Minorities and Citizenship), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, Carolina. 2010. “Climate Change and Migration: Sorting through Complex Issues without the Hype” Migration Policy Institute Feature Washington, DC: Environmental Justice Foundation, 6:18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gündoğdu, Ayten. 2015. Rightlessness in an Age of Rights: Hannah Arendt and the contemporary struggles of migrants, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gorniak-Kocikowska, Kryztyna. 1996. “The Computer Revolution and the Problem of Global Ethics” in Terrell Ward Bynum and Simon Rogerson, eds., Global Information Ethics, Opragen Publications:177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Carretero, María. 2009. “Reconciling Border Control with the Human Aspects of Unauthorized Migration” International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO) http://www.prio.no/sptrans/724731520/Reconciling-Border-Control.pdf.

  • Huysmans, Jef. 2006. The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Imamichi, Tomonobu. 1984. “The Concept of an Eco-Ethics and the Development of Moral Thoughts” Man and Nature ed. George McLeon, New York: University Press of America (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Imamichi, Tomonobu. 2009. An Introduction to Eco-ethica, Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A.(eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 104 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Deborah. 1999. Computer Ethics in the 21st Century Keynote address at ETHICOMP99, Rome, Italy, October. Published in Spinello, Richard A and Herman H Tavani (eds.) Readings in Cyberethics. Jones and Bartlett, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFerran, Ann (2007). ‘Bangladesh: A Nation in Fear of Drowning,” The Independent, 2007, Available at http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate

  • Mobjörk, Malin and Louise Simonsson. 2011. “Klimatförändringar, migration och konflikter: samband och förutsägelser,” FOI-R%2D%2D3297%2D%2DSE.

  • Palm, Elin. 2014. “Towards Equitable Responsibility-sharing for Forced Migration” International Journal of Migration and Border Studies 1.3:253–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pécoud, Antonine and Paul de Guchteneire. 2006. “International Migration, Border Controls and Human Rights: Assessing the Relevance of a Right to Mobility”, Journal of Borderlands Studies 21.1:69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinyol-Jiménez, Gemma. 2012. “The Migration-Security Nexus in Short: Instruments and actions in the European Union”. Amsterdam Law Forum, VU University Amsterdam http://ojs.ubvu.vu.nl/alf/article/viewFile/255/442.

  • Pogge, Thomas. 2008. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1948. History of Western Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, Judith. 2006. “Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, and Sovereign Power”, American University Law Review, 56.2:367–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ypi, Lea. 2009. “Associative Duties, Global Justice, and the Colonies” Philosophy and Public Affairs 37.2:104–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elin PALM .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

PALM, E. (2019). Imamichi, Interdependence and Technology-Mediated Action – The Case of Border Governance. In: LENNERFORS, T., MURATA, K. (eds) Tetsugaku Companion to Japanese Ethics and Technology. Tetsugaku Companions to Japanese Philosophy, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59027-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics