Skip to main content

Sexual Selection Forces

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sexual Selection in Homo sapiens
  • 714 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, it is argued that sexual selection is not a homogenous force, but it is composed of different constituent selection forces. It is argued further that in the human species, the main forces are parental choice, male-male competition, individual mate choice, and sexual coercion. The interrelation between these different sexual selection forces is explored. This chapter argues also that the presence of different sexual selection forces translates into different reproductive niches being present. Individuals can promote their reproductive success by appealing to parents, by monopolizing access to mates by force, by appealing to opposite sex individuals as mates, and by forcing sex to members of the opposite sex. The size of each niche, and thus the prevalence in the population of the traits that address it, depends on the strength of each selection force, which in turn, is determined by environmental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apostolou, M. (2007). Sexual selection under parental choice: The role of parents in the evolution of human mating. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 403–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apostolou, M. (2008). Parent-offspring conflict over mating: The case of beauty. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apostolou, M. (2014). Sexual selection under parental choice: The evolution of human mating behaviour. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beukeboom, L., & Perrin, N. (2014). The evolution of sex determination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo, G. (1997). The Byzantines. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, A. F. (2009). Sexual selection and the origins of human mating systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T. (1976). Lek organization and mating strategies in the bullfrog. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1, 283–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2009). Evolution and genetics for psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A. (1970). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biological Reviews, 45, 525–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puts, D. A. (2016). Human sexual selection. Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 28–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson, B. (1991). Marriage, divorce and children in ancient Rome. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (1995). The red queen: Sex and the evolution of human nature. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, L.W (2001). Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. (1992). Male aggression against women. Human Nature, 3, 1–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B., & Smuts, R. W. (1993). Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: Evidence and theoretical implications. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 22, 1–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. (1983). Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. American Naturalist, 122, 765–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1974). Parent offspring conflict. American Zoologist, 24, 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man: 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedell, N., Gage, M. J. G., & Parker, G. A. (2002). Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 313–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigby, S., & Chapman, T. (2004). Sperm competition. Current Biology, 14, R100–R103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Apostolou, M. (2017). Sexual Selection Forces. In: Sexual Selection in Homo sapiens. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58999-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics