Skip to main content

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to explore the developmental origins of fairness. To do so, it first describes the relationship between fairness in particular and moral psychology in general. Recent evolutionary accounts of moral psychology have placed a particular emphasis on fairness, due to its importance in governing cooperative interactions between non-kin. Applying this account to development can explain otherwise peculiar features of how fairness emerges over childhood, most notably a “knowledge-behavior gap” in which children understand many features of fairness before they are motivated to behave in compliance with those features. Specifically, merely evaluating others is low-cost and has clear benefits even in infancy (e.g., it influences who we choose to learn from), but costly prosocial behavior is typically beneficial only at later ages, when a reputation for fairness becomes increasingly important for being included rather than shunned for mutually beneficial interactions with others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbot, P., Abe, J., Alcock, J., Alizon, S., Alpedrinha, J. A., Andersson, M., … Zink, A. (2011). Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature, 471(7339), E1–E4; author reply E9–E10. doi:10.1038/nature09831

  • Barclay, P., & Willer, R. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1610), 749–753. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (1994). Nonconsequentialist decisions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17(01), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumard, N., André, J. B., & Sperber, D. (2013). A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 59–78. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11002202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumard, N., Boyer, P., & Sperber, D. (2010). Evolution of fairness: Cultural variability. Science, 329(5990), 388–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumard, N., & Sheskin, M. (2015). Partner choice and the evolution of a contractualist morality. In J. Decety & T. Wheatley (Eds.), The moral brain (pp. 35–48). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benenson, J. F., Pascoe, J., & Radmore, N. (2007). Children’s altruistic behavior in the dictator game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(3), 168–175. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, A., & Tobin, E. (2016). Natural kinds. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2016 ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/natural-kinds/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Ellis, B. J. (2014). Children, childhood, and development in evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 34(3), 225–264. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2014.05.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, P. R., & McAuliffe, K. (2011). “I had so much it didn’t seem fair”: Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity. Cognition, 120(2), 215–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, P. R., McAuliffe, K., Corbit, J., Callaghan, T. C., Barry, O., Bowie, A., … Warneken, F. (2015). The ontogeny of fairness in seven societies. Nature, 528(7581), 258–261. doi:10.1038/nature15703

  • Blake, P. R., McAuliffe, K., & Warneken, F. (2014). The developmental origins of fairness: The knowledge-behavior gap. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(11), 559–561. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.08.00.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. (2016). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. New York, NY: Ecco Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonawitz, E., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Goodman, N. D., Spelke, E., & Schulz, L. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120(3), 322–330. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bones, A. K. (2012). We knew the future all along: Scientific hypothesizing is much more accurate than other forms of precognition—A satire in one part. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 307–309. doi:10.1177/1745691612441216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425(6955), 297–299. doi:10.1038/nature01963.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S. F., Talbot, C., Ahlgren, M., Lambeth, S. P., & Schapiro, S. J. (2010). Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, pan troglodytes. Animal Behaviour, 79(6), 1229–1237. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.02.019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart, J. M., Allon, O., Amici, F., Fichtel, C., Finkenwirth, C., Heschl, A., … van Schaik, C. P. (2014). The evolutionary origin of human hyper-cooperation. Nature Communications, 5, 4747. doi:10.1038/ncomms574

  • Chater, N., Vlaev, I., & Grinberg, M. (2008). A new consequence of simpson’s paradox: Stable cooperation in one-shot prisoner’s dilemma from populations of individualistic learners. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(3), 403–421. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.3.403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernyak, N., Sandham, B., Harris, P. L., & Cordes, S. (2016). Numerical cognition explains age-related changes in third-party fairness. Developmental Psychology, 52(10), 1555–1562.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claidière, N., Whiten, A., Mareno, M. C., Messer, E. J., Brosnan, S. F., Hopper, L. M., … McGuigan, N. (2015). Selective and contagious prosocial resource donation in capuchin monkeys, chimpanzees and humans. Scientific Reports, 5, 7631. doi:10.1038/srep07631

  • Cowell, J. M., Samek, A., List, J., & Decety, J. (2015). The curious relation between theory of mind and sharing in preschool age children. PloS One, 10(2), e0117947. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117947.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 148–153. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dana, J., Cain, D. M., & Dawes, R. M. (2006). What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(2), 193–201. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debove, S., André, J. B., & Baumard, N. (2015). Partner choice creates fairness in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1808), 20150392. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0392.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Delton, A. W., Krasnow, M. M., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2010). Evolution of fairness: Rereading the data. Science, 329(5990), 389–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edele, A., Dziobek, I., & Keller, M. (2013). Explaining altruistic sharing in the dictator game: The role of affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and justice sensitivity. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, J. M., Over, H., Herrmann, E., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Young children care more about their reputation with ingroup members and potential reciprocators. Developmental Science, 16(6), 952–958. doi:10.1111/desc.12086.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454(7208), 1079–1083. doi:10.1038/nature07155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, G. E. (2008). Attending to the outcome of others: Disadvantageous inequity aversion in male capuchin monkeys (cebus apella). American Journal of Primatology, 70(9), 901–905. doi:10.1002/ajp.20576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geraci, A., & Surian, L. (2011). The developmental roots of fairness: Infants’ reactions to equal and unequal distributions of resources. Developmental Science, 14(5), 1012–1020. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01048.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, K., & Schein, C. (2016). No absolutism here: Harm predicts moral judgment 30× better than disgust-commentary on Scott, Inbar, & Rozin (2016). Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 11(3), 325–329. doi:10.1177/1745691616635598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, K., Schein, C., & Ward, A. F. (2014). The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. (2015). The rise of moral cognition. Cognition, 135, 39–42. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., & Gutierrez, M. (2006). How long does it take to become a proficient hunter? Implications for the evolution of extended development and long life span. Journal of Human Evolution, 51(5), 454–470. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133(4), 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, K., Warneken, F., Greenberg, J. R., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not in chimpanzees. Nature, 476(7360), 328–331. doi:10.1038/nature10278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The Genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7(1), 1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin, J. K., Ullman, T., Tenenbaum, J., Goodman, N., & Baker, C. (2013). The mentalistic basis of core social cognition: Experiments in preverbal infants and a computational model. Developmental Science, 16(2), 209–226. doi:10.1111/desc.12017.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557–559. doi:10.1038/nature06288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Ensminger, J., Mcelreath, R., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., … Ziker, J. (2010). Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science, 1480(March 2010), 1480–1484. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182238

  • Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., … Ziker, J. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science (New York, N.Y.), 312(5781), 1767–1770. doi:10.1126/science.1127333

  • Heyes, C. (2016). Who knows? Metacognitive social learning strategies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(3), 204–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horner, V., & Whiten, A. (2005). Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 8(3), 164–181. doi:10.1007/s10071-004-0239-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • House, B. R., Silk, J. B., Henrich, J., Barrett, H. C., Scelza, B. A., Boyette, A. H., … Laurence, S. (2013). Ontogeny of prosocial behavior across diverse societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(36), 14586–14591. doi:10.1073/pnas.1221217110.

  • Hsu, M., Anen, C., & Quartz, S. R. (2008). The right and the good: Distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency. Science (New York, N.Y.), 320(5879), 1092–1095. doi:10.1126/science.1153651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A. M., Holden, P. C., & Santos, L. R. (2016). Exploring the evolutionary origins of overimitation: A comparison across domesticated and non-domesticated canids. Developmental Science, 20(4). doi:10.1111/desc.12460

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A. M., Mills, C. M., & Landrum, A. R. (2015). How do children weigh competence and benevolence when deciding whom to trust? Cognition, 144, 76–90. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. The American Economic Review, 76(4), 728–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M. A., Clément, F., & Harris, P. L. (2004). Trust in testimony: Children’s use of true and false statements. Psychological Science, 15(10), 694–698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmeier, V., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2003). Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychological Science, 14(5), 402–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legare, C. H., & Nielsen, M. (2015). Imitation and innovation: The dual engines of cultural learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(11), 688–699.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, Z., Woodward, A. L., & Kinzler, K. D. (2016). Preverbal infants infer third-party social relationships based on language. Cognitive Science, 41(Suppl 3), 622–634.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • List, J. A. (2007). On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. Journal of Political Economy, 115(3), 482–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LoBue, V., Nishida, T., Chiong, C., DeLoache, J. S., & Haidt, J. (2011). When getting something good is bad: Even three-year-olds react to inequality. Social Development, 20(1), 54–170. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00560.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, D. E., Young, A. G., & Keil, F. C. (2007). The hidden structure of overimitation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(50), 19751–19756. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704452104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MacFarquhar, L. (2015). Strangers drowning: Grappling with impossible idealism, drastic choices, and the overpowering urge to help. New York, NY: Penguin Press HC.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, R., & Whitehouse, H. (2015). Religion and morality. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 447–473. doi:10.1037/a0038455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, C. L., Quinlan, R., & Malcom, C. D. (2013). Cooperative breeding and maternal energy expenditure among aka foragers. American Journal of Human Biology: The Official Journal of the Human Biology Council, 25(1), 42–57. doi:10.1002/ajhb.22336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meristo, M., & Surian, L. (2013). Do infants detect indirect reciprocity? Cognition, 129(1), 102–113. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D., & Bateson, M. (2015). Adaptive developmental plasticity: What is it, how can we recognize it and when can it evolve? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1812), 20151005. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.1005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nishi, A., Christakis, N. A., Evans, A. M., O’Malley, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2016). Social environment shapes the speed of cooperation. Scientific Reports, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noë, R., & Hammerstein, P. (1994). Biological markets: Supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 35(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E., & Wilson, E. O. (2010). The evolution of eusociality. Nature, 466(7310), 1057–1062. doi:10.1038/nature09205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pennisi, E. (2014). Our egalitarian Eden. Science, 344(6186), 824–825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, J., Bering, J. M., & Ingram, G. (2011). “Princess Alice is watching you”: Children’s belief in an invisible person inhibits cheating. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(3), 311–320. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poulin-Dubois, D., & Brosseau-Liard, P. (2016). The developmental origins of selective social learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 60–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427–430. doi:10.1038/nature11467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Range, F., Horn, L., Viranyi, Z., & Huber, L. (2009). The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(1), 340–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. F., & Sommerville, J. A. (2011). Fairness expectations and altruistic sharing in 15-month-old human infants. PloS One, 6(10), e23223. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.00232283.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, A., & Olson, K. R. (2012). Children discard a resource to avoid inequity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(2), 382–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheskin, M., & Santos, L. (2012). The evolution of morality: which aspects of human moral concerns are shared with nonhuman primates? In J. Vonk & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative evolutionary psychology (pp. 434–450). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheskin, M., Ashayeri, K., Skerry, A., & Santos, L. R. (2014). Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) fail to show inequality aversion in a no-cost situation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(2), 80–88. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Wynn, K. (2014). Anti-equality: Social comparison in young children. Cognition, 130(2), 152–156. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.10.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheskin, M., Chevallier, C., Lambert, S., & Baumard, N. (2014). Life-history theory explains childhood moral development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(12), 613–615. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.08.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheskin, M., Nadal, A., Croom, A., Mayer, T., Nissel, J., & Bloom, P. (2016). Some equalities are more equal than others: Quality equality emerges later than numerical equality. Child Development, 87(5), 1520–1528. doi:10.1111/cdev.12544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberberg, A., Crescimbene, L., Addessi, E., Anderson, J. R., & Visalberghi, E. (2009). Does inequity aversion depend on a frustration effect? A test with capuchin monkeys (cebus apella). Animal Cognition, 12(3), 505–509. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0211-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sloane, S., Baillargeon, R., & Premack, D. (2012). Do infants have a sense of fairness? Psychological Science, 23(2), 196–204. doi:10.1177/0956797611422072.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. E., Blake, P. R., & Harris, P. L. (2013). I should but I won’t: Why young children endorse norms of fair sharing but do not follow them. PloS One, 8(3), e59510. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059510.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerville, J. A., Schmidt, M. F. H., Yun, J.-E., & Burns, M. (2013). The development of fairness expectations and prosocial behavior in the second year of life. Infancy, 18(1), 40–66. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00129.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takagishi, H., Kameshima, S., Schug, J., Koizumi, M., & Yamagishi, T. (2010). Theory of mind enhances preference for fairness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 130–137. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.09.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, C. F., Price, S. A., & Brosnan, S. F. (2016). Inequity responses in nonhuman animals. In C. Sabbagh & M. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbook of social justice theory and research (pp. 387–403). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschfrift Fur Tierpsycologie, 20, 410–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2016). A natural history of human morality. London: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., Sell, A., Lieberman, D., & Sznycer, D. (2008). 15 internal regulatory variables and the design of human motivation: A computational and evolutionary approach, Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (Vol. 251). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uğurel-Semin, R. (1952). Moral behavior and moral judgment of children. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 463–474. doi:10.1037/h0056970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., Hare, B., Melis, A. P., Hanus, D., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Spontaneous altruism by chimpanzees and young children. PLoS Biology, 5(7), 1414–1420. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warneken, F., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Altruistic helping in human infants and young chimpanzees. Science (New York, N.Y.), 311(5765), 1301–1303. doi:10.1126/science.1121448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wascher, C. A., & Bugnyar, T. (2013). Behavioral responses to inequity in reward distribution and working effort in crows and ravens. PloS One, 8(2), e56885. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056885.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Waytz, A., Zaki, J., & Mitchell, J. P. (2012). Response of dorsomedial prefrontal cortex predicts altruistic behavior. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 32(22), 7646–7650. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6193-11.2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, S. A., Griffin, A. S., & Gardner, A. (2008). Social semantics: How useful has group selection been? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21(1), 374–385. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01458.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winking, J., & Mizer, N. (2013). Natural-field dictator game shows no altruistic giving. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(4), 288–293. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, N. D., Hodgson, K., Fleming, S. M., Symmonds, M., Guitart-Masip, M., & Dolan, R. J. (2012). Human responses to unfairness with primary rewards and their biological limits. Scientific Reports, 2, 593. doi:10.1038/srep00593.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Sheskin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sheskin, M. (2017). The Evolution of Moral Development. In: Li, M., Tracer, D. (eds) Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Fairness, Equity, and Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58993-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics