Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Problems of Enterprise Architecture Adoption in the Public Sector: Root Causes and Some Solutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Technology Governance in Public Organizations

Part of the book series: Integrated Series in Information Systems ((ISIS,volume 38))

Abstract

Enterprise architecture (EA) is a comprehensive approach aimed at understanding and aligning an organization’s business strategy and processes, information resources, and information technologies. However, implementing this approach in an organization is not an easy task as organizations have their preexisting siloes and fragmented procedures and departments. Comprehensive, inter-organizational practices, such as EA, usually break old procedures and habits, shift decision-making power, and challenge old values. This makes EA endeavors extremely difficult. In this paper, we conduct a qualitative multiple-case study. We use institutional theory to identify problems and their root causes in EA adoption in three cases. We also discuss possible solutions—by identifying eight root causes and several examples, both successful and not-so-successful—to mitigate or overcome these problems. We also argue that institutional theory and its three pillars provide a usable lens to analyze EA adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aier, S., & Weiss, S. (2012). An institutional framework for analyzing organizational responses to the establishment of architectural transformation. In The 20th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2012), Barcelona: Paper 228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, J. S., Marc, B., & Enrico, C. (2004). Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: The nature of patient care information system-related errors. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11, 104–112. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1471.

  • Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2008). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. In R. Greenwood et al. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 78–98). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, C.-H., & van Loggerenberg, J. (2013). Challenges facing enterprise architects: A South African Perspective. In The 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Kauai, HI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dang, D. D., & Pekkola, J. S. (2017). Systematic literature review on enterprise architecture in the public sector. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 15(2), 130–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dang, D. D., & Pekkola, S. (2016a). Institutionalising enterprise architecture in the public sector in vietnam. In The 2016 European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2016. İstanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dang, D. D., & Pekkola, S. (2016b). Root causes of enterprise architecture problems in the public sector. In PACIS 2016 Proceedings. Paper 287.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewett, T., & Jones, G. R. (2001). The role of information technology in the organization: A review, model, and assessment. Journal of Management, 27(3), 313–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauder, M., Roth, S., Matthes, F., & Schulz, C. (2013). An examination of organizational factors influencing enterprise architecture management challenges. In The 21st European Conference on Information Systems. Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjort-Madsen, K. (2006). Enterprise architecture implementation and management: A case study on interoperability. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-39). Kauai: Computer Societry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjort-Madsen, K. (2007). Institutional patterns of enterprise architecture adoption in government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1(4), 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjort-Madsen, K., & Gøtze, J. (2004). Enterprise architecture in government—towards a multi-level framework for managing it in government. In The Proceedings of ECEG04. Dublin, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjort-Madsen, K., & Pries-Heje, J. (2009). Enterprise architecture in government: Fad or future? In The 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42). Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isomaki, H., & Liimatainen, K. (2008). Challenges of government enterprise architecture work—stakeholders’ views. In Electronic Government: Proceedings of the 7th [IFIP WG 8.5] International Conference, EGOV 2008 (pp. 364-374). Turin, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyamu, T. (2009). The factors affecting institutionalisation of enterprise architecture in the organisation. In The IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC’09) (pp. 221–225).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M., & Hjort-Madsen, K. (2007). Analyzing enterprise architecture in national governments: The cases of Denmark and the Netherlands. In The 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (p. 218a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M., & Klievink, B. (2012). Can enterprise architectures reduce failure in development projects? Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(1), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaisler, S. H., Armour, F., & Valivullah, M. (2005). Enterprise architecting: Critical problems. In The 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-G., & Everest, G. C. (1994). Building an is architecture: Collective wisdom from the field. Information & Management, 26(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y.-J., Kwon, Y.-I., Shin, S., & Kim, E.-J. (2013). Advancing government-wide Enterprise Architecture—A meta-model approach. In The Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Löhe, J., & Legner, C. (2014). Overcoming implementation challenges in enterprise architecture management: a design theory for architecture-driven IT management (ADRIMA). Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(1), 101–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucke, C., Krell, S., & Lechner, U. (2010). Critical issues in enterprise architecting—a literature review. In The 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems (p. 305). Lima, Peru

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, J., & Nilsson, A. (2006). Infusing an architectural framework with neo-institutional theory: reports from recent change management initiatives within the Swedish public administration. In The 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magoulas, T., Hadzic, A., Saarikko, T., & Pessi, K. (2012). Alignment in enterprise architecture: A comparative analysis of four architectural approaches. Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 15(1), 88–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIC. (2014). Information and data on information and communication technology Vietnam 2014. In National Commission on Application of Information Technology. Hanoi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignerat, M., & Rivard, S. (2009). Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 24(4), 369–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. D. (2009). Qualitative research in business and management. London, UK: SAGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, H.-C. (2006). Credit agreement C4116-VN conformed. Retrieved August 8, 2015, from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2006/06/6920738/credit-agreement-c4116-vn-conformed.

  • Niemi, E., & Pekkola, S. (2017). Using enterprise architecture artefacts in an organisation. Enterprise Information Systems, 11(3), 313–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Barley, S. (2001). Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 145–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, K. H. C., & Júnior, R. T. D. S. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of enterprise architecture in the public administration. International Journal on Information, 18(2), 501–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. W. (2009). Information technology strategy-creating a strategic it architecture competency: Learning in stages. In R. D. Galliers & D. E. Leidner (Eds.), Strategic information management: Challenges and strategies in managing information systems (p. 584). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha, P. (2009). Architecting the connected government: Practices and innovations in Singapore. In The 3rd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations foundations for organizational science. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2005). Institutional theory. In encyclopedia of social theory (pp. 408–414). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppänen, V., Heikkilä, J., & Liimatainen, K. (2009). Key issues in EA-implementation: Case study of two Finnish government agencies. In The 11th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (pp. 114–120).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, D., Fischbach, K., & Schoder, D. (2014). Enterprise architecture management and its role in corporate strategic management. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 12(5), 5–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research 3rd edition (pp. 443–466). London: Saga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Saga.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. CIO. (1999). Federal enterprise architecture framework (Version 1.1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (2009). Interpreting information systems in organizations: Creative commons Attribution 3.0 License.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., & Hjort-Madsen, K. (2007). Integration and enterprise architecture challenges in e-government: A European perspective. International Journal of Cases on Electronic Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiß, K. S. (2015). Institutionalizing architectural coordination in organizations. Switzerland: University of St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, S., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2013). Institutionalization and the effectiveness of enterprise architecture management. In The Thirty Fourth International Conference on Information Systems. Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, K., Sabine, B., Matthes, F., & Schweda, C. M. (2010). Investigating the state-of-the-art in enterprise architecture management methods in literature and practice. In The Proceedings of the MCIS. Paper 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • WorldBank. (2005). Project information document. Retrieved August 8, 2015, from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/04/5796181/vietnam-ict-development-project.

  • Zachman , J. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, (26)3, 276–292.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partly funded by the Academy of Finland, grant #306000.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Industrial and Information Management, Tampere University of Technology, PO Box 541, 33101, Tampere, Finland

    Dinh Duong Dang & Samuli Pekkola

Authors
  1. Dinh Duong Dang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samuli Pekkola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dinh Duong Dang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Kista, Stockholm, Sweden

    Lazar Rusu

  2. EPFL CDM MTEI CSI, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Gianluigi Viscusi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dang, D.D., Pekkola, S. (2017). Problems of Enterprise Architecture Adoption in the Public Sector: Root Causes and Some Solutions. In: Rusu, L., Viscusi, G. (eds) Information Technology Governance in Public Organizations. Integrated Series in Information Systems, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58978-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation